|
Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C: Increased
Sustained Virological Response with High-dose RBV and Epoetin
By Marina Nunez, MD
Anemia
is the most important side effect of
ribavirin
(RBV), leading often to dose reductions and premature
treatment discontinuations. RBV dose reductions also are associated with
decreased SVR.
The use of
epoetin
(EPO) [Procrit] has been
proven to reduce anemia and the need for RBV dose reductions. Study results
presented at the 56th AASLD by Shiffman
and colleagues show that the use of EPO also increases
sustained
virological response (SVR) when
given with high doses of RBV to patients infected with HCV genotype 1.
Naïve patients infected with HCV-1 were
randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups:
Group 1:
pegylated
interferon (pegIFN)-a-2b
(1.5 mg/Kg/week) + RBV
13.3 mg/Kg/day (N=48)
Group 2:
pegylated interferon (pegIFN)-a-2b
(1.5 mg/Kg/week) + RBV 13.3 mg/Kg/day +
EPO (N=49)
Group 3:
pegylated interferon (pegIFN)-a-2b
(1.5 mg/Kg/week) and RBV 15.2 mg/Kg/day
+EPO (N=49)
In groups 2 and 3, EPO was given at onset of
treatment if hemoglobin values were < 15 g/dL,
or later on as soon as hemoglobin levels dropped below that threshold. EPO
dose was initially 40,000 U/week, and doses were increased to 60,000 U/week
if no response was obtained.
Groups were similar in age (median 48 years),
proportion of
African Americans (36-43%) and body weight (median 82.4 Kg).
Only a minority of patients had cirrhosis, and although without
statistically significant differences, it was more common in group 2 (8%)
than in groups 1 (4%) and 3 (2%).
The table summarizes the results of the study:
| |
Group 1
RBV 13.3/kg |
Group 2
RBV 13.3/kg+EPO |
Group 3
RBV 15.2/kg+EPO |
|
EVR |
67% |
53% |
65% |
|
ETR |
48% |
46% |
55% |
|
SVR |
27% |
24% |
45%* |
|
Relapses** |
36% |
40% |
8%* |
|
% RBV dose reduction
D/C anemia
Hb
<10g/dL
Hb
<8.5 g/dL |
40%
4%
34%
2% |
10%***
2%
9%
2% |
31%
0%
6%
0% |
* p<0.05 vs. groups 1 and 2
** % of responders at the end of treatment
*** p<0.05 vs. group 1
D/C: discontinuations
No significant differences were found in
early
virological
response (EVR) or
end-of-treatment response (ETR), but there were less
relapses and higher proportion of SVR in the high RBV dose
group compared to the others. SVR were higher in the high RBV dose group
than in the other groups regardless of race ( African-American,
31% vs. 18%; non-African American, 53% vs. 30%).
In summary, the use of EPO significantly
decreased the frequency of anemia, and the need for RBV dose reductions and
premature discontinuations.
The use of higher doses of RBV (1,000-1,600
mg/day) decreased relapses and therefore increased SVR across all body
weights and races in patients infected with HCV genotype 1.
These results are encouraging and suggest that
the use of high doses of RBV should be evaluated in large clinical trials.
11/23/05
Reference
M L
Shiffman and others.
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C viris (HCV)
genotype 1 with peginterferon alfa-2b (PEGIFN),
high weight based dose ribavirin (RVN) and
epoetin alfa (EPO)
enhances sustained virologic response (SVR).
Abstract 55. 56th annual
meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (56th
AASLD). November 11-15, 2005.
