| |
Evolution of the HALT-C Trial: Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Maintenance
Therapy for Interferon Nonresponders
The Hepatitis C
Antiviral Long-term Treatment against Cirrhosis (HALT-C)
Trial was designed to determine whether
maintenance interferon therapy could slow disease progression in
patients who had failed to eradicate hepatitis C virus (HCV) during prior
interferon treatment (nonresponders).
Ten clinical sites, a
virological testing center, and a data coordinating center (DCC) were
selected to collaborate in the design and implementation of the final
protocol.
Eligible patients had been
treated previously with interferon for at least 12 weeks, with or without
another antiviral, ribavirin, but still had persistent viremia.
Because patients had
received a variety of prior treatments, and as a perceived benefit of
enrollment, we incorporated a Lead-in period of treatment with long-acting
pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) plus ribavirin into the
study design, a combination believed to be more effective but not approved
by the Food and Drug Administration at the Trial's inception.
If patients failed to
achieve clearance of virus from the blood after 20 weeks of this Lead-in
therapy, they were entered into the main trial at week 24 and randomized to
receive either a lower dose of pegylated interferon weekly alone or no
further therapy for an additional 3 1/2 years.
The original protocol was
amended later in three respects to improve enrollment and to adapt to Food
and Drug Administration approval of the Lead-in therapy, including allowing
patients to proceed directly to the randomized part of the study if
treatment resembling the Lead-in had been completed.
The protocol changes
enhanced enrollment while upholding the original goals of the study and its
integrity.
10/25/04
Reference
W M Lee and others (The HALT-C Trial Group). Evolution of the HALT-C Trial:
pegylated interferon as maintenance therapy for chronic hepatitis C in
previous interferon nonresponders.
Controlled Clinical Trials
25(5): 472-492. October 2004.
Index to
Hepatitis C News Articles by Topic [ A -- Z ]
Roche and Pharmasset Inc Will Jointly Develop Next
Generation Anti-HCV Drug PSI- 6130, an HCV Polymerase Inhibitor, in
Combination with Pegasys/Copegus
By
Ronald Baker, PhD
Only about
half of all patients with
HCV
genotype 1
who use one of the peginterferons plus ribavirin experience a
sustained
virologic response
and are “cured” of
chronic hepatitis C.
Although FDA-approval of the pegylated interferons has significantly
improved clinical outcomes for people with chronic hepatitis C, there
remains a pressing need for more effective and less toxic therapies.
Unfortunately, no new anti-HCV therapies are expected to become available
for several years, at the earliest.
It is in
this somewhat bleak environment that Roche and Pharmasset announced on
October 27 a partnership to develop an orally administered nucleoside
polymerase inhibitor for use with
peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys)
plus ribavirin (Copegus)
in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Specifically,
the two companies have agreed to jointly develop and market PSI-6130, the
lead nucleoside polymerase inhibitor compound of the new partnership.
According to
the announcement from Roche,
Pharmasset will receive an
upfront fee, research and development support, and milestone payments that
could total $168 million for PSI-6130. In addition, Pharmasset will receive
royalties on product sales and retain certain co-promotion rights in the
U.S.
PSI-6130
PSI-6130 is
now in “advanced pre-clinical stage testing,” according to Abel De La Rosa,
Senior Vice President of Business and Strategy at Pharmasset: “We are
excited about this compound, which has direct antiviral activity against HCV,”
De La Rosa told HIV and Hepatitis.com in a telephone interview. “Our
hope is that PSI-6130 will demonstrate greater effectiveness against HCV,
especially when used in combination with Pegasys and Copegus,” he said.
Assuming
development of the drug moves forward smoothly and without interruption,
using PSI-6130 or its prodrugs in combination with peginterferon and
ribavirin could greatly benefit
nonresponders
to current therapies, according to De La Rosa.
When asked
about the available data on 6130, De La Rosa said no data on the drug have
yet been presented at any scientific meetings, “but we hope to see a release
of data perhaps in time for the 2005 AASLD conference,” he added.
CEOs Viewpoints
“Roche has already
established itself in hepatitis C with Pegasys, the most prescribed
hepatitis C medication in the U.S. This collaboration with Pharmasset
demonstrates our ongoing commitment to advancing therapy for hepatitis C
patients with unmet needs,” said George Abercrombie, President and CEO,
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. “We hope that further research and development will
show that PSI-6130 is an important new hepatitis C treatment option that
complements Pegasys and Copegus.”
“Pharmasset’s expertise in nucleoside drug discovery and early stage
clinical development, combined with Roche’s proven track record in bringing
new and improved hepatitis C therapies to market is a formula for success,”
said Schaefer Price, Pharmasset’s President and CEO. “The economics
of this deal are significant. In addition, this partnership will support
Pharmasset’s activities toward establishing a commercial infrastructure for
our HIV and HCV clinical candidates.”
Pharmasset
has two anti-HIV compounds now in Phase II testing,
Reverset
and
Racivir,
which are expected to be on the market as prescription drugs for HIV in late
2005. “The company is committed to continuing our strong focus on the
development of drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C and for HIV
infection,” De La Rosa told
HIV and Hepatitis.com.
Under the
terms of the agreement, Roche will gain the worldwide rights, excluding
Latin America and
Korea, to Pharmasset’s PSI-6130 and its prodrugs.
Pharmasset will be
responsible for preclinical work, investigational new drug (IND) filings,
and phase I proof of concept studies, with Roche managing other preclinical
studies and clinical development. Roche will also receive options to related
nucleoside polymerase inhibitors, which, if exercised, could result in
Pharmasset receiving in excess of $300 million in total milestones under the
agreement.
Pharmasset will continue
to develop and retain worldwide rights to ongoing and future hepatitis C
programs unrelated to the PSI-6130 series of nucleoside polymerase
inhibitors. In addition, the Roche Venture Fund has made a $4 million
investment in Pharmasset and has received warrants to purchase an additional
$6 million in shares within the next two years at a premium price.
About HCV
Hepatitis C is a
blood-borne infectious disease of the liver and the leading cause of
cirrhosis and liver cancer and the number one reason for liver transplants
in the U.S. An estimated 2.7 million Americans are chronically infected with
hepatitis C.
About
Pegasys
Pegasys, the most
prescribed pegylated alfa interferon in the U.S., and Copegus were approved
by the FDA in December 2002 for use in combination for the treatment of
adults with chronic hepatitis C who have compensated liver disease and have
not previously been treated with interferon alfa. Patients in whom efficacy
was demonstrated included patients with compensated liver disease and
histological evidence of cirrhosis.
HIV and Hepatitis.com
Articles on Pegasys and Copegus
About Pharmasset
Pharmasset,
Inc., is an emerging pharmaceutical company committed to the discovery,
development, and commercialization of novel antiviral drugs. The company
leverages its expertise in nucleoside chemistry to develop therapeutics to
combat infections caused by drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) and hepatitis viruses. Pharmasset has two drugs in Phase II clinical
trials, Reverset and Racivir and several other antiviral compounds in
advanced preclinical studies.
In September
2003, Pharmasset entered into a collaborative licensing agreement with
Incyte Corporation for the development and commercialization of Reverset in
certain territories. Pharmasset retains proprietary development and
commercialization rights to the balance of its clinical and preclinical
pipeline. Pharmasset’s expanding portfolio of antiviral therapeutics aims to
improve the lives of individuals around the world.
