HOME

Transplant Articles

Back to Index

    NIH Launches Study of Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Potential Therapy Reported for Children, Adults with End-Stage Liver Disease
    Acute liver failure and timing of transplantation
    New Model Identifies Patients With Best Chance of Surviving Liver Transplant
    Potential Therapy Reported for Children, Adults with End-Stage Liver Disease

 

  October 9, 2002

BETHESDA, MD-The NIH today announced the

Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver
Transplant Cohort Study (A2ALL), to take place at 10 U.S. centers over the
next 7 years. The national project will investigate the experience of a
group of patients eligible for living donor liver transplantation, focusing
on the factors influencing outcomes of living donor liver transplants for
both donors and recipients. Researchers will compare outcomes of this new
procedure with the outcomes for patients who receive livers from cadavers.

"Our goal is to gather accurate data in a disciplined, careful way so we can
give liver transplant patients and potential donors solid information about
the risks and benefits of this innovative and controversial procedure," says
Jean Emond, M.D., chief of transplantation services at Columbia University
and a co-chair of the study. Carl L. Berg, M.D., director of hepatology at
the University of Virginia, is also a co-chair. In addition to vital
clinical issues, the A2ALL will investigate important research issues such
as liver regeneration, liver cancer, and infectious hepatitis.

Liver transplantation is the only cure and a life-saving measure for people
with end-stage liver disease. Although liver transplants have become
relatively common in the United States in recent decades, in 2001 some
17,000 patients waited for livers to be donated, while fewer than 5,000
cadaveric livers were actually donated that year. The shortage of cadaveric
organs has led surgeons to look to live donors to close that gap. The liver
is a large segmented organ that can potentially be split without harm to the
donor and with benefit to the recipient. Because the liver, unlike most
organs, has a remarkable ability to regenerate, the donor's remaining liver
grows to its original size within weeks. Likewise, the donated lobe will
also grow in the recipient's body.

For children in need of liver transplantation, living donor transplantation
from an adult has been very successful and has become an accepted medical
option. Adults in need of liver transplantation require a larger segment, as
much as half or more of the donor's liver. This requires a more extensive
and complex surgery, with potentially greater risks for the donor and the
recipient. The procedure has evolved so rapidly that over half of the living
donor transplants performed to date have occurred since 2000. Evaluation of
donors as well as surgical procedures vary from one transplant center to
another. Although the large majority of living donor liver transplants have
been successful, there are few data to inform potential donors about risks.
Post-surgical problems for donors can include infection, pneumonia, and
leaking bile, which can require further surgery.
Because the procedure is expanding across the country, a group of concerned
doctors called for more research on risks and benefits and an outside
regulator to certify hospitals that would perform the procedure in the New
England Journal of Medicine (April 4, 2002). They also asked for uniform
medical criteria in picking donors and recipients. "There is no regulation
of surgical interventions. The A2ALL study can break new ground in shaping
the way we approach transplant surgery," adds Robert Merion, M.D., study
chair and leader of the data coordinating center at the University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor.

"The NIH, with assistance from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
(ASTS) and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), expects
A2ALL to provide much-needed data about what works best in this emerging
surgical field," explains James Everhart, M.D., M.P.H., of the National
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, which is funding
the study along with the ASTS and HRSA. "Transplant surgeons place a great
deal of importance on the well-being of both donors and recipients. This
partnership with NIDDK should give us solid data for the high quality
patient care we all want to provide," adds James Schulak, M.D., ASTS
president. HRSA, like the NIH, is a component of the Department of Health
and Human Services.

