HOME

Transplant Articles

 

(Back to main transplant page)

    Back to Index of Research Articles

  A National Survey of Split-Liver Transplantation in the United States
  Clinical Trials: Hepatic Encephalopathy
  How Does Combo Therapy Stack Up Against Recurrent Hepatitis?
  Liver transplantation in patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal bleeding.

 

 
A National Survey of Split-Liver Transplantation in the United States
Source: www.gastrohep.com

Biliary and vascular complications account for the majority of morbidity in split-liver transplantations, find researchers in the February issue of Annals of Surgery.

Split-liver transplantation is a theoretically attractive mechanism to increase cadaver organ supply. In this study, a team of researchers assessed the application and outcomes of split-liver transplantation in the United States.

They surveyed 89 surgical teams between 2000 and 2001. The researchers collected data on graft type, recipient status, procurement method, graft sharing, graft outcomes, recipient outcomes, and experience with whole-organ transplantation.

Of the 89 surgical teams, 83 provided the researchers with data on 207 left lateral segment, 152 right trisegment, 15 left lobe, and 13 right lobe grafts.

The research team established that the split procedure was performed ex vivo in 54% and in situ in 46% of grafts.

They determined that complications occurred frequently in all graft types. Biliary and vascular complications were evenly distributed between grafts procured by either technique.

The researchers found that primary nonfunction, graft failure, and recipient death correlated with transplant status.

Dr John Renz's team concluded, "Split-liver transplantation has been principally applied to adult-child pairs with at least one recipient critically ill".

"Biliary and vascular complications account for the majority of morbidity in grafts procured by either split technique with graft failure and recipient death observed more frequently in critically ill recipients".

"Enhanced utilization and improved results may be possible through improved information sharing and modification of allocation criteria".

Ann Surg 2004; 239(2): 172-81

 

 

Clinical Trials: Hepatic Encephalopathy

California

San Diego; SC Liver Research Consortium
An Oral 2 Week Safety and Tolerability Study of a Caspase Inhibitor in Patients with Hepatic Impairment

Trial Information
 

Summary: An Oral 2 Week Safety and Tolerability Study of a Caspase Inhibitor in Patients with Hepatic Impairment

The purpose of this clinical research study is to determine the safety and tolerability of an oral investigational drug for the treatment of liver impaired patients. The study drug is a caspase inhibitor that may block liver cell death. Eligible participants will be randomly selected to receive either the study drug or a placebo (an inactive substance). There will be up to 13 clinic visits during this study. At least 2 screening visits (one week apart) are required to see if participants qualify for the study. Clinic visits include one or more of the following: physical examinations, blood and urine collection, and ECGs. Participants must be willing to undergo a liver biopsy if indicated. Study medications will be self -administered orally once a day or up to three times a day for 2 weeks. There will be two days, at the beginning and end of the study drug treatment, where an 8-hour clinic stay is required. There will be 6 clinic visits during this 2 -week period. Follow-up clinic visits are required once a week for the following two weeks then every 2 weeks for 2 visits.

 

Contact:

Linda Wilkes, Project Manager
SC Liver Research Consortium
9333 Genesee Ave., Ste 100
San Diego, CA 92121
Telephone: 1-877-415-9504
Fax: 858-882-8335
Email: lwilkes@scrippsclinic.com

 

Profile Page: SC Liver Research Consortium, San Diego, CA

 

 

 

 

 
How Does Combo Therapy Stack Up Against Recurrent Hepatitis?

Combination therapy using pegylated interferon and the anti-viral medication, ribavirin, is an effective way to treat recurrent hepatitis C in patients following liver transplantation, says one group of doctors in Nebraska. But side effects, should be taken into account since they're one limiting factor.

Testing A Therapy
Doctors at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha launched a study to try to find out whether combination therapy with pegylated interferon would be more effective than standard interferon.1

The research is published in Transplantation Proceedings, an Elsevier journal.

"Recurrent hepatitis C is often treated with an interferon and ribavirin combination therapy, but the results have been disappointing," wrote the study team headed by Sandeep Mukherjee, M.D., in the Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. "Given the promising results reported with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for HCV, we were interested in determining the effectiveness of this treatment for a cohort of liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV."

This study was an extension of previous work investigating the effectiveness of standard interferon monotherapy, and in combination with ribavirin, for patients with recurrent HCV after liver transplant procedures, Mukherjee told Priority Healthcare.

"It's quite clear that the pegylated ones are better than the old-fashioned interferons [for recurrent HCV]," he said. "We still don't know whether PEG-Intron is better than Pegasys. I think that's probably going to be answered by pre-transplant studies."

Evaluating The Impact of Therapy
During a one-year period between 2001 and 2002, Mukherjee and his colleagues evaluated a group of patients who presented with recurrent hepatitis following liver transplantation. Each patient was screened to determine if they were eligible for therapy.

Each patient during the study was prescribed weekly doses of PEG-Intron (1.5 mg/kg of body weight)—a pegylated interferon manufactured by Schering-Plough pharmaceuticals—combined with daily doses of 800 milligrams of ribavirin and 1 milligram of folic acid as a treatment to prevent anemia, a possible side effect of ribavirin.2

The physicians performed liver function tests, conducted genetic tests of the virus to determine its presence in the liver, and performed liver biopsies. Tests to detect presence of the virus were repeated three months into treatment, at the end of therapy, and then again 6 months following the end of therapy for patients who had no evidence of the virus at the end of treatment.

The average age of the patients who took part was about 50 years.