About Roche
Hoffmann-La
Roche Inc. (Roche), based in Nutley, N.J., is the U.S. prescription drug
unit of the Roche Group, a leading research-based health care enterprise
that ranks among the world's leaders in pharmaceuticals and diagnostics.
For more
information on the Roche pharmaceuticals business in the United States,
visit the company's web site at:
http://www.rocheusa.com
Facts About Pegasys (Peginterferon alfa-2a) in
Combination with Copegus Indication
Pegasys, a pegylated alfa interferon, alone or in combination
with Copegus
(ribavirin) is indicated for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis
C who have compensated liver disease and have not previously been treated
with interferon alfa. Patients in whom efficacy was demonstrated included
patients with compensated liver disease and histological evidence of
cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A).
Dosing and Administration
Pegasys, a premixed solution, is dosed at 180mcg as a subcutaneous injection
once a week. Copegus, available as a 200mg tablet, is administered at 800 to
1200mg taken twice daily as a split dose. The two products are sold
separately.
Combination Therapy Clinical Studies
The two combination
therapy pivotal study findings:
Study 5,
published in the March 2, 2004 Annals of Internal Medicine, including
1,284 patients receiving medication, showed that patients with certain
genotypes (strains) of the hepatitis C virus should be treated with
different dosing regimens of Pegasys and Copegus. The treatment regimens and
resulting sustained virological response rates for these groups treated with
Pegasys and Copegus therapy were:
Genotype 1:
48 week duration with 1000 – 1200mg Copegus: 51 percent
Genotype non-1:
24 week duration with 800mg Copegus: 82 percent
Study 4,
published in the September 26, 2002 New England Journal of Medicine,
including
1,121 patients receiving medication, showed that Pegasys and Copegus
combination therapy is a more effective treatment for chronic hepatitis C
than interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. The sustained virological response
rate in the Pegasys and Copegus treated patients was 53 percent compared to
44 percent in the interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin group. Sustained
virological response refers to a patient’s continued undetectable serum
hepatitis C RNA levels 24 weeks after finishing a course of treatment.
The complete
package inserts for Pegasys and Copegus are available at
www.pegasys.com,
or by calling 1-877-PEGASYS.
10/29/04
Sources
Roche
Pharmaceuticals. Roche and Pharmasset Join Forces to Develop New Generation
of Hepatitis C Therapies Collaboration Exploring Compounds for Use in
Combination with Roche’s Hep C Product Pegasys. Press Release.
October 27, 2004.
R Baker.
Telephone Interview with Abel De La Rosa, Vice President of Business and
Strategy, Pharmasset Inc. October 28, 2004.
By
Ronald Baker, PhD
Only about
half of all patients with
HCV
genotype 1
who use one of the peginterferons plus ribavirin experience a
sustained
virologic response
and are “cured” of
chronic hepatitis C.
Although FDA-approval of the pegylated interferons has significantly
improved clinical outcomes for people with chronic hepatitis C, there
remains a pressing need for more effective and less toxic therapies.
Unfortunately, no new anti-HCV therapies are expected to become available
for several years, at the earliest.
It is in
this somewhat bleak environment that Roche and Pharmasset announced on
October 27 a partnership to develop an orally administered nucleoside
polymerase inhibitor for use with
peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys)
plus ribavirin (Copegus)
in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Specifically,
the two companies have agreed to jointly develop and market PSI-6130, the
lead nucleoside polymerase inhibitor compound of the new partnership.
According to
the announcement from Roche,
Pharmasset will receive an
upfront fee, research and development support, and milestone payments that
could total $168 million for PSI-6130. In addition, Pharmasset will receive
royalties on product sales and retain certain co-promotion rights in the
U.S.
PSI-6130
PSI-6130 is
now in “advanced pre-clinical stage testing,” according to Abel De La Rosa,
Senior Vice President of Business and Strategy at Pharmasset: “We are
excited about this compound, which has direct antiviral activity against HCV,”
De La Rosa told HIV and Hepatitis.com in a telephone interview. “Our
hope is that PSI-6130 will demonstrate greater effectiveness against HCV,
especially when used in combination with Pegasys and Copegus,” he said.
Assuming
development of the drug moves forward smoothly and without interruption,
using PSI-6130 or its prodrugs in combination with peginterferon and
ribavirin could greatly benefit
nonresponders
to current therapies, according to De La Rosa.
When asked
about the available data on 6130, De La Rosa said no data on the drug have
yet been presented at any scientific meetings, “but we hope to see a release
of data perhaps in time for the 2005 AASLD conference,” he added.
CEOs Viewpoints
“Roche has already
established itself in hepatitis C with Pegasys, the most prescribed
hepatitis C medication in the U.S. This collaboration with Pharmasset
demonstrates our ongoing commitment to advancing therapy for hepatitis C
patients with unmet needs,” said George Abercrombie, President and CEO,
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. “We hope that further research and development will
show that PSI-6130 is an important new hepatitis C treatment option that
complements Pegasys and Copegus.”
“Pharmasset’s expertise in nucleoside drug discovery and early stage
clinical development, combined with Roche’s proven track record in bringing
new and improved hepatitis C therapies to market is a formula for success,”
said Schaefer Price, Pharmasset’s President and CEO. “The economics
of this deal are significant. In addition, this partnership will support
Pharmasset’s activities toward establishing a commercial infrastructure for
our HIV and HCV clinical candidates.”
Pharmasset
has two anti-HIV compounds now in Phase II testing,
Reverset
and
Racivir,
which are expected to be on the market as prescription drugs for HIV in late
2005. “The company is committed to continuing our strong focus on the
development of drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C and for HIV
infection,” De La Rosa told
HIV and Hepatitis.com.
Under the
terms of the agreement, Roche will gain the worldwide rights, excluding
Latin America and
Korea, to Pharmasset’s PSI-6130 and its prodrugs.
Pharmasset will be
responsible for preclinical work, investigational new drug (IND) filings,
and phase I proof of concept studies, with Roche managing other preclinical
studies and clinical development. Roche will also receive options to related
nucleoside polymerase inhibitors, which, if exercised, could result in
Pharmasset receiving in excess of $300 million in total milestones under the
agreement.
Pharmasset will continue
to develop and retain worldwide rights to ongoing and future hepatitis C
programs unrelated to the PSI-6130 series of nucleoside polymerase
inhibitors. In addition, the Roche Venture Fund has made a $4 million
investment in Pharmasset and has received warrants to purchase an additional
$6 million in shares within the next two years at a premium price.
About HCV
Hepatitis C is a
blood-borne infectious disease of the liver and the leading cause of
cirrhosis and liver cancer and the number one reason for liver transplants
in the U.S. An estimated 2.7 million Americans are chronically infected with
hepatitis C.
About
Pegasys
Pegasys, the most
prescribed pegylated alfa interferon in the U.S., and Copegus were approved
by the FDA in December 2002 for use in combination for the treatment of
adults with chronic hepatitis C who have compensated liver disease and have
not previously been treated with interferon alfa. Patients in whom efficacy
was demonstrated included patients with compensated liver disease and
histological evidence of cirrhosis.
