| |
October 9, 2002
BETHESDA, MD-The NIH today
announced the
Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver
Transplant Cohort Study (A2ALL), to take place at 10 U.S. centers over the
next 7 years. The national project will investigate the experience of a
group of patients eligible for living donor liver transplantation, focusing
on the factors influencing outcomes of living donor liver transplants for
both donors and recipients. Researchers will compare outcomes of this new
procedure with the outcomes for patients who receive livers from cadavers.
"Our goal is to gather accurate data in a disciplined, careful way so we can
give liver transplant patients and potential donors solid information about
the risks and benefits of this innovative and controversial procedure," says
Jean Emond, M.D., chief of transplantation services at Columbia University
and a co-chair of the study. Carl L. Berg, M.D., director of hepatology at
the University of Virginia, is also a co-chair. In addition to vital
clinical issues, the A2ALL will investigate important research issues such
as liver regeneration, liver cancer, and infectious hepatitis.
Liver transplantation is the only cure and a life-saving measure for people
with end-stage liver disease. Although liver transplants have become
relatively common in the United States in recent decades, in 2001 some
17,000 patients waited for livers to be donated, while fewer than 5,000
cadaveric livers were actually donated that year. The shortage of cadaveric
organs has led surgeons to look to live donors to close that gap. The liver
is a large segmented organ that can potentially be split without harm to the
donor and with benefit to the recipient. Because the liver, unlike most
organs, has a remarkable ability to regenerate, the donor's remaining liver
grows to its original size within weeks. Likewise, the donated lobe will
also grow in the recipient's body.
For children in need of liver transplantation, living donor transplantation
from an adult has been very successful and has become an accepted medical
option. Adults in need of liver transplantation require a larger segment, as
much as half or more of the donor's liver. This requires a more extensive
and complex surgery, with potentially greater risks for the donor and the
recipient. The procedure has evolved so rapidly that over half of the living
donor transplants performed to date have occurred since 2000. Evaluation of
donors as well as surgical procedures vary from one transplant center to
another. Although the large majority of living donor liver transplants have
been successful, there are few data to inform potential donors about risks.
Post-surgical problems for donors can include infection, pneumonia, and
leaking bile, which can require further surgery.
Because the procedure is expanding across the country, a group of concerned
doctors called for more research on risks and benefits and an outside
regulator to certify hospitals that would perform the procedure in the New
England Journal of Medicine (April 4, 2002). They also asked for uniform
medical criteria in picking donors and recipients. "There is no regulation
of surgical interventions. The A2ALL study can break new ground in shaping
the way we approach transplant surgery," adds Robert Merion, M.D., study
chair and leader of the data coordinating center at the University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor.
"The NIH, with assistance from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
(ASTS) and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), expects
A2ALL to provide much-needed data about what works best in this emerging
surgical field," explains James Everhart, M.D., M.P.H., of the National
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, which is funding
the study along with the ASTS and HRSA. "Transplant surgeons place a great
deal of importance on the well-being of both donors and recipients. This
partnership with NIDDK should give us solid data for the high quality
patient care we all want to provide," adds James Schulak, M.D., ASTS
president. HRSA, like the NIH, is a component of the Department of Health
and Human Services.
Editors: A list of Centers, Principal Investigators, and Media contacts is
listed below.
# # #
Contact:
Jane DeMouy
301-435-8115
Leslie Curtis
301-496-3583
CALIFORNIA, Los Angeles
University of California, LA
Ron Busuttil, M.D.
rbusutti@mednet.ucla.edu
310-825-5318
Dumont-UCLA Transplant Center
R. Mark Ghobrial, M.D.
rgobrial@mednet.ucla.edu
310-825-2678ILLINOIS, Chicago
Northwestern University
Mike Abecassis, M.D.
mabecass@nmh.org
312-695-0359
Andreas Blei, M.D.
a-blei@northwestern.edu
312-503-3453
Media Contact:
Patty Cochran, 312-926-5900
pcochra@nmh.orgPENNSYLVANIA, Philadephia
University of Pennsylvania Abraham Shaked, M.D.
abraham.shaked@uphs.upenn.edu
215-662-6723
Raj Reddy, M.D.
rajender.reddy@uphs.upenn.edu
215-349-8352
Media Contact:
Rosann Thompson, (215) 662-2560
rosann.thompson@uphs.upenn.edu
CALIFORNIA, San Francisco
University of California, SF Chris E. Freise, M.D.