Editors: A list of Centers, Principal Investigators, and Media contacts is
listed below.
# # #
Contact:
Jane DeMouy
301-435-8115

Leslie Curtis
301-496-3583
CALIFORNIA, Los Angeles

University of California, LA
Ron Busuttil, M.D.
rbusutti@mednet.ucla.edu
310-825-5318

Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center
R. Mark Ghobrial, M.D.
rgobrial@mednet.ucla.edu
310-825-2678ILLINOIS, Chicago

Northwestern University
Mike Abecassis, M.D.
mabecass@nmh.org
312-695-0359
Andreas Blei, M.D.
a-blei@northwestern.edu
312-503-3453

Media Contact:
Patty Cochran, 312-926-5900
pcochra@nmh.orgPENNSYLVANIA, Philadephia

University of Pennsylvania Abraham Shaked, M.D.
abraham.shaked@uphs.upenn.edu
215-662-6723
Raj Reddy, M.D.
rajender.reddy@uphs.upenn.edu
215-349-8352

Media Contact:
Rosann Thompson, (215) 662-2560
rosann.thompson@uphs.upenn.edu
CALIFORNIA, San Francisco

University of California, SF Chris E. Freise, M.D.
friesec@surgery.ucsf.edu
415-353-1888
Norah Terrault, M.D.
noraht@itsa.ucsf.edu
415-476-2227

Media Contact:
Janet Basu, 415-476-2557
jbasu@pubaff.ucsf.eduNEW YORK, New York

Columbia University
Jean Emond, M.D. (co-chair)
je111@columbia.edu
212-305-9691
Bob Brown, M.D.
rb464@columbia.edu
212-305-0662

Media Contact:
Maile Chaffin-Quiray
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
mac9047@nyp.org
(212) 305-5587VIRGINIA, Charlottesville

University of Virginia
Carl L. Berg, M.D. (co-chair)
CLB7D@virginia.edu
434-924-2626
Timothy Pruett, M.D.
UVA Health System
tp2w@virginia.edu
434-924-9462

Media Contact:
Jennifer Chafin, 434-243-6286
JLC9D@virginia.edu
COLORADO, Denver

University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center James Trotter, M.D.
james.trotter@uchsc.edu
303-372-8866
Igal Kam, M.D.
igal.kam@uchsc.edu
303-372-8750

Media Contact:
Kendra Smith
kendra.smith@uchsc.edu
303-315-5571NORTH CAROLINA, Chapel Hill

University of North Carolina Roshan Shrestha, M.D.
R_Shrestha@med.unc.edu
Jeff Fair, M.D.
jeff_fair@med.unc.edu
919-966-8008

Media Contact:
Leslie H. Lang,
919-843-9687
llang@med.unc.eduVIRGINIA, Richmond

Virginia Commonwealth University Robert A. Fisher, M.D., F.A.C.S.
rafisher@hsc.vcu.edu
804-828-2461
Mitchell Shiffman, M.D., F.A.C.S.
mshiffma@hsc.vcu.edu
804-828-4060

Media Contact:
Joe Kuttenkuler, 804-828-6607
jpkutten@vcu.ed
DATA COORDINATING CENTER

University of Michigan
Robert M. Merion, M.D.
734-998-6611
merionb@umich.edu

Media Contact:
Krista Hopson, 734-764-2220
khopson@umich.edu
 

 
 
 
Potential Therapy Reported for Children, Adults with End-Stage Liver Disease

By Carrie Wingate, Ph.D.

Researchers from Johns Hopkins in Baltimore recently reported findings that administration of a single chemical, methionine sulfoximine (MSO), to rats protected them from the effects of hyperammonemia, or excessive levels of ammonia in the blood. These findings are significant for human patients with liver disease, because in its final stages the condition leads to swelling of a type of brain cells called astrocytes, often leading to coma and death.

As the liver begins to fail, it can no longer process ammonia, which is a normally produced by the body as a by-product of other processes. The resulting hyperammonemia causes the formation of glutamine. Experimental evidence suggests that astrocytes begin to swell when glutamine accumulates in them and then attracts water as well. This swelling (encephalopathy) puts pressure on the brain and interrupts its normal functions.

MSO is known to prevent the formation of glutamine. In the animal study, the researchers pretreated rats with MSO and then induced hyperammonemia. When compared to rats that had not been treated first with MSO, the treated rats showed no swelling in their astrocytes or in their brains in general, and none of the animals showed any signs of brain damage.

The researchers hope to begin clinical trials of MSO in humans within a year.