HIV and Hepatitis.com
Articles on Pegasys and Copegus
About Pharmasset
Pharmasset,
Inc., is an emerging pharmaceutical company committed to the discovery,
development, and commercialization of novel antiviral drugs. The company
leverages its expertise in nucleoside chemistry to develop therapeutics to
combat infections caused by drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) and hepatitis viruses. Pharmasset has two drugs in Phase II clinical
trials, Reverset and Racivir and several other antiviral compounds in
advanced preclinical studies.
In September
2003, Pharmasset entered into a collaborative licensing agreement with
Incyte Corporation for the development and commercialization of Reverset in
certain territories. Pharmasset retains proprietary development and
commercialization rights to the balance of its clinical and preclinical
pipeline. Pharmasset’s expanding portfolio of antiviral therapeutics aims to
improve the lives of individuals around the world.
About Roche
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
(Roche), based in Nutley, N.J., is the U.S. prescription drug unit of the
Roche Group, a leading research-based health care enterprise that ranks
among the world's leaders in pharmaceuticals and diagnostics.
For more
information on the Roche pharmaceuticals business in the United States,
visit the company's web site at:
http://www.rocheusa.com
Facts About Pegasys (Peginterferon alfa-2a) in
Combination with Copegus Indication
Pegasys, a pegylated alfa interferon, alone or in combination
with Copegus
(ribavirin) is indicated for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis
C who have compensated liver disease and have not previously been treated
with interferon alfa. Patients in whom efficacy was demonstrated included
patients with compensated liver disease and histological evidence of
cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A).
Dosing and Administration
Pegasys, a premixed solution, is dosed at 180mcg as a subcutaneous injection
once a week. Copegus, available as a 200mg tablet, is administered at 800 to
1200mg taken twice daily as a split dose. The two products are sold
separately.
Combination Therapy Clinical Studies
The two combination
therapy pivotal study findings:
Study 5,
published in the March 2, 2004 Annals of Internal Medicine, including
1,284 patients receiving medication, showed that patients with certain
genotypes (strains) of the hepatitis C virus should be treated with
different dosing regimens of Pegasys and Copegus. The treatment regimens and
resulting sustained virological response rates for these groups treated with
Pegasys and Copegus therapy were:
Genotype 1:
48 week duration with 1000 – 1200mg Copegus: 51 percent
Genotype non-1:
24 week duration with 800mg Copegus: 82 percent
Study 4,
published in the September 26, 2002 New England Journal of Medicine,
including
1,121 patients receiving medication, showed that Pegasys and Copegus
combination therapy is a more effective treatment for chronic hepatitis C
than interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. The sustained virological response
rate in the Pegasys and Copegus treated patients was 53 percent compared to
44 percent in the interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin group. Sustained
virological response refers to a patient’s continued undetectable serum
hepatitis C RNA levels 24 weeks after finishing a course of treatment.
The complete
package inserts for Pegasys and Copegus are available at
www.pegasys.com,
or by calling 1-877-PEGASYS.
10/29/04
Sources
Roche
Pharmaceuticals. Roche and Pharmasset Join Forces to Develop New Generation
of Hepatitis C Therapies Collaboration Exploring Compounds for Use in
Combination with Roche’s Hep C Product Pegasys. Press Release.
October 27, 2004.
R Baker.
Telephone Interview with Abel De La Rosa, Vice President of Business and
Strategy, Pharmasset Inc. October 28, 2004.
Blocking liver rejection following a transplant procedure
is not always an easy task for physicians. It typically requires a
cocktail of immunosuppressive drugs aimed at preventing the body's immune
system from attacking the new organ.1 From 1992 to 2001, nearly
30% of patients who underwent liver transplantation eventually rejected
their organ, though that trend is an improvement from a high of about 50%
10 years ago.2Now, doctors in
Philadelphia claim a new combination of drugs might result in even fewer
rejection episodes in liver transplant patients compared to current
therapies.3
A Drug with a Positive History
The therapy they tested is a monoclonal antibody known as basiliximab
(bas-il-IX-ih-mab), an immunosuppressive drug already used in kidney
transplantation. The therapy works by fending off the body's white blood
cells that launch an advance against the newly transplanted organ.4
Basiliximab has traditionally been given by injection.
"… In general, a kidney transplant has a tendency to
reject more aggressively than a liver transplant. Therefore, if this drug
was proven to be successful in kidneys, I thought maybe we can achieve
even better results in livers. And in fact, this was the case," explained
Ignazio Marino, MD, head of the Division of Liver Transplantation and
Hepato-biliary Surgery at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in
Philadelphia, and the study's chief investigator.
To test the hypothesis that basiliximab might also be
beneficial for men and women undergoing
liver transplant procedures, Marino and
his fellow surgeons studied the results of 50 liver transplant operations
they had performed from 2000 to 2002, using basiliximab as part of an
anti-rejection treatment protocol that also included the traditional
medication, tacrolimus (tuh-CRAW-lih-mus) and low doses of steroids.
Their study was the first to use this regimen in liver transplantation. In
the end, the study team noted a much lower incidence of liver rejection.
"We were able to prove that with the combination of this
drug with the standard immunosuppression regimen using tacrolimus,
rejections dropped from the historical rate of 40% to 12%, which is really
a striking difference," said Marino, who is also a professor of Surgery at
Thomas Jefferson University.
The results also suggest that this immunosuppression
protocol may help improve a patient's odds of survival. Eighty-eight
percent of the patients on which the study team focused were alive three
years after transplantation, Marino and his colleagues noted. That
compares to survival odds for the general liver transplant population of
78% after three years.5
The trial, he says, marks the first time that the
basiliximab protocol has been tested for its efficacy and safety in liver
transplant procedures. Marino notes that in the past 15 months of using
this combination of drugs for liver transplants at his hospital, the
chances of survival after 1 year has been 100%. Another advantage is that
high doses of tacrolimus can be toxic to the nervous system and kidneys,
and supplementing that with doses of basilixmab can reduce that risk." We
think we have much less toxicity in the short term because we use less
tacrolimus," he explains. Fewer steroids are also used in this regimen,
which decreases the risk of toxicity even further. As a result, Marino
says he and his colleagues expect fewer steroid-related complications,
which can include high blood pressure, osteoporosis, and
diabetes.
How Immunosuppression Works
Tacrolimus is a drug that suppresses the immune system by inhibiting an
enzyme that's necessary for the production of T-cells, which make up part
of the immune system. In the last decade, Marino says, researchers at the
University of Pittsburgh developed a tacrolimus-based protocol that was
considered an advance in the use of post-liver transplant
immunosuppression.6 Its use greatly decreased the reliance on
steroids, which can produce unwanted side effects. But tacrolimus produces
its own side effects, such as an increased risk of infection in some
cases, and
anemia, among others, as well as its
potential toxicity. Basiliximab inhibits the function of interleukin-2 in
the body—a chemical messenger that calls certain immune system cells into
action against a foreign invader.
"With the standard dose of 20 milligrams of basiliximab
given at the time of surgery, and another 20 milligrams four days
afterwards, you can decrease the dose of tacrolimus, and actually, you can
even postpone the time that you start tacrolimus," Marino explained.