friesec@surgery.ucsf.edu
415-353-1888
Norah Terrault, M.D.
noraht@itsa.ucsf.edu
415-476-2227
Media Contact:
Janet Basu, 415-476-2557
jbasu@pubaff.ucsf.eduNEW YORK, New York
Columbia University
Jean Emond, M.D. (co-chair)
je111@columbia.edu
212-305-9691
Bob Brown, M.D.
rb464@columbia.edu
212-305-0662
Media Contact:
Maile Chaffin-Quiray
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
mac9047@nyp.org
(212) 305-5587VIRGINIA, Charlottesville
University of Virginia
Carl L. Berg, M.D. (co-chair)
CLB7D@virginia.edu
434-924-2626
Timothy Pruett, M.D.
UVA Health System
tp2w@virginia.edu
434-924-9462
Media Contact:
Jennifer Chafin, 434-243-6286
JLC9D@virginia.edu
COLORADO, Denver
University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center James Trotter, M.D.
james.trotter@uchsc.edu
303-372-8866
Igal Kam, M.D.
igal.kam@uchsc.edu
303-372-8750
Media Contact:
Kendra Smith
kendra.smith@uchsc.edu
303-315-5571NORTH CAROLINA, Chapel Hill
University of North Carolina Roshan Shrestha, M.D.
R_Shrestha@med.unc.edu
Jeff Fair, M.D.
jeff_fair@med.unc.edu
919-966-8008
Media Contact:
Leslie H. Lang,
919-843-9687
llang@med.unc.eduVIRGINIA, Richmond
Virginia Commonwealth University Robert A. Fisher, M.D., F.A.C.S.
rafisher@hsc.vcu.edu
804-828-2461
Mitchell Shiffman, M.D., F.A.C.S.
mshiffma@hsc.vcu.edu
804-828-4060
Media Contact:
Joe Kuttenkuler, 804-828-6607
jpkutten@vcu.ed
DATA COORDINATING CENTER
University of Michigan
Robert M. Merion, M.D.
734-998-6611
merionb@umich.edu
Media Contact:
Krista Hopson, 734-764-2220
khopson@umich.edu
|
| |
| |
|
Acute liver failure and timing of
transplantation
Liver
transplantation
greatly improves the prognosis of patients with
fulminant liver
failure. In the United Kingdom paracetamol overdose
is now the commonest cause of acute
liver failure,
followed by seronegative (non-A, non-B, non-C)
hepatitis.
|

|
Donor
liver from
adult cut down for insertion into child recipient
|
|
 |
Liver
transplantation |
Indications and contraindications
Hepatocellular carcinoma complicates many chronic
liver diseases,
and a small tumour is not a contraindication to
transplantaton because tumour recurrence is uncommon in these
patients. However, most patients with large (>5 cm) or
multiple hepatomas or most other types of cancer are
not considered for
transplantation as tumours recur rapidly.
Patients with certain rare tumours, such as
liver metastases
from neuroendocrine disease and sarcomas, can do well
for several years. Contraindications to
liver
transplantation
include extrahepatic malignancy, severe
cardiopulmonary disease, systemic sepsis, and an inability to
comply with regular drug treatment.
| Common
indications for liver
transplantation
- Primary biliary cirrhosis
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Cryptogenic cirrhosis
- Chronic active hepatitis (usually secondary to
hepatitis B and C)
- Alcoholic liver
disease (after a period of abstinence)
|
|
Timing and selection of patients
for transplantation
The preoperative status of the patient is one of the
most important factors predicting the outcome after
transplantation.
Patients with chronic liver
disease and signs of decompensation should be assessed
for transplantation
before they become critically ill. In certain diseases,
such as primary biliary cirrhosis, quality of life
issues may form the basis for indication for
transplantation. For
example, chronic lack of energy can be debilitating in
patients with biliary cirrhosis.
| Signs of
decompensation in chronic liver
disease
- Tiredness
- Ascites
- Encephalopathy
- Peripheral oedema
- Jaundice (not always a feature)
- Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
abdominal
pain (a late sign)
- Bleeding oesophageal or gastric varices
- Low albumin concentration
- Raised prothrombin time
|
|
Acute
liver failure and timing of
transplantation
Liver
transplantation greatly
improves the prognosis of patients with fulminant
liver failure. In the
United Kingdom paracetamol overdose is now the commonest
cause of acute liver
failure, followed by seronegative (non-A, non-B, non-C)
hepatitis.
