September HCV 2002 News
|
Date: Wed Aug 28, 2002 1:11 am SourceURL:http://www.gastrohep.com/news/news.asp?id=1520 Researchers develop model to predict post-transplant survival in liver
Survival following liver transplantation can be accurately predicted
based Researchers from California and Pennsylvania, USA, developed a prognostic
Variables that may affect patient survival following OLT were analyzed in
The resulting patient survival model was examined and refined in both HCV
Among HCV recipients, mortality was predicted using recipient age, The above variables, in addition to donor age, total bilirubin,
prothrombin Of the 46,942 patients transplanted over the last 10 years, 25,772
patients An 8-factor model that accurately predicted survival was derived. A post-transplantation mortality index was calculated using a combination
Patient survival rates, based on model-predicted risk scores for death
and Additionally, the model accurately predicted survival outcomes for HCV
and Dr Rafik M. Ghobrial, of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los
"The balanced application of a model for liver transplant survival Ann Surg 2002; 236 (3): 315-23, Last Updated: 2002-08-27 10:01:05 -0400 (Reuters Health) By Alicia Ault NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Suppressing the immune systems of organ The researchers also found that giving recipients infusions of stem cells
The studies are being presented in Miami, Florida, at the XIX
International Tolerance means that the recipient's immune system accepts a transplanted
High-dose immunosuppression has been successful, but can make a person
more Strober and colleagues were able to wean two of four kidney transplant
Weeks before the transplant, the four donors were given drugs to boost
stem For 2 to 3 months, three patients showed signs of donor and host cell But after 5 months of being drug-free, the patients showed signs of In another study, Indian researchers transplanted kidneys into 43
patients In another study by the same group, 26 patients were drug-free 3 months
Scientists from the Thomas E. Starzl Institute at the University of On Wednesday, Starzl will report similar success rates in weaning kidney
"What we're looking at here is drastic reduction of immunosuppression,
and Several transplant experts disagreed, saying that tolerance was not that
Alan Kirk, from the National Institutes of Health, said no patient should
Copyright © 2002 Reuters Limited News from Hepatitis Week of September 8, 2002 / Vol. 2 No. 36 The studies compared GenOdyssee's nine IFN alpha variants to the currently marketed IFN alpha 2a and 2b variants in viral infectious disease models for hepatitis C and immunotherapy models for cancer. "GenOdyssee's interferons display excellent toxicity profiles and are much more specific and active than interferons 2a and 2b that are currently on the market for hepatitis C and cancer," said researcher Michael Tovey, viral oncology laboratory director at the French National Center for Scientific Research. Tovey said the significant improvements shown in preclinical results could herald a major advance in patient treatment for both conditions. Study Finding
Pegylated Interferon Superior Said Flawed The study authored by Dr. David Bernstein, director of hepatology at North Shore University Hospital in New York, reported that Pegasys appears to provide a better quality of life for hepatitis C patients (see earlierHepatitis Week story). Writing in the September issue of Hepatology, Dr. Robert S. Brown Jr., said flaws in the study weaken the researchers' conclusions, although he acknowledged that Pegasys probably does offer an advantage. The major flaw, according to Brown, is the "inappropriate" pooling of data. He said the improprieties involved the pooling of doses on the pegylated interferon side and comparing the results without doing the same for the interferon group. "Interferons have dose-dependent side effects, yet there was no consideration in the final analysis for the different dosing in each of the constituent trials," Brown said. "The different doses will impact both potential side effects and efficacy in opposite directions." "Unfortunately, this report does not meet the standards of reporting quality of life data, " Brown said. "The conclusion that Pegasys is better tolerated and offers an improved quality of life compared to interferon 2a cannot be supported without appropriate pooling of data and dose-specific comparisons." Bernstein replied that he and his colleagues strongly believe the conclusions reached in their report are valid, noting that the methodology used in the study for pooling of the data and dose-specific comparisons have been appropriate. "We have properly concluded that pegylated interferon alfa-2a at a dose of 180 µg/mL is better tolerated and offers improved health-related quality of life over standard interferon alfa-2a therapy," he said.