The approach is "revolutionary", he maintained, because
rather than treating patients with aggressive immunosuppression
immediately following liver transplant, this approach is much less
aggressive, but still effective.
Targeting Hepatitis C
Another significant side effect of liver transplantation can be
potentially avoided through the use of basiliximab:
hepatitis C recurrence. "We suspect that
the recurrence of HCV is lower, though we don't have enough data to
confirm this," Marino explains. Typically, patients who undergo liver
transplantation for hepatitis experience high rates of recurrence
postoperatively.7 Perhaps basiliximab possesses some unique
mechanism that blocks HCV replication, or the ability of the virus to make
copies of itself, Marino says. That and other drugs that target
interleukin-2 have hinted that they may be able to reduce the risk of
recurrence.
"If this observation can be confirmed, it's important
news because 60 percent of the patients we transplant are diagnosed with
HCV," said Marino. "This would mean an immunosuppression that can delay
the recurrence of HCV on top of having fewer episodes of rejection and
toxicity than before."
While Marino would be interested in examining the
mechanisms that underlie basiliximab's ability to keep HCV recurrence at
bay, there is another clinical trial he has in mind first; one that would
test the use of basiliximab alone, then adding tacrolimus after the
transplant, without the use of steroids. "We are going to start this study
soon with this aim," he said.
1. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS).
2. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. University Renal Research
and Education Association. University of Michigan. Trends in incidence of
rejection at 1 year in liver transplant recipients.
3. Marino I, Doria C, Scott V et al. Efficacy and safety of basiliximab
with a tacrolimus-based regimen in liver transplant recipients.
Transplantation 2004 Sep 27;78(6):886-91.886-91.
4. Pascual J, Marcen R, Ortuno J. Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies:
basiliximab and daclizumab. Neprhol Dial Transplant 2001
Sep;16(9):1756-60.
5. Transplant Liver Registry. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS).
6. Abu-Elmagd K, Fung J, Todo S et al. The current status of hepatic
transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh. Clin Transpl
1995;145-70.
7. Davis GL. Chronic hepatitis C and liver transplantation. Rev
Gastroenterol Disord 2004 Winter;4(1):7-17.
John Martin is a long-time health journalist and an
editor for Priority Healthcare. His credits include coverage of health
news for the website of Fox Television's The Health Network, and articles
for the New York Post and other consumer and trade publications.
http://www.hepatitisneighborhood.com/content/in_the_news/archive_2083.aspx
Long-Term Outcomes in HCV with SVR:
cure, regression of fibrosis
|
| |
| |
Long term clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis C
patients with sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy:
study finds - 29% of SVRs show regression of fibrosis; HCV is curable &
long-term outcome of sustained viral responders is good; Five year
survival of European sustained virological responders was similar to the
general population, matched for age & sex and no HCCs were detected
during long term follow up.
Gut October 2004;53:1504-1508
B J Veldt1, G Saracco2, N Boyer3, C Cammà4, A Bellobuono5, U Hopf6, I
Castillo7, O Weiland8, F Nevens9, B E Hansen10 and S W Schalm1
1 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre,
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
2 Department of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Molinette, Torino, Italy
3 Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
4 Cattedra e Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia, University of
Palermo, and IBIM, Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche, Palermo, Italy
5 Ospedale Generale di zona "San Giuseppe", Milan, Italy
6 Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
7 Fundacion Estudio Hepatitis Virales, Madrid, Spain
8 Karolinska Institute, Huddinge Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden
9 University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
10 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Department of
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the
Netherlands
SVR Shows Regression of Fibrosis:
"...One hundred and twenty five patients (110 sustained virological
responders and 15 biochemical responders) underwent liver biopsy both
before and after treatment. Mean time between these two biopsies was 1.6
years. Thirty two sustained virological responders (29%) and none of the
biochemical responders showed regression of fibrosis. Progression of
fibrosis was seen in six sustained virological responders (5%) and in
three biochemical responders (20%)..."
"Cure"
"...In this study, sustained virological response was associated with a
decrease in fibrosis score. Similar findings have been reported for
sustained responders to pegylated interferon. Previous studies have
shown that regression of fibrosis can also occur in biochemical
responders and non-responders to interferon. In common with our study,
sustained virological responders show the highest rate of regression.
Because of the large proportion of sustained virological responders that
showed regression of fibrosis and the low incidence of clinical events
in these patients, in our view, non-cirrhotic patients with a sustained
virological response can be regarded as cured..."
"...A limitation of our study is that all patients had been treated with
interferon monotherapy whereas the current standard therapy for chronic
hepatitis C is pegylated interferon with ribavirin. This current
standard however dates from 2002 and long term follow up data of
peginterferon and ribavirin were not available at the time of this
study. In general, combination therapy leads to higher sustained
virological response rates and also the late relapse rate seems to
decrease...As the late relapse rate seems to decrease with newer
treatment regimens (Peginterferon), long term clinical outcomes may be
similar or even better than results obtained with interferon monotherapy.
Therefore, in our opinion, the favourable clinical outcome of sustained
virological responders is likely to hold true in the era of pegylated
interferon and ribavirin..."
ABSTRACT/SUMMARY
The key end point for treatment efficacy in chronic hepatitis C is
absence of detectable virus at six months after treatment. However, the
incidence of clinical events during long term follow up of patients with
sustained virological response is still poorly documented and may differ
between the Eastern and Western world.
The aim of this study is to assess clinical end points during long term
follow up of European patients with a sustained virological response to
interferon monotherapy.
The study methodology was a meta-analysis of individual patient data
from eight European protocolled follow up studies of interferon
treatment for chronic hepatitis C.
Results:
A total of 286 sustained virological responders and 50 biochemical
responders (detectable virus but normal alanine aminotransferase levels)
were followed up for 59 months. Fifteen sustained virological responders
(5.2%) had cirrhosis before treatment and 112 (39%) had genotype 1. The
late virological relapse rate after five years of follow up was 4.7%
(95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0--7.4) among sustained virological
responders; all late relapses occurred within four years after
treatment.
Among sustained virological responders, the rate of decompensation after
five years of follow up was 1.0% (95% CI 0.0--2.3) and none developed
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Survival was comparable with the general population, matched for age and
sex, the standard mortality ratio being 1.4 (95% CI 0.3--2.5). Clinical
outcome of patients with cirrhosis was similar to other sustained
virological responders. For biochemical responders, the rates of
development of decompensation and HCC during long term follow up were
9.1% (95% CI 0.5--17.7) and 7.1% (95% CI 0--15.0), respectively.
The authors concluded that five year survival of European sustained
virological responders was similar to the overall population, matched
for age and sex. No HCCs were detected during long term follow up.
INTRODUCTION
Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) can lead to
decompensated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
However, treatment of hepatitis C is based on surrogate end points, and
evaluation of treatment for clinical end points has only slowly been
forthcoming due to the slow course of the disease and the small number
of clinical events in patients treated for hepatitis C.
Protocolled studies use sustained virological response as the key
outcome measure for hepatitis C treatment. This sustained virological
response is defined as no detectable HCV-RNA in serum at six months
after treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the long term
clinical outcome of sustained virological responders who had been
treated in protocolled studies.