Copyright (c) 2002 Acurian Inc. All Rights Reserved.

This article is a summation of material that is no longer accessible on the Acurian site. All facts, details and references remain consistent with the original material.
 
   
   
Acute liver failure and timing of transplantation
Liver transplantation greatly improves the prognosis of patients with fulminant liver failure. In the United Kingdom paracetamol overdose is now the commonest cause of acute liver failure, followed by seronegative (non-A, non-B, non-C) hepatitis.

 
Donor liver from adult cut down for insertion into child recipient
 

    Liver transplantation
Top
Liver transplantation
Pancreatic transplantation

Indications and contraindications
Hepatocellular carcinoma complicates many chronic liver diseases, and a small tumour is not a contraindication to transplantaton because tumour recurrence is uncommon in these patients. However, most patients with large (>5 cm) or multiple hepatomas or most other types of cancer are not considered for transplantation as tumours recur rapidly. Patients with certain rare tumours, such as liver metastases from neuroendocrine disease and sarcomas, can do well for several years. Contraindications to liver transplantation include extrahepatic malignancy, severe cardiopulmonary disease, systemic sepsis, and an inability to comply with regular drug treatment.

Common indications for liver transplantation

 

  • Primary biliary cirrhosis
  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis
  • Cryptogenic cirrhosis
  • Chronic active hepatitis (usually secondary to hepatitis B and C)
  • Alcoholic liver disease (after a period of abstinence)
     

 

 

Timing and selection of patients for transplantation
The preoperative status of the patient is one of the most important factors predicting the outcome after transplantation. Patients with chronic liver disease and signs of decompensation should be assessed for transplantation before they become critically ill. In certain diseases, such as primary biliary cirrhosis, quality of life issues may form the basis for indication for transplantation. For example, chronic lack of energy can be debilitating in patients with biliary cirrhosis.


 

Signs of decompensation in chronic liver disease

 

  • Tiredness
  • Ascites
  • Encephalopathy
  • Peripheral oedema
  • Jaundice (not always a feature)
  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis---abdominal pain (a late sign)
  • Bleeding oesophageal or gastric varices
  • Low albumin concentration
  • Raised prothrombin time
     

 

 

Acute liver failure and timing of transplantation
Liver transplantation greatly improves the prognosis of patients with fulminant liver failure. In the United Kingdom paracetamol overdose is now the commonest cause of acute liver failure, followed by seronegative (non-A, non-B, non-C) hepatitis.


 

Paracetamol overdose

 

  • Causes death by acute liver failure
  • Renal failure develops as a hepatorenal syndrome and by acute tubular necrosis but is usually recoverable
  • Early deaths usually result from raised intracranial pressure, and comatose patients require monitoring in an intensive care unit
  • Death in later stages can occur from multiorgan failure and systemic sepsis
  • If the patient survives without transplantation, the liver will recover without the development of cirrhosis
     

 


 

The donor organ is usually procured as part of a multiorgan retrieval from a heart beating, brain dead patient

 

The mortality from fulminant liver failure can be as high as 90%, whereas one year survival after urgent transplantation is often above 70%. In the United Kingdom, criteria developed at King's College Hospital are used for listing patients for "super urgent" transplantation. This scheme relies on cooperation between the liver transplantation centres to allow transplantation within 48 hours of listing whenever possible.

 

Surgical procedure
Before organs are removed an exploratory laparotomy is done on the donor to rule out any disease process (such as unexpected carcinoma) that may preclude organ donation. The major vessels are then dissected and blood flow controlled in preparation for hypothermic perfusion with a cold preservation solution. University of Wisconsin preservation solution is used most widely. It can preserve the liver adequately for about 13 hours, with acceptable results up to 24 hours.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Implantation of liver transplant after hepatectomy
 

 

Hepatectomy in the organ recipient is the most difficult part of the operation as the patient is at risk of developing a serious haemorrhage due to a combination of portal hypertension, defective clotting, and fibrinolysis. Improvements in surgical technique and anaesthesia have resulted in large reductions in blood loss, and the average requirement for transfusion is now four units of blood. At reimplantation, the suprahepatic and infrahepatic inferior vena cava and the portal vein are anastomosed and the organ is reperfused with blood. This is followed by reconstruction of the hepatic artery and bile duct.