Maxim Advances Enrollment of
Ceplene Phase 2 Clinical Trial in Hepatitis C Nonresponder Patients
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 10, 2002-- Maxim Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq:MAXM - News; SSE:MAXM) today announced that the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) responsible for reviewing its Phase 2 trial of Ceplene (histamine dihydrochloride) for the treatment of hepatitis C nonresponder patients has concluded that there have been no safety concerns associated with the triple-drug combination of Ceplene, Peg-Intron® (peginterferon alfa-2b) and Rebetol® (ribavirin, USP). The randomized, controlled Phase 2 study is designed to compare the treatment of nonresponder hepatitis C patients with a triple-drug combination of Ceplene, Peg-Intron and Rebetol versus treatment with Peg-Intron and Rebetol combination therapy alone. The study will include up to 282 patients who failed to respond to prior therapy with the combination of interferon-alpha and ribavirin. The DSMB reported to Maxim that it has reviewed the safety data through 12 weeks of treatment for the first 41 patients enrolled in the trial, and has concluded that there have been no safety concerns and that the trial should proceed under its approved protocol. "This report from the DSMB is an important step in the development of Ceplene as this study represents the first time that Ceplene has been administered in humans in combination with Peg-Intron and Rebetol for the treatment of hepatitis C," said Philippe Prokocimer, M.D., Maxim's Vice President of Drug Development. "As with any new drug combination, patient safety is a primary concern. We are pleased that initial results from this large Phase 2 study support the feasibility of adding Ceplene to the current standard of care in an attempt to improve the treatment of hepatitis C patients who have failed prior treatments." The DSMB includes world-leading clinicians experienced in the treatment of hepatitis C who review the safety data from this Phase 2 clinical trial on an ongoing basis. Maxim is conducting the Phase 2 trial under an agreement whereby Schering Corp., a division of Schering-Plough Corp., is contributing two of its products, Peg-Intron and Rebetol, and performing the viral testing for the study. The Maxim Phase 2 trial is designed to evaluate the Ceplene triple-drug combination therapy for the treatment of nonresponder patients infected with hepatitis C who failed to respond to prior therapy. Patients will be treated for up to 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary measures of efficacy in the study are sustained complete viral response and sustained biochemical response (normalization of the liver enzyme ALT, a standard measure of liver function) at 72 weeks. The trial is being conducted in Western Europe and Israel. Hepatitis C Hepatitis C is the leading blood-borne infection in the United States. The U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that over 4.5 million Americans are infected with the hepatitis C virus. The World Health Organization and other sources estimate that at least 200 million people are infected worldwide. Hepatitis C is a viral infection in which oxidative stress causes inflammation and tissue damage in the liver and, in many cases, permanent cirrhosis (scarring). The cycle of disease from infection to significant liver damage can take 20 years or more. Some experts estimate that without substantial improvements in treatment, deaths from hepatitis C will surpass those from HIV. Hepatitis C is the leading cause of liver cancer and the primary reason for liver transplantation in many countries. The standard treatment for hepatitis C is interferon-alpha, an immunotherapeutic agent given in combination with the anti-viral drug ribavirin. The most recent advance in hepatitis C therapy approved for sale is a pegylated, or sustained release, formulation of interferon-alpha given in combination with ribavirin. Even with recent advances, approximately half of patients still do not attain a sustained response with current therapies. "While we need to continue to improve the treatment available to all hepatitis C patients, the largest unmet need today is patients who have failed prior therapy," stated Larry G. Stambaugh, Maxim's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "The steady accumulation of patients over the past several years who have failed existing therapies has resulted in a large population of patients in need of the next generation of treatment, and this group is the focus of our current Phase 2 trial." Overview of Ceplene and Maxim Pharmaceuticals Research has shown that oxygen free radicals released by certain immune cells can suppress the immune system and damage normal tissue, a process commonly referred to as oxidative stress. Oxidative stress, implicated in numerous diseases, is most pronounced in the liver and can damage or destroy liver tissue in patients with hepatitis and other chronic liver diseases. Ceplene, based on the naturally occurring molecule histamine, has been shown in preclinical work to prevent the production and release of oxygen free radicals, thereby reducing oxidative stress. Accordingly, treatment with Ceplene has the potential to prevent or reverse damage induced by oxidative stress, thereby protecting critical cells and tissues, including the liver. In addition to hepatitis C, Ceplene is currently being tested in Phase 3 clinical trials for advanced metastatic melanoma and acute myelogenous leukemia, and Phase 2 trials of Ceplene have been completed in advanced renal cell carcinoma (kidney cancer). Clinical trials are also planned in chronic liver diseases such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). More than 1,400 patients have participated in the company's completed and ongoing clinical trials. Ceplene is an investigational drug and has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or any international regulatory agency. Maxim Pharmaceuticals is a global biopharmaceutical company with a diverse pipeline of therapeutic candidates for life-threatening cancers, hepatitis C and other chronic liver diseases. Maxim's research and development programs are designed to provide hope to patients most in need by developing safe and effective product candidates that extend survival while maintaining quality of life. Maxim has attracted