RESULTS
Study population
Data were obtained for 343 patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. A
total of 286 patients had a sustained virological response and 50 had a
biochemical response. Seven patients did not fit the entry criterion of
HCV-RNA data availability at the end of treatment and after six months
of follow up and were excluded from further analysis.
Characteristics of sustained virological responders and biochemical
responders are shown in table 1. Patients had been treated with
recombinant interferon a2a, a2b, or natural interferon monotherapy.
Patients were treated for an average duration of 39 weeks (range
11--96). Patients with genotype 1 were treated longer (mean duration 41
weeks v. 38 weeks in other genotypes; p<0.01) and received a higher
total dose of interferon (581 mega units (MU) v 525 MU in other
genotypes; p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U test).
Table 1.
| |
SVR |
Biochem resp |
p-value |
| No |
286 |
50 |
|
| Age |
41 |
45 |
0.04 |
| Male |
59% |
52% |
0.35 |
| Months Follow up |
59 |
59 |
0.99 |
| Total IFN dose(MU) |
550 |
469 |
0.05 |
| geno 1 |
39% |
42% |
0.71 |
| cirrhosis |
5.2% |
22% |
0.00 |
Sustained Virological Responders
Of 286 sustained responders, 15 patients had cirrhosis before the start
of treatment, as determined by liver biopsy.
Two patients presented with decompensated cirrhosis after 30 and 60
months of follow up (fig 1). These patients were hepatitis B surface
antigen negative and HCV-RNA negative, and no other risk factors for
liver disease were reported. The latter patient died of decompensated
cirrhosis. Five other patients died of non-liver related causes. One
patient died of lung cancer and two patients died of trauma; another
patient died of cardiovascular complications and one patient died of a
haemolytic uraemic syndrome.
The standard mortality ratio of sustained responders was 1.4 (95%
confidence interval (CI) 0.3--2.5), and there was no statistically
significant difference in mortality between sustained virological
responders and the general population, matched for age and sex.
|
|
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
| |
Biochemical responders
Fifty patients had normal transaminase levels at the end of follow up
and six months after treatment while HCV-RNA was still detectable. Of
these biochemical responders, three patients died during long term
follow up, all of liver related causes. The occurrence of decompensation
and HCC among biochemical responders was 9.1% (95% CI 0.5--17.7) and
7.1% (95% CI 0--15.0), respectively. Biochemical responders were older
and had a higher prevalence of cirrhosis. Although there was a trend to
a higher standard mortality ratio (corrected for age and sex) in
biochemical responders after five years of follow up, the difference did
not reach statistical significance.
Liver histology
One hundred and twenty five patients (110 sustained virological
responders and 15 biochemical responders) underwent liver biopsy both
before and after treatment. Mean time between these two biopsies was 1.6
years (SD 0.8). Thirty two sustained virological responders (29%) and
none of the biochemical responders showed regression of fibrosis.
Progression of fibrosis was seen in six sustained virological responders
(5%) and in three biochemical responders (20%). Baseline characteristics
of sustained virological responders and biochemical responders who
underwent two biopsies were different, with sustained virological
responders being younger (mean 39 (SD 13) v 47 (14) years), having a
lower mean pretreatment fibrosis stage (1.75 (1.1) v 2.5 (1.4)), and
having a shorter time between the two biopsies (1.5 (0.6) v 2.3 (1.5)
years). Therefore, we performed a multiple regression analysis to
determine independent risk factors for progression of fibrosis. Fibrosis
progression was associated with older age, lower pretreatment fibrosis
score, and biochemical response rather than sustained virological
response.
Late relapsers
Twelve sustained responders had a late virological relapse. In six
patients (50%), late virological relapse was accompanied by an elevation
in transaminase levels. Multivariate Cox regression analysis did not
show any pretreatment factors to be associated with an increased risk
for late virological relapse. None of the late relapsers developed
decompensation or HCC during follow up. No late virological relapses
were seen after four years of follow up, the maximal delay between the
last negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the first positive PCR
result being 12 months.
|
|
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
| |
AUTHOR DISCUSSION
This large European study allows, for the first time, an approximation
of the incidence of clinical events during long term follow up of
sustained virological responders in Europe. The most important finding
is that clinical events are rare in this population, indicating that
sustained virological responders have an excellent prognosis.
The largest European study to date describing clinical outcome in
sustained responders to interferon treatment did not report any events
among 74 patients followed up for 2.7 years. Two other European studies,
involving seven and 56 sustained responders, also showed no clinical
events during 4.6 and 5.2 years of follow up, respectively. Bruno et al
described 32 sustained responders of whom one cirrhotic patient
developed HCC.17 Although another HCC has been reported recently in a
Western sustained responder, these cases seem to be rare and limited to
patients with cirrhosis. In the present study, no HCCs occurred during
long term follow up. According to several large studies, the yearly
incidence of HCC among Japanese sustained virological responders still
varies between 0.02% and 0.5% per year; the difference in the incidence
of HCC between East and West apparently persists in conditions without
detectable viral replication.
The lowest rates in Japan were reported by Yoshida et al, with one HCC
among 817 sustained responders during 5.4 years of follow up.26 The
highest incidence of HCC reported among sustained responders in Japan
was by Kasahara et al who reported five HCCs among 313 sustained
virological responders followed up for three years.
Fifteen cirrhotic patients were included in this study. Only two
patients with decompensated cirrhosis were reported. Among untreated
cirrhotics, occurrence of clinical events of 38% (28% decompensation and
10% HCC) would be expected, according to Fattovich and colleagues. These
results suggest, but do not prove, a change in the natural course of
chronic hepatitis C. Further studies, including more cirrhotics, will be
necessary to investigate the effect of treatment on the natural course
of chronic hepatitis C.
In this study, sustained virological response was associated with a
decrease in fibrosis score. Similar findings have been reported for
sustained responders to pegylated interferon. Previous studies have
shown that regression of fibrosis can also occur in biochemical
responders and non-responders to interferon. In common with our study,
sustained virological responders show the highest rate of regression.
Because of the large proportion of sustained virological responders that
showed regression of fibrosis and the low incidence of clinical events
in these patients, in our view, non-cirrhotic patients with a sustained
virological response can be regarded as cured.
A limitation of our study is that all patients had been treated with
interferon monotherapy whereas the current standard therapy for chronic
hepatitis C is pegylated interferon with ribavirin. This current
standard however dates from 2002 and long term follow up data of
peginterferon and ribavirin were not available at the time of this
study. In general, combination therapy leads to higher sustained
virological response rates32,33 and also the late relapse rate seems to
decrease. In this study with data on interferon monotherapy, the late
relapse rate was 4.7% (95% CI 2.0--7.4); Camma et al reported 8.7% in a
meta-analysis of 14 trials with interferon monotherapy. After four years
of follow up of treatment with interferon and ribavirin, late
virological relapse rates of 3% (95% CI 1.4--4.6) and 1% (95% CI 0--2.0)
have been reported for patients treated for 24 weeks and 48 weeks,
respectively. After treatment with pegylated interferon with or without
ribavirin, a late relapse rate of 0.8% was reported after four years of
follow up. The possibility of reinfection could not be ruled out in our
cohort as data on risk behaviour and concordance of genotypes were not
available. However, introduction of more sensitive PCR methods may also
have contributed to a decrease in late virological relapse over time. It
is possible that with an insensitive assay, patients with low viraemia
are regarded as sustained virological responders.