| Paracetamol
overdose
- Causes death by acute liver
failure
- Renal failure develops as a hepatorenal syndrome and by acute
tubular necrosis but is usually recoverable
- Early deaths usually result from raised intracranial pressure,
and comatose patients require monitoring in an intensive care unit
- Death in later stages can occur from multiorgan failure and
systemic sepsis
- If the patient survives without
transplantation, the
liver will recover without the development
of cirrhosis
|
| The donor organ is usually procured
as part of a multiorgan retrieval from a heart beating, brain dead
patient |
The mortality from fulminant liver
failure can be as high as 90%, whereas one year survival after urgent
transplantation is
often above 70%. In the United Kingdom, criteria developed at
King's College Hospital are used for listing patients for "super
urgent" transplantation.
This scheme relies on cooperation between the
liver
transplantation centres to
allow transplantation
within 48 hours of listing whenever possible.
Surgical procedure
Before organs are removed an exploratory laparotomy is done
on the donor to rule out any disease process (such as
unexpected carcinoma) that may preclude organ donation. The major
vessels are then dissected and blood flow controlled in
preparation for hypothermic perfusion with a cold
preservation solution. University of Wisconsin preservation
solution is used most widely. It can preserve the
liver adequately for about
13 hours, with acceptable results up to 24 hours.
Hepatectomy in the organ recipient is the most difficult part of the
operation as the patient is at risk of developing a serious
haemorrhage due to a combination of portal hypertension, defective
clotting, and fibrinolysis. Improvements in surgical technique
and anaesthesia have resulted in large reductions in blood loss,
and the average requirement for transfusion is now four units
of blood. At reimplantation, the suprahepatic and infrahepatic
inferior vena cava and the portal vein are anastomosed and the
organ is reperfused with blood. This is followed by reconstruction
of the hepatic artery and bile duct.
Postoperative management
Patients are usually managed in an intensive care unit for
the first 12-24 hours after surgery. Enteral feeding is
restarted as early as possible, and liver
function tests are done daily. Immunosuppressive protocols
usually include a combination of cyclosporin or tacrolimus
together with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and
prednisolone. The dose of steroids is rapidly tapered off,
and they can often be stopped after two to three months. The
doses of cyclosporin or tacrolimus are reduced gradually during
the first year (during which pregnancy should be avoided) and
continued at much lower levels for life.
| Side effects
of immunosuppresive drugs
| |
| Drug |
Side effect |
Monitoring |
| Cyclosporin |
Neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hypertension,
hirsutism, gum hyperplasia, diabetes |
Drug concentrations |
| Tacrolimus |
Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hair loss,
hypertension, diabetes |
Drug concentrations |
| Azathioprine |
Leucopenia, hair loss |
White blood cell count |
| Mycophenolate mofetil |
Gastrointestinal upset, leucopenia |
White blood cell count andgastrointestinal
symptoms |
| Steroids |
Osteoporosis, diabetes, cushingoid face,
hypertension |
Symptoms |
| General |
Infections, malignancy |
Liver
and renal function tests, regular follow up, and high index of
suspicion |
|
Acute rejection occurs in about half of patients, but this is easily
treated in most cases with extra steroids or by altering the
drug regimen. Despite routine use of prophylactic treatment
against bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens, infections remain
a major cause of morbidity. The side effects of the drugs are
usually well controlled before the patient leaves hospital about
two weeks after surgery.
At discharge, patients need to be familiarised with the drug regimen
and side effects and educated about the warning signs of
rejection and infection. Patients are usually followed up weekly
for the first three months and then at gradually increasing
intervals thereafter.
Results
The five year survival is 60-90%, depending on the primary
disease and the clinical state of the patient before
transplantation. The newer
antiviral drugs plus the preoperative and postoperative
adjuvant therapies for malignancies should lead to further
improvements in survival. Although alcoholic
liver disease remains a controversial
indication for transplantation,
carefully selected patients do well.
After successful transplantation
patients have a greatly improved lifestyle and are often able to return
to work and normal social activities. However, some patients
experience medical and social problems. Drug compliance is
one of the biggest problems after all types of organ
transplantation. Poor
compliance leads to chronic rejection and loss of the graft.