"Eighteen patients completed treatment, four remain on treatment, and 17 were intolerant," the research team wrote after the study was finished.

A Side Effect Issue
While approximately 43 percent of the patients were forced to quit the study before their treatment schedule was completed due to intolerable side effects, more than two-thirds who had completed therapy had no evidence of the hepatitis C virus in their bloodstream (eradication of HCV RNA), and this was also the case at the 6-month post-treatment follow-up, Mukherjee and his colleagues found.

"Side effects are an important limiting factor in the treatment of recurrent HCV with pegylated interferon and ribavirin," the team wrote. "However, these results are encouraging as sustained HCV eradication occurred in at least 66.7 percent of patients who completed treatment."

The physicians call for larger clinical trials involving many more patients taking the same combination therapy to confirm their findings, as well as to measure how this treatment affects the quality of life for patients with recurrent HCV.

Questions To Clarify
While the clinical course of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is still not completely understood, experts believe HCV can re-infect patients rather quickly if their immune systems are compromised.

Studies have suggested that at least 50 percent of liver transplant recipients can re-develop full-blown hepatitis and about 10 percent develop cirrhosis at five years after surgery.3

The use of living-donor liver transplantation has resulted in an increased risk of cholestatic hepatitis4, or in outcomes similar to those using cadavers for liver transplantation.5

"The problem is that most patients who get transplants for hepatitis C do okay, but there's a small group who don't," Mukherjee explained. "And the dilemma we have is that we cannot always predict which patients will do well, and which patients will do badly post transplant."

Treatment options for such patients have been met with varied success, as well.

Other studies have found that retransplantation after HCV re-infection is not very useful and results in poor outcomes.6 "When someone gets very bad recurrent hepatitis C, say, within one year post transplant, re-transplanting them is not an option because it doesn't work," Mukherjee. "If they lose their liver, say, 5, 6, 7 years post transplant, that's different because when you re-transplant those patients, their outcomes are as good as other re-transplant patients."

1. Mukherjee S et al. Pilot study of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2003 Dec;35(8):3042-44.
2. Sulkowski MS. Anemia in the treatment of hepatitis C infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37 Suppl 4:S315-22.
3. Gane EJ et al. Long-term outcome of hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 1996 Mar 28;334(13):815-20.
4. Gaglio PJ et al. Increased risk of cholestatic hepatitis C in recipients of grafts from living versus cadaveric liver donors. Liver Transpl 2003;9:1028-35.
5. Everson Gt, Troter J. Role of adult living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C. Liver Transpl 2003;9(suppl 10):S64-S68.
6. Berenguer M et al. Severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver retransplantation for hepatitis C virus-related graft cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 2003;9:228-35.


John Martin is a long-time health journalist and an editor for Priority Healthcare. His credits include coverage of health news for the website of Fox Television's The Health Network, and articles for the New York Post and other consumer and trade publications

www.hepatitisneighborhood.com

 

 
Liver transplantation in patients with liver cirrhosis and esophageal bleeding.

Hillert C, Fischer L, Broering DC, Rogiers X.

Transplantation Center, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Hamburg, Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. hillert@uke.uni-hamburg.de

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hemorrhage from esophageal varices is one of the most devastating complications of portal hypertension in patients with advanced cirrhosis. METHODS: Drug therapy, endoscopic therapy, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), or surgical shunts are used with increasing success in the prevention and treatment of bleeding. However, all these treatment modalities have limitations because they do not treat the liver cirrhosis itself. On the other hand, treatment modalities for variceal bleeding may influence the ease of the feasibility of the transplantation procedure. This is particularly the case for surgical treatments like portosystemic shunts and devascularization operations. For this reason these procedures should be avoided if possible. When positioned correctly, a TIPS provides an elegant way of treating portal hypertension without influencing the course of liver transplantation. Liver transplantation offers a treatment that cures both the portal hypertension and the liver disease. However, the use of this method of treatment is limited by the organ availability and by the organ allocation algorithm, resulting in considerable waiting time. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, esophageal bleeding should be noticed as an early warning factor, leading the hepatologist to consider liver transplantation and early listing of the patient.

Publication Types:
  • Review
  • Review, Tutorial


PMID: 12756568 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 

   
   
   
   
   
 
HOME Liver Cancer
FAQ Great Place To Start Autoimmune Hepatitis
Have You Just Been Diagnosed ? Other Medical Conditions & HCV
Glossary HCV Worldwide News & Research
History Of HCV HCV News Archives 2001-2002
Your Liver Functions Internet Conference Reports on All New and Current HCV Therapies
Symptoms Of HCV Nutrition & HCV
Transmission Of HCV Interviews: Members & Professionals
Sex And HCV HCV Support Groups Listed By State
Understanding Your Blood Tests  Labs Transplant Support Groups Listed By State
Monitoring Blood Work On Treatment Insurance, Financial Aid & Free Meds
Liver Biopsy Understanding Your Results How to Find a Doctor & What to Ask
Viral Loads Members Share Their First Shot Experience
Genotypes Shared Stories From Our  Members
Infergen Your Questions & HCV
 Inhibitors &  New Therapies Chat Room & Message Boards
Peg Intron & Pegasys Books On HCV
Help With Side Effects During Treatment Food For The Soul Inspirational Stories
Drug Interactions & Treatment Informative Links
Latest HCV Trials Pictures Of Our Members
Liver Fibrosis What's New at Janis and Friends
Cirrhosis Sign Our Guestbook
Transplants Contact Us mailto:JansDream@angelhaven.com
Current Transplant Research In Memory Of Janis