As the late relapse rate seems to decrease with newer treatment
regimens, long term clinical outcomes may be similar or even better than
results obtained with interferon monotherapy. Therefore, in our opinion,
the favourable clinical outcome of sustained virological responders is
likely to hold true in the era of pegylated interferon and ribavirin.
In conclusion, the long term clinical outcome of patients with a
sustained response to interferon is favourable. Five year survival of
European sustained virological responders was similar to the general
population, matched for age and sex, and no HCCs were detected during
long term follow up.
STUDY METHODS
Study design
All European centres that had published long term data on patients
treated for chronic hepatitis C before 1997 were invited to participate
in the protocol and to include patients with response to treatment.
Additional entry criteria were study follow up longer than one year and
availability of HCV-RNA data. Nine centres met these criteria. Patients
from eight European hepatology units were included in the study.
Patient selection
Data from 343 consecutive chronic hepatitis C patients with response to
interferon monotherapy were obtained. All patients had participated in
protocolled studies (clear cohort or randomised controlled trial). Data
were collected on separate case record forms, one per patient, by the
local investigator. The case record forms were sent to the coordination
centre in Rotterdam where data were entered into a central database.
Before the data were entered, they were checked and, in case of doubt,
contact was made with the local investigator.
Data recorded
Information was obtained on demographics (date of birth, sex) and on
details of treatment (initial dose, duration of treatment, and total
dose of interferon). Virological data (genotype, viraemia) and
biochemical data (platelet count, bilirubin, albumin, and transaminase
levels) were measured in certified laboratories of participating
hospitals and added to the case record form by the local investigator.
Centrally, results were corrected for local normal values. Results of
pre- and post-treatment liver biopsies were recorded using the HAI score
for activity and the Knodell score for fibrosis. All centres used
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods with a detection limit of 100
copies/ml, except for one centre where PCR with a detection limit of
1000 copies/ml was used before 1998. No late virological relapses were
reported from this centre after introduction of a test with a
sensitivity of 100 copies/ml.
Follow up data were recorded every six months and included alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) levels, HCV-RNA, and the occurrence of clinical
events (decompensation, HCC, death).
Patients were considered to have decompensation if they showed any of
the following symptoms: ascites, bleeding varices, jaundice, or hepatic
encephalopathy. Patients were classified as having developed cirrhosis
on the basis of ultrasound (nodular contour, diminished hepatopetal
flow, collaterals), serology (platelets <80000, albumin <35 g/l,
clotting factors<50%), or liver biopsy. Patients were considered to have
HCC if the {alpha} fetoprotein level was >400 and ultrasound confirmed a
focal lesion, or if biopsy proved so. Death was classified as liver
related or liver unrelated.
Sustained virological response was defined as no detectable HCV-RNA at
the end of treatment and after six months of follow up. Patients with
normal ALT levels at these time points, but with detectable HCV-RNA at
the end of treatment or six months thereafter, were referred to as
biochemical responders. Sustained virological responders were considered
to have a late virological relapse if HCV-RNA was detectable on any
occasion after six months of follow up, confirmed by either a second PCR
or elevation of ALT levels above the upper limit of normal.
Statistical analysis
To evaluate factors of influence on late virological relapse, univariate
and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. The
Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the five year late relapse rate
and to determine the rate of occurrence of clinical events during five
years of follow up. The number of expected deaths and the expected
survival probability were calculated based on sex and age ranked
mortality among the Dutch general population, which is similar to most
European countries. The standard mortality ratio was calculated by
dividing the observed number of deaths by the expected number of deaths.
We used multiple regression analysis to identify risk factors for
fibrosis progression.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (SPSS Inc,
Chicago, Illinois, USA). All analyses were performed by the
Meta-Analysis of Individual Data group in Rotterdam (BEH, SWS, BJV),
which is experienced in the conduct of such studies.
|
|
| |
| http://www.natap.org/ |
|
| |
Fatty Liver Accelerates
Fibrosis: diabetes, mitochondrial dyfunction, obesity associated
|
| |
| |
"Natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A
longitudinal study of repeat liver biopsies"
Hepatology
Volume 40, Issue 4, October 2004
Eduardo Fassio 1 *, Estela Álvarez 2, Nora Domínguez 1, Graciela
Landeira 1, Cristina Longo 1
1Hepatology Unit, Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Nacional Profesor
Alejandro Posadas, El Palomar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
2Pathology Service, Hospital Nacional Profesor Alejandro Posadas, El
Palomar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
"...Our study shows that 31.8% of 22 patients with NASH had a
progression of liver fibrosis over a median follow-up of 4.3 years.
These findings confirmed the progressive potential of NASH. However,
most of the patients (68.2%) had no fibrosis progression...
... A two-hit hypothesis has been proposed to explain the mechanisms of
liver damage in NASH... The first hit has been associated with insulin
resistance... in only a proportion of patients with insulin resistance
and NASH will an advanced liver disease develop, and other factors, or
hits (like oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and abnormal
cytokine production), should be present to produce severe cellular
injury or fibrosis...
... Among 12 variables studied at baseline, we found that the prevalence
of obesity and BMI were the only variables [associated with fibrosis]...
Presence of diabetes has been shown to be an independent predictor of
severe fibrosis in a retrospective study that analyzed a large number of
patients. Among our patients, four of seven (57%) from group P and 4 of
15 (27%) from group NP had diabetes...
... Some very recent, noncontrolled studies have shown that
insulin-sensitizing agents (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) can lead to
improvement in histological features in NASH patients after 48 weeks of
treatment. If these results were confirmed in larger, controlled
studies, this kind of therapy would be accepted as being able to modify
the natural evolution of NASH and would be recommended promptly for
clinical practice..."
ABSTRACT/SUMMARY
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis may cause severe fibrosis, cirrhosis, and
hepatocellular carcinoma, but supporting evidence is based on indirect
data. Few publications have examined the results of repeat liver
biopsies to evaluate progression of fibrosis.
The aims of this study were to assess rate of fibrosis progression in
untreated patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and to identify
associated variables.
Among 106 patients, a second liver biopsy was proposed to those who had
undergone their first liver biopsy at least 3 years before. None of them
had been given pharmacological therapy. Liver biopsy samples were
evaluated blindly. Variables were compared between patients with (group
P) and without (group NP) fibrosis progression, using a Wilcoxon
rank-sum test for numerical variables and a difference of two binomial
proportions for categorical ones.
Twenty-two patients (median age, 45 years; age range, 20-69 years; 13
women; diabetes in 8 patients, obesity in 10 patients) underwent a
second liver biopsy 4.3 years (range, 3.0-14.3 years) after the first.
Fibrosis progression was found in 7 patients in group P (31.8%), no
progression was found in 15 patients in group NP. There were no
differences between both groups regarding age, gender, diabetes,
hyperlipidemia, ALT levels, AST-to-ALT ratio levels, albumin levels,
prothrombin activity, steatosis, or inflammation.