An extensive network of support services is available to help
liver transplant patients.
These include the transplant team, referring physician,
general practitioner, social services, and local
liver patient support
groups. Shared care protocols operate in most regions, with
most patients cared for primarily by their general
practitioner and a gastroenterologist at their local hospital.
The mainstay of follow up is regular
liver function tests to detect any
dysfunction of the transplant. Regular discussion of concerns
with the transplant team is essential, and many problems can be
sorted out by telephone.
Paediatric liver
transplantation
In children, the most common indication for
liver
transplantation is biliary
atresia, often after failure to respond to a portoenterostomy.
Most children who need a liver
transplant are young (under 3 years) and small (<20 kg). Size
matched donors are in short supply, and reduced size ("cut down")
and split (where one liver
is split between two recipients) liver
techniques have been used to overcome this problem. Donation of
the left lobe of the liver
by a living relative is also possible.
| The shortage of child
liver donors has been
partly resolved by using smaller sections of adult
livers, usually the
left lobe |
|
|
|
New Model
Identifies Patients With Best Chance of Surviving Liver Transplant
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Oct 04 - Researchers at the University of
California at Los Angeles have developed a mathematical model for
predicting postoperative survival of liver transplant patients.
The recently adopted criteria for organ allocation, the Model
for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), are biased toward urgency of
need, not the efficiency of organ use, Dr. Ronald W. Busuttil and
colleagues point out in Annals of Surgery for September. "The
current era of severe organ shortage and mounting deaths on the
waiting list argue for optimizing outcome by transplantation of
nonurgent low-risk patients," they maintain.
The researchers previously developed a survival model based on
findings from 510 adults transplanted at their center between 1990
and 2000 for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis
C virus (HCV) infection. They considered 19 donor, recipient, and
operative factors.
The four factors that proved to be significant in that
study--recipient age, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)
status, log creatinine, and donor gender--were used as the basis
of the current research on a much larger sample. Dr. Busuttil's
group analyzed data on a UNOS sample of 25,772 adults who were
transplanted between 1990 and 2000 for any ESLD diagnosis.
Because of differences between the patient populations, the
investigators analyzed nine additional factors along with the four
identified in the previous study. Those were donor age, recipient
gender, history of previous transplant, log total bilirubin,
prothrombin time, aspartate transaminase, recipient HCV positivity,
and warm and cold organ ischemia time.
Analysis showed that eight factors predicted posttransplant
patient survival: donor age, recipient age, log creatinine, log
total bilirubin, prothrombin time, previous transplant, and warm
and cold ischemia time. The journal paper includes a formula for
calculating the mortality risk score.
"An important aspect of this model is that it is applicable to
both HCV and non-HCV patients," the investigators comment. They
validated the model statistically and demonstrated that its
mortality risk scores correlated with patient survival rates.
The authors conclude that "a balanced organ allocation system
that considers both disease severity as assessed by MELD and
expected survival as assessed by [the new model] would maximize
the patients' survival benefits following liver transplantation."
|
Potential Therapy Reported for Children, Adults with End-Stage
Liver Disease
By Carrie Wingate, Ph.D.
Researchers from Johns Hopkins in Baltimore recently reported
findings that administration of a single chemical, methionine
sulfoximine (MSO), to rats protected them from the effects of
hyperammonemia, or excessive levels of ammonia in the blood.
These findings are significant for human patients with liver
disease, because in its final stages the condition leads to
swelling of a type of brain cells called astrocytes, often
leading to coma and death.
As the liver begins to fail, it can no longer process ammonia,
which is a normally produced by the body as a by-product of
other processes. The resulting hyperammonemia causes the
formation of glutamine. Experimental evidence suggests that
astrocytes begin to swell when glutamine accumulates in them and
then attracts water as well. This swelling (encephalopathy) puts
pressure on the brain and interrupts its normal functions.
MSO is known to prevent the formation of glutamine. In the
animal study, the researchers pretreated rats with MSO and then
induced hyperammonemia. When compared to rats that had not been
treated first with MSO, the treated rats showed no swelling in
their astrocytes or in their brains in general, and none of the
animals showed any signs of brain damage.
The researchers hope to begin clinical trials of MSO in humans
within a year.
Copyright (c) 2002 Acurian Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This article is a summation of material that is no longer
accessible on the Acurian site. All facts, details and
references remain consistent with the original material. |
|
|