an experienced international management group and a team of employees dedicated to commercializing life-enhancing product candidates. Joining this motivated team in its mission are world-leading scientific and clinical investigators and major pharmaceutical development partners. In addition to Ceplene, Maxim is also developing small-molecule inhibitors and activators of programmed cell death, also known as apoptosis, that may serve as drug candidates for cancer, cardiovascular disease and other degenerative diseases. Furthermore, the company's MaxDerm(TM) technology is designed for the treatment of medical conditions for which topical therapy is appropriate such as oral mucositis, herpes, decubitus ulcers, shingles, burns and related conditions. This news release contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding the efficacy and intended utilization of Ceplene, the apoptosis modulator compounds and MaxDerm, and regarding the Company's clinical trials. Such statements are only predictions and the Company's actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such differences include the risk that products that appeared promising in early research and clinical trials do not demonstrate safety or efficacy in larger-scale clinical trials, the risk that the Company will not obtain approval to market its products, the risk that clinical trials may not commence when planned, and the risks associated with the dependence upon collaborative partners. These factors and others are more fully discussed in the Company's periodic reports and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Note: Ceplene(TM), MaxDerm(TM) and the Maxim logo are trademarks of the Company. Editor's Note: This release is also available on the Internet at http://www.maxim.com.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact: SciClone Pharmaceutical
To Test Combination Of Unapproved Drugs WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- SciClone Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NasdaqNM:SCLN - News) said it will save about $20 million through a deal struck with Swiss drug giant Roche AG , which will provide its Pegasys interferon free of charge for clinical trials with SciClone's Zadaxin immune system enhancer to treat the hepatitis C virus. But SciClone now finds itself in an odd spot because it enrolled patients for a trial to test its Zadaxin as a combination therapy with Pegasys pegylated interferon, although neither has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. SciClone has warned in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that if Pegasys isn't approved by the FDA, the company would need to repeat the Zadaxin HCV trial with an approved interferon, causing delays and increased expenses. The company is conducting a phase 3 trial in the U.S. of Zadaxin to boost the effects of interferon in patients with the hepatitis C virus, or HCV, who previously didn't respond to interferon therapy. HCV is a chronic infection that attacks the liver. The pegylated form of interferon remains in the body longer, cutting down the number of doses. A Roche spokeswoman said the company would provide Pegasys for the trial at no charge to SciClone if SciClone shares its trial data with Roche. SciClone Chief Financial Officer Rick Waldron told Dow Jones Newswires the company will test Zadaxin in 1,000 patients it plans to enroll in a multi- center, placebo-controlled trial for HCV. "Using two unapproved drugs is rare but the FDA cleared (the trial)," Waldron said. An FDA spokeswoman said it isn't unheard of for the agency to allow trials of a combination of two unapproved products as long as the company has sufficient data from preclinical tests showing the drugs are safe. Under FDA rules, even if two drugs weren't approved on an individual basis, they could be packaged together and sold as one therapy if the agency found the drugs were safe and effective and approved them in combination. Minor Risks Exist In July, the FDA gave priority review designation to Pegasys in combination with ribavirin for the treatment of HCV and Roche has said it expects U.S. approval by the end of the year for the drug. But recently no marketing application has been a sure bet with the FDA. Waldron said he expects approval of Pegasys by the end of the year, and though there is a small risk that Pegasys wouldn't be approved, it still is a risk, so SciClone had to include it in its filings with the SEC. Pegasys was approved in June by the European Union. Waldron said Zadaxin is already approved in 28 countries, mostly developing countries, and generated about $14 million in sales during 2001, mainly for the treatment of hepatitis B. H.C. Wainwright analyst Ron Opel said it is difficult to gauge the risk from the Roche deal because he doesn't follow Roche and has no insight on the odds for approval of Pegasys, but he said he has heard from Pegasys users who found the product superior to Schering-Plough Corp.'s PEG-Intron, a pegylated interferon that already has FDA approval. It is important for SciClone to break into the U.S. market with Zadaxin, Opel said, because the level of third-party reimbursement in the U.S. offers a much greater market opportunity than SciClone has found so far in places like China. The analyst rated the company a speculative buy, stating that buy is the firm's second-highest rating, but SciClone is considered speculative because of its small market capitalization. Opel's firm did investment banking for SciClone more than two years ago. Multiple Drugs A More Common Approach Using multiple drugs to treat disease has become more common in recent years, particularly since the success of using drug cocktails to treat HIV/AIDS. Currently, HCV patients usually get a combination of interferon and ribavirin. Schering-Plough currently sells PEG-Intron in combination with Rebetol, a ribavirin licensed from Ribapharm Inc. (NYSE:RNA - News) , for HCV treatment. Aside from its collaboration with SciClone, Roche is seeking approval of Pegasys for the treatment of HCV in combination with its own version of ribavirin, though Ribapharm recently sued Roche in the U.S. and Europe alleging infringement of its ribavirin patent. Schering-Plough's sales of Intron/Ribavirin products, which are mainly used for HCV, totaled $659 million for the quarter ended June 30, according to a company filing with the SEC. Waldron said