 

Postoperative management
Patients are usually managed in an intensive care unit for the first 12-24 hours after surgery. Enteral feeding is restarted as early as possible, and liver function tests are done daily. Immunosuppressive protocols usually include a combination of cyclosporin or tacrolimus together with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. The dose of steroids is rapidly tapered off, and they can often be stopped after two to three months. The doses of cyclosporin or tacrolimus are reduced gradually during the first year (during which pregnancy should be avoided) and continued at much lower levels for life.


 

Side effects of immunosuppresive drugs


 

 
Drug Side effect Monitoring
Cyclosporin Neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hypertension, hirsutism, gum hyperplasia, diabetes Drug concentrations
Tacrolimus Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hair loss, hypertension, diabetes Drug concentrations
Azathioprine Leucopenia, hair loss White blood cell count
Mycophenolate mofetil Gastrointestinal upset, leucopenia White blood cell count andgastrointestinal symptoms
Steroids Osteoporosis, diabetes, cushingoid face, hypertension Symptoms
General Infections, malignancy Liver and renal function tests, regular follow up, and high index of suspicion

 

 

Acute rejection occurs in about half of patients, but this is easily treated in most cases with extra steroids or by altering the drug regimen. Despite routine use of prophylactic treatment against bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens, infections remain a major cause of morbidity. The side effects of the drugs are usually well controlled before the patient leaves hospital about two weeks after surgery.

 

At discharge, patients need to be familiarised with the drug regimen and side effects and educated about the warning signs of rejection and infection. Patients are usually followed up weekly for the first three months and then at gradually increasing intervals thereafter.

 

Results
The five year survival is 60-90%, depending on the primary disease and the clinical state of the patient before transplantation. The newer antiviral drugs plus the preoperative and postoperative adjuvant therapies for malignancies should lead to further improvements in survival. Although alcoholic liver disease remains a controversial indication for transplantation, carefully selected patients do well.

After successful transplantation patients have a greatly improved lifestyle and are often able to return to work and normal social activities. However, some patients experience medical and social problems. Drug compliance is one of the biggest problems after all types of organ transplantation. Poor compliance leads to chronic rejection and loss of the graft.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
One year survival after first liver transplant according to primary disease, United Kingdom 1985-94
 

 

An extensive network of support services is available to help liver transplant patients. These include the transplant team, referring physician, general practitioner, social services, and local liver patient support groups. Shared care protocols operate in most regions, with most patients cared for primarily by their general practitioner and a gastroenterologist at their local hospital. The mainstay of follow up is regular liver function tests to detect any dysfunction of the transplant. Regular discussion of concerns with the transplant team is essential, and many problems can be sorted out by telephone.

 

Paediatric liver transplantation
In children, the most common indication for liver transplantation is biliary atresia, often after failure to respond to a portoenterostomy. Most children who need a liver transplant are young (under 3 years) and small (<20 kg). Size matched donors are in short supply, and reduced size ("cut down") and split (where one liver is split between two recipients) liver techniques have been used to overcome this problem. Donation of the left lobe of the liver by a living relative is also possible.


 

The shortage of child liver donors has been partly resolved by using smaller sections of adult livers, usually the left lobe

 

 
New Model Identifies Patients With Best Chance of Surviving Liver Transplant
 

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Oct 04 - Researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles have developed a mathematical model for predicting postoperative survival of liver transplant patients.

The recently adopted criteria for organ allocation, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), are biased toward urgency of need, not the efficiency of organ use, Dr. Ronald W. Busuttil and colleagues point out in Annals of Surgery for September. "The current era of severe organ shortage and mounting deaths on the waiting list argue for optimizing outcome by transplantation of nonurgent low-risk patients," they maintain.