Obesity was significantly more prevalent in group P (86%) than in group
NP (27%; P = .01). Basal body mass index was higher in group P (median,
33.2; range, 29.1-38.2) than in group NP (median, 29.0; range,
24.0-38.1; P = .024). Time between biopsies was not different between
groups.
In conclusion, progression of liver fibrosis was found in a third of
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients 4.3 years after the first liver
biopsy, and obesity and body mass index were the only associated factors
with such progression.
Article Text
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is probably the main cause of chronic
liver disease in the West. The histological spectrum of nonalcoholic
fatty liver disease includes simple steatosis (type 1), steatosis plus
lobular inflammation (type 2), steatosis plus ballooning degeneration
(type 3), and steatosis plus ballooning degeneration plus Mallory bodies
or fibrosis (type 4). This classification is clinically important.
Whereas simple steatosis seems to be a benign and nonprogressive
condition, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) that includes the types 3
and 4 of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is recognized as a potentially
progressive disease that may cause cirrhosis and liver-related death.
However, our knowledge of the natural history of NASH is still very
limited and is largely based on indirect evidence. Cross-sectional
series have shown that 30% to 40% of patients have advanced liver
fibrosis at the time of presentation, whereas 10% to 15% of them may
have established cirrhosis. Three studies have found that patients with
cryptogenic cirrhosis have a greater rate of diabetes, obesity, or both
than those with cirrhosis resulting from other causes, suggesting that
cryptogenic cirrhosis may represent burned out NASH. In patients who
underwent liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis, steatosis,
and NASH have been shown in the graft during follow-up. Finally, the
appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma has been reported in NASH
patients, and in two large series of patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma evaluated retrospectively, it has been found that cryptogenic
cirrhosis (with the clinical phenotype of NASH) was the underlying liver
disease in 7% to 13% of the cohort.
Therefore, indirect data suggest that NASH may cause the entire spectrum
of complications of chronic liver disease: progressive fibrosis,
cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
However, longitudinal studies showing what percentage of patients with
NASH will have a progressive course are lacking. To our knowledge, the
published results of repeat liver biopsies come from only 56 patients
without cirrhosis but with NASH (included in six different studies). The
second biopsies were performed 1.2 to 15.7 years after the first and
showed fibrosis progression in 39.3% of patients. The first four studies
were clinical series examining NASH in which only a minority of patients
underwent a repeat biopsy, whereas the last two studies were specially
designed to evaluate histological changes. Furthermore, none of the
previous studies addressed whether basal variables could differentiate
patients with and without progression. These previous results are very
interesting, but the number of patients studied is still very limited,
and further prospective studies should be conducted to expand the
knowledge of the natural history of NASH.
Thus, the aims of this prospective, longitudinal study were to assess
the progression rate of liver fibrosis in nontreated NASH patients and
to identify clinical, biochemical, and histological variables associated
with fibrosis progression.
AUTHOR DISCUSSION
Our study shows that 31.8% of 22 patients with NASH had a progression of
liver fibrosis over a median follow-up of 4.3 years. These findings
confirmed the progressive potential of NASH. However, most of the
patients (68.2%) had no fibrosis progression. The different evolution
can not be explained by a smaller time span between biopsies in the NP
group. These patients underwent their second liver biopsy at a median
time of 4.3 years after the first (range, 3.2-7.9 years), not
significantly different from those in the P group.
It is important to emphasize that both the pathogenesis and the natural
history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and NASH are still
incompletely understood, but they may be closely related. It has been
postulated that most of the patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease have a fatty liver alone, a smaller proportion has
steatohepatitis, and a percentage has advanced fibrosis. A two-hit
hypothesis has been proposed to explain the mechanisms of liver damage
in NASH. The first hit has been associated with insulin resistance,
which has been demonstrated in almost all NASH patients studied and
would cause the accumulation of excess fat in the hepatocytes. However,
in only a proportion of patients with insulin resistance and NASH will
an advanced liver disease develop, and other factors, or hits (like
oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and abnormal cytokine
production), should be present to produce severe cellular injury or
fibrosis.
Considering that only approximately one third of NASH patients will have
increasing liver fibrosis in the midterm, it would be useful to know the
factors associated with that evolution, and our study sought to identify
clinical, biochemical, and histological variables able to predict
progression. Among 12 variables studied at baseline, we found that the
prevalence of obesity and BMI were the only variables that were
significantly different between the groups (with 86% and 27% of patients
being obese in the groups P and NP, respectively). Interestingly, the
changes in BMI during the follow-up were not different between the
groups. In fact, the gradients (final vs. basal values) of BMI were very
close to 0 in both groups. Thus, among NASH patients, those with obesity
would be very prone to fibrosis progression. Furthermore, in this
subgroup of patients, the dietary recommendations seem to be
insufficient to prevent progression, and they should be included in
trials of experimental pharmacological therapy (or immediately treated
when a drug is accepted as being efficacious). Presence of diabetes has
been shown to be an independent predictor of severe fibrosis in a
retrospective study that analyzed a large number of patients. Among our
patients, four of seven (57%) from group P and 4 of 15 (27%) from group
NP had diabetes. The P value (.2267) was far from being significant, but
we can not exclude a type II error because of the small sample size of
patients having both NASH and diabetes.
All the patients were referred to the Nutrition Department and
encouraged to follow a low-calorie and low-fat diet. However, it is
known that it is difficult for these patients to adhere to dietary
therapy in the long term. During the follow-up, 27% of patients (6 of
22) achieved a 5% or more reduction in their body weight, and that
percentage was not different between groups P and NP. Thus, we believe
that it is unlikely that the dietary treatment could have played an
important role in modifying the evolution of our patients' courses, but
we can not exclude a mild beneficial effect. Among the four patients
showing a decrease in the final fibrosis score, only one had had that
kind of weight reduction.
Comparing our results with those of 59 patients without cirrhosis but
with NASH and repeat liver biopsies previously published in the
literature, we found in our study a lower rate of fibrosis progression
(32%) during a longer follow-up (median, 4.3 years; mean, 5.3 years)
than those observed in the first four studies that were clinical series
and included 30 patients. It is difficult to determine the reasons for
that difference, because the demographical or analytical data are not
fully available in the papers. However, among 24 patients whose clinical
data are known, 22 (91.7%) were obese (the only predictor of
progression, according to our results), and this could be the main
explanation for a faster progression. The last two studies, like ours,
were designed to analyze changes in histological findings, and Harrison
et al. reported results impressively similar: 7 of their 22 patients
showed fibrosis progression in a mean time of 5.7 years between
biopsies. The clinical data of their patients also were similar to ours,
but the obesity prevalence was slightly higher (77%).
Other findings of our study worth noting are as follows. First, the
inflammatory activity in the basal liver biopsy was not different
between patients with or without fibrosis progression, in contrast to
what was expected. However, it should be noted that the grade of
inflammation was mild in most of the patients (19 of 22). Second,
changes in grade of steatosis run an independent course from those in
fibrosis, being found in the final liver biopsy a decrease in steatosis
and an increase in fibrosis, either in the entire population or in group
P patients. This observation is consistent with the suggestion that NASH
patients may lose the fatty infiltration when they reach the stage of
cirrhosis, which becomes a cryptogenic cirrhosis. Third, the evolution
of ALT values was not different between both groups and, especially in
group P, a normalization of ALT values was observed in six of seven
patients. It is important to emphasize that a normalization of ALT
levels does not guarantee fibrosis stabilization or improvement, because
many pilot studies evaluating pharmacological treatments in NASH have
claimed different drugs to be efficacious based only on the decreasing
ALT values.