SciClone originally planned to test Zadaxin with alpha interferon but waited until the company could get access to longer lasting pegylated interferon. The company was concerned pegylated products would take over the HCV market and feared it would get approval for Zadaxin in combination with something patients no longer used. Though SciClone spoke to Schering-Plough as well as Roche, Roche's offer was difficult to refuse from a business standpoint, Waldron said. Due in part to the deal, as well as the revenue from foreign sales, SciClone didn't need to partner with a larger company to fund the trials and so expects to keep a larger percentage of any Zadaxin revenue. Ironically, Zadaxin was originally developed at Roche. However, Roche was also developing interferon at the time and put off Zadaxin, Waldron said. SciClone eventually acquired all the rights to the drug for about $3.2 million in 1998, according to SEC filings. Waldron said Zadaxin works in several ways to boost the immune system against HCV. The injectable product, a manufactured version of a naturally occurring substance, helps stem cells differentiate into virus-fighting immune system cells. The drug also helps ease potential side effects by working to prevent the immune system from fighting the effects of interferon therapy. SciClone's trial, which started patient enrollment in April, is planned for 500 patients with HCV but no liver cirrhosis and 500 HCV patients with some cirrhosis. It will take about two years to complete the trial and organize the data for regulatory filings with the FDA. A Roche spokeswoman said the company could benefit from a Zadaxin approval but doesn't get any rights to Zadaxin through its deal with SciClone. Waldron said other HCV treatments are needed on the market as interferon and ribavirin combinations only work for about 30% of HCV patients with the highest viral loads - those with the highest number of virus copies in their blood. SciClone is focusing its Zadaxin testing on this group. SciClone has yet to partner with a big drug maker, but it will need to establish some kind of partnership because of the size of the HCV market, Waldron said. SciClone plans to see what results the clinical trials yield before it gets into any partnering discussions. -By Christopher Scinta, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-628-7699; chris.scinta@dowjones.com Oklahoma Hospital Nurse Reused
Needles on Patients NORMAN (Reuters) - Six people contracted hepatitis at an Oklahoma hospital and about 350 other patients were undergoing tests after a nurse at the facility reused hypodermic needles, a hospital spokesman said on Wednesday.
Six patients at Norman Regional Hospital, near Oklahoma City, became infected with hepatitis C virus from the tainted needles, he said. Officials said nurse-anesthetist James C. Hill admitted reusing needles while injecting pain medication in patients, from December 31, 2001 through August 19 of this year. "We have seen approximately 350 individuals who could possibly have been exposed," hospital spokesman Grant Farrimond said. "The hospital has contacted those individuals and offered to test them at their convenience." About 200 have been tested so far, he added. Farrimond said that in addition to hepatitis C and B testing, exposed patients were also being tested for HIV ( news - web sites) infection. Hill and his supervising physician have been removed from the hospital and their privileges have been revoked, Farrimond noted. A lawsuit was filed in Norman on Wednesday against Hill and the supervising physician Dr. Jerry W. Lewis, by a patient who received injections at the clinic. The hospital said Hill used the same needle for at least 15 patients a day, but would not speculate why he reused needles. The lawsuit is charging the nurse with negligent and malicious behavior. Farrimond said the pain clinic, which operated in the hospital, was privately staffed and operated by Lewis. http://www.nrp-euro.com/news/view_newsitem.aspx?ItemID=236 Roche's ribavirin Copegus
available in all EU Countries within months Deaths of Hepatitis C
Patients in Japan Prompt Label Change in Rebetol Schering-Plough distributes Rebetol capsules in addition to its interferon drug known as Intron A. Both drugs are used together to treat hepatitis C. Intron A already bears precautionary language in Japan against its use in hepatitis C patients with diabetes and/or hypertension. "Essentially, there have been reports of four cases of cerebral hemorrhages leading to two deaths of patients taking interferon A and ribavirin in Japan," Schering-Plough spokesman Robert Consalvo told Medical Week. "All four patients had a history of hypertension. Two patients who died also had diabetes." Although uncertain about why the deaths occurred, Consalvo said the deaths in Japan should not be a cause of concern for people who use the drugs in the United States since no deaths or adverse events have been reported here. As a result, he said no plans exist to change the drug's label in the United State or in Europe. "Intron A has been on the market here since the 1980s," said Consalvo, noting that adverse events of such magnitude were not seen in the studies that supported approval of the drug either alone or in combination with Rebetol. "These are new cases and the Japanese authorities felt it was important to add this harmonized labeling," he added. Consalvo said the new labeling makes it clearer "that you need to take precautions in patients with these conflicting conditions." He said the treatment environment that exists in Japan for this combination therapy is very different in Japan than in the United States or Europe. In Japan, Consalvo said Rebetol and Intron A are only supposed to be administered to hepatitis C patients while they are in hospitals. He also noted that Intron A is given to hepatitis C patients in significantly higher doses in Japan than in the United States or Eurspark1the use of Intron A with Rebetol was just launched in Japan late last year. Other sources: Schering-Plough HIV Meds May Carry Small Risk
of Heart Arrhythmias NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Recent reports have suggested that certain types of anti-HIV ( news - web sites) drugs can cause abnormal heart rhythms, or arrhythmias, but if this is indeed true, the risk appears to be incredibly low, according to infectious disease experts.