The researchers previously developed a survival model based on findings from 510 adults transplanted at their center between 1990 and 2000 for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. They considered 19 donor, recipient, and operative factors.

The four factors that proved to be significant in that study--recipient age, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status, log creatinine, and donor gender--were used as the basis of the current research on a much larger sample. Dr. Busuttil's group analyzed data on a UNOS sample of 25,772 adults who were transplanted between 1990 and 2000 for any ESLD diagnosis.

Because of differences between the patient populations, the investigators analyzed nine additional factors along with the four identified in the previous study. Those were donor age, recipient gender, history of previous transplant, log total bilirubin, prothrombin time, aspartate transaminase, recipient HCV positivity, and warm and cold organ ischemia time.

Analysis showed that eight factors predicted posttransplant patient survival: donor age, recipient age, log creatinine, log total bilirubin, prothrombin time, previous transplant, and warm and cold ischemia time. The journal paper includes a formula for calculating the mortality risk score.

"An important aspect of this model is that it is applicable to both HCV and non-HCV patients," the investigators comment. They validated the model statistically and demonstrated that its mortality risk scores correlated with patient survival rates.

The authors conclude that "a balanced organ allocation system that considers both disease severity as assessed by MELD and expected survival as assessed by [the new model] would maximize the patients' survival benefits following liver transplantation."

 

Potential Therapy Reported for Children, Adults with End-Stage Liver Disease

By Carrie Wingate, Ph.D.


Researchers from Johns Hopkins in Baltimore recently reported findings that administration of a single chemical, methionine sulfoximine (MSO), to rats protected them from the effects of hyperammonemia, or excessive levels of ammonia in the blood. These findings are significant for human patients with liver disease, because in its final stages the condition leads to swelling of a type of brain cells called astrocytes, often leading to coma and death.

As the liver begins to fail, it can no longer process ammonia, which is a normally produced by the body as a by-product of other processes. The resulting hyperammonemia causes the formation of glutamine. Experimental evidence suggests that astrocytes begin to swell when glutamine accumulates in them and then attracts water as well. This swelling (encephalopathy) puts pressure on the brain and interrupts its normal functions.

MSO is known to prevent the formation of glutamine. In the animal study, the researchers pretreated rats with MSO and then induced hyperammonemia. When compared to rats that had not been treated first with MSO, the treated rats showed no swelling in their astrocytes or in their brains in general, and none of the animals showed any signs of brain damage.

The researchers hope to begin clinical trials of MSO in humans within a year.

Copyright (c) 2002 Acurian Inc. All Rights Reserved.

This article is a summation of material that is no longer accessible on the Acurian site. All facts, details and references remain consistent with the original material.

 
Reviewed Feb 2004
HOME Liver Cancer
FAQ Great Place To Start Autoimmune Hepatitis
Have You Just Been Diagnosed ? Other Medical Conditions & HCV
Glossary HCV Worldwide News & Research
History Of HCV HCV News Archives 2001-2002
Your Liver Functions Internet Conference Reports on All New and Current HCV Therapies
Symptoms Of HCV Nutrition & HCV
Transmission Of HCV Interviews: Members & Professionals
Sex And HCV HCV Support Groups Listed By State
Understanding Your Blood Tests  Labs Transplant Support Groups Listed By State
Monitoring Blood Work On Treatment Insurance, Financial Aid & Free Meds
Liver Biopsy Understanding Your Results How to Find a Doctor & What to Ask
Viral Loads Members Share Their First Shot Experience
Genotypes Shared Stories From Our  Members
Infergen Your Questions & HCV
 Inhibitors &  New Therapies Chat Room & Message Boards
Peg Intron & Pegasys Books On HCV
Help With Side Effects During Treatment Food For The Soul Inspirational Stories
Drug Interactions & Treatment Informative Links
Latest HCV Trials Pictures Of Our Members
Liver Fibrosis What's New at Janis and Friends
Cirrhosis Sign Our Guestbook
Transplants Contact Us mailto:JansDream@angelhaven.com
Current Transplant Research In Memory Of Janis