The rate of progression of liver fibrosis has not been studied
previously in NASH. Considering the entire population, the rate of liver
fibrosis progression was estimated in 0.059 units of fibrosis per year.
In a recent study, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, Ghany et al.
found progression of liver fibrosis in 39% over a mean interval of 44
months (range, 2-211 mo) between both biopsies. The rate of liver
fibrosis progression was estimated in 0.12 fibrosis units per year.
Thus, our figure of fibrosis progression in NASH patients is
approximately half of that found in hepatitis C patients. However, in
patients from group P, the rate of progression was estimated to be 0.280
units of fibrosis per year.
Some very recent, noncontrolled studies have shown that
insulin-sensitizing agents (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) can lead to
improvement in histological features in NASH patients after 48 weeks of
treatment. If these results were confirmed in larger, controlled
studies, this kind of therapy would be accepted as being able to modify
the natural evolution of NASH and would be recommended promptly for
clinical practice. In that eventuality, studies like ours, aimed at
understanding natural history, no longer would be carried out because
they would be considered unethical, and the knowledge of the natural
history of NASH would remain rather limited.
In summary, the results of this longitudinal study have shown
progression of liver fibrosis in approximately one third of patients
with NASH in a median follow-up of 4.3 years, the presence of obesity
being the only factor associated with the progression. Patients with
NASH who are obese should be included in controlled trials of
experimental pharmacological therapy or should be treated promptly when
some agreement exists regarding the efficacy of any drug in retarding
the progression of fibrosis.
Patients and Methods
From October 1986 through December 2002, 106 patients were diagnosed
with NASH in the Liver Unit at the Professor Alejandro Posadas Hospital.
The diagnosis of NASH was based on the following four criteria.
Persistently abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, aspartate
aminotransferase (AST) levels, or both was the first criterion. A daily
alcohol intake of less than 40 g in men and less than 20 g in women, as
confirmed by patient anamnesis and interview of close family members,
was the second criterion. These cutoff levels of ethanol intake were
chosen because they were the usual ones when we designed the study.
Surrogate biochemical markers of alcohol consumption were not used.
Appropriate exclusion of other causes of chronic liver disease, such as
hepatitis B and C, autoimmune hepatitis, drug-induced hepatitis, primary
biliary cirrhosis, hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, was the third
criterion. The fourth criterion was characteristic features in the liver
biopsy, including macrovesicular steatosis (>10% of hepatocytes) and
lobular inflammation plus ballooning degeneration, Mallory hyaline
fibrosis, sinusoidal fibrosis, or a combination thereof. Patients
demonstrating only steatosis and lobular inflammation in their biopsy
results were not considered to have NASH. Either ballooning degeneration
or sinusoidal fibrosis had to be present to confirm the diagnosis of
NASH. This population included 55 males and 51 females with a median age
of 45 years (range, 17-78 years).
Patients were considered to have diabetes mellitus either if they were
receiving insulin or oral hypoglycemic treatment or if a fasting plasma
glucose test result was 126 mg/dL or more, according to the American
Diabetes Association definition. Hyperlipidemia was diagnosed when
fasting levels of cholesterol were more than 200 mg/dL, fasting levels
of triglycerides were more than 200 mg/dL in two occasions, or both.
Obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of more than 30, both in
men and women. BMI was calculated using the following formula: kg(weight)/m2(height).
Waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio measurements were not obtained
in these patients.
All the patients were referred to the Nutrition Department for the
treatment of their metabolic disorders (hyperlipidemia, obesity, glucose
intolerance, or diabetes), but no experimental pharmacological treatment
for NASH (e.g. ursodeoxycholic acid, vitamin E, glitazones) was given to
any patient. No patient was taking drugs associated with secondary NASH,
such as corticosteroids, perhexiline, tamoxifen, and amiodarone.
All the patients were scheduled to undergo a repeat liver biopsy at
least 3 years after the previous biopsy. Patients lost to follow-up were
contacted by phone calls or conventional mailing. The study protocol
conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki
and was approved by the ethics and research committees of our hospital.
Informed consent was obtained from each enrolled patient.
Liver biopsy samples were obtained by the percutaneous route using the
Menghini method. One or two passes were performed to assure samples at
least 25 mm in length. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver sections
were stained routinely with hematoxylin and eosin, silver reticulin,
Masson trichrome, Perls' Prussian blue, and diastase-resistant periodic
acid-Schiff.
After determining patient inclusion, all the liver biopsy specimens
(basal and final samples) were reexamined in a blind and nonpaired
manner by an experienced pathologist (E.A.) who was unaware of the
clinical and biochemical data of the patients or the order of the
biopsies. Studies on the liver specimens included a semiquantitative
assessment of the grades of steatosis (mild or grade 1, >10% but <33% of
hepatocytes affected; moderate or grade 2, 33%-66% of hepatocytes
affected; severe or grade 3, >66% of hepatocytes affected); of
inflammatory activity (according to Brunt classification); and of
fibrosis (according to Brunt classification and to Ishak
classification). Brunt classification of fibrosis assessment includes
five stages: stage 0, no fibrosis; stage 1, zone 3 perisinusoidal or
pericellular fibrosis, focally or extensively present; stage 2, zone 3
perisinusoidal or pericellular fibrosis with focal or extensive
periportal fibrosis; stage 3, zone 3 perisinusoidal or pericellular
fibrosis and portal fibrosis with focal or extensive bridging fibrosis;
stage 4, cirrhosis. Ishak classification ranges from zero to six stages:
stage 0, no fibrosis; stage 1, fibrous expansion of some portal areas,
with or without short fibrous septa; stage 2, fibrous expansion of most
portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa; stage 3, fibrous
expansion of most portal areas with occasional portal to portal
bridging; stage 4, fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked
bridging (portal to portal) as well as portal to central; stage 5,
marked bridging with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis); stage 6,
cirrhosis, probable or definite.
Progression of liver fibrosis was defined as an increase 1 grade or more
in the final stage with respect to the basal biopsy, in any of the two
classifications. Although Brunt classification was designed especially
for NASH patients, we decided to analyze changes in fibrosis according
to Ishak classification as well, because of its greater flexibility in
evaluating septal fibrosis (score 3 for occasional bridging, score 4 for
marked bridging), incomplete cirrhosis (score 5), and definite cirrhosis
(score 6).
http://www.natap.org/ |
September 29, 2004
Interferon and cirrhosis tied to liver failure in HIV/HCV
coinfection
By

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - In patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis
C virus (HCV), and who are also affected by cirrhosis, treatment with
interferon (IFN) raises the risk of hepatic decompensation, according to
German researchers.
However, this does not necessarily mean that interferon-based therapy
should be avoided, Dr. Stefan Mauss and colleagues write in the September
3rd issue of AIDS. Instead, "coinfected patients with histological
progression of their chronic hepatitis C should be considered for
interferon-based treatment before they develop late stage liver disease."
Dr |