The reports have concerned protease inhibitors, an essential component of the drug cocktail used to fight HIV infection. While prescribing information for these drugs warns that they can cause arrhythmias when given with certain other drugs, it is unclear whether protease inhibitors can cause such disturbances on their own. Three years ago, Drs. Paul E. Sax and Raphael J. Landovitz of Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts published a case report suggesting a link between use of nelfinavir (Viracept) and the development of an arrhythmia. The case involved a 45-year-old HIV-infected man who was switched from a regimen containing indinavir to one containing nelfinavir. Twelve hours after changing to the new regimen, the patient began experiencing palpitations and testing revealed a type of abnormal heart rhythm called bradycardia. The patient had no personal or family history of cardiac problems, including arrhythmias. After stopping all antiretroviral drugs, the rhythm disturbance resolved. But when the patient was given nelfinavir alone a few weeks later, the arrhythmia returned immediately. "I am convinced, without a doubt, that nelfinavir caused the patient's bradycardia," Sax told Reuters Health. "Since then, however, I have seen no other cases of arrhythmia possibly related to protease inhibitor use; and I work at a center that sees a lot of HIV-infected patients," he added. Sax noted that he had heard anecdotal reports of protease inhibitor-related arrhythmias from other physicians, but acknowledged that the risk of such rhythm disturbances with these drugs is probably extremely low. More recently, Dr. Shinichi Oka from the International Medical Center of Japan in Tokyo and colleagues reported two cases of serious arrhythmias possibly related to use of lopinavir-ritonavir. Both patients had hemophilia and were also infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), the authors note. Shortly after starting lopinavir-ritonavir for the first time, arrhythmias were observed in both patients. The rhythm disturbances resolved after lopinavir-ritonavir was discontinued. When one patient was given lopinavir-ritonavir several days later, the arrhythmia returned. "After submitting our paper, we have (encountered) another two patients who were treated with lopinavir-ritonavir and had bradycardia," Oka told Reuters Health. It is unclear if lopinavir-ritonavir actually caused these arrhythmias, according to Dr. Scott Brun, a researcher for Abbott Park, Illinois-based Abbott Laboratories, which produces the drug under the trade name Kaletra. "There were a number of confounding factors that may explain the association," Scott told Reuters Health. "HCV infection can affect cardiac conduction and the patients were on a number of concomitant medications that may have played a role," he added. Also, he noted, levels of certain immune-system cells were very low, suggesting that the patients might have HIV-related heart damage. After becoming aware of the case reports, "we reviewed our data of more than 10,000 patients treated with Kaletra and we were unable to identify any patients who experienced serious bradyarrhythmias," Scott stated. While protease inhibitors appear to have little or no rhythm disturbance-producing effect, recent findings suggest that they do affect cardiac anatomy and dynamics. In a study reported in July, researchers from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore used echocardiography to assess the cardiac structure and function of HIV-infected patients treated with or without protease inhibitors. The findings suggest that use of the drugs is associated with certain changes in the heart's structure and function. Lead researcher Dr. Shenghan Lai told Reuters Health that his group is planning a study with MRI scans to further investigate the drugs' effects. In the meantime, he recommends that patients taking protease inhibitors be evaluated with echocardiography, an ultrasound scan of the heart, every 6 months.
|
|
| Reviewed Feb 2004 |
|