San Francisco,
CA.
http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/aasld/docs/112305_a.html
NATAP
http://natap.org/
Double-Dose
Peginterferon Alfa-2b with weight-Based Ribavirin Improves Response
for Interferon/Ribavirin Non-Responders with Hepatitis C: Final
Results of RENEW Study
Reported by Jules
Levin
Of note SVR rates were 12% for patients receiving stadard dose
Pegintron 1.5 ug/kg (+RBV) vs 17% for patients receiving 3.0 mcg/kg
double dose. But of note SVR rates were improved when hard-to-treat
patients (African-Americans [16% vs 4%] & stage 3-4) received double
dose. The improved results were more prominent for African-Americans
but there appeared to also be improvement for patients with advanced
stage disease. Patients with stage 3-4 had 12% SVR with double dose
compared to 8% for patients who received standard dose of 1.5
mcg/kg.
At AASLD Nov 2005 interim 12 week REPEAT Study results were
reported. The REPEAT Study provides retreatment with Pegasys/RBV for
patients who did not respond previously to peginterferon alfa-2b (Pegintron)
plus ribavirin therapy. Rates of early response at 12 weeks in
REPEAT (>2 log drop) were: 45% with standard Pegasys+RBV, and 62%
with induction dosing of double dose Pegasys for 12 weeks plus
ribavirin. You can see the full report on the NATAP website in the
AASLD reports section.
REPEAT Study reports:
http://www.natap.org/2005/AASLD/aasld_36.htm
http://www.natap.org/2005/AASLD/aasld_56.htm
The RENEW Study final results were reported by John Gross (Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, MN), but this study looked at nonresponders to
standard interferon plus ribavirin, not nonresponders to
peginterferon plus ribavirin (RBV).
Gross provided this background. Three large trials showed viral
response (SVR) rates of 10-12% when retreating with peginterferon
plus RBV for interferon/RBV nonresponders.. In one study the SVR
rate among African-American nonresponders was less than 6%. In the
RENEW Study Gross reports African-Americans achieved a 16% SVR rate
using double-dose Pegintron plus ribavirin. The RENEW Study also
reports the safety and tolerability of the double-dose
Pegintron.RENEW was conducted at 100 academic and community centers
in the USA was investigator initiatied. The study included only IFN/RBV
nonresponders & they were retreated with Pegintron + RBV.
Nonresponders study patients were randomized to Pegintron 3.0 ug/kg
plus RBV 800-1400 mg/day or one of two lower Pegintron doses (0.5 ug/kg
or 1.5 ug/kg, but the 0.5 group was discontinued). After 24 weeks
treatment was continued if HCV RNA was negative.
Patients had compensated liver disease. Doses were reduced 33% in
RENEW for toxicity. Growth factors were not used. Sample size:
detect 12% vs 19% with 80% power. Intent-To-Treat analysis, assuming
missing data as non-response.
963 patients were enrolled. 137 patients to 0.5 ug/kg, enrollment
was stopped for this dose group. 411 patients enrolled in 1.5 ug/kg
group & 352 started study. 415 patients enrolled in 3.0 ug/kg group
& 352 started therapy.
Average age was 48 yrs in both groups (1.5 & 3.0 ug/kg). weight was
87 kg in 1.5 group & 89 kg in 3.0 group (ns). 29-30% in both groups
were female. 39% in 1.5 group & 41% in 3.0 group had stage 3-4
fibrosis (ns), quite a high rate of advanced disease. 91-92% of
patients had genotype 1. 16% in both dose groups were
African-American.
RESULTS
Viral
Response Rates
End Of Treatment: 24% of patients were HCV negative in both dose
groups at the end of treatment.
SVR: 17% in the 3.0 dose group achieved SVR vs 12% in the 1.5
dose group (p=0.03).
Of note, responses were stratified by baseline disease stage and
body weight, and of course for African-Americans. Patients with
early disease (stage 0-2) achieved 17% SVR compared to 10% SVR for
patients with advanced HCV disease (stage 3-4). Patients with body
weight <85 kg achieved a 12% SVR compared to patients with body
weight >85 kg who achieved 17% SVR, go figure. Caucasians had a 15%
SVR rate compared to 10% for African-Americans.
Results among Patients With Inherently Low Response Rates
Of particular note was the improved response rates for these
traditionally hard to treat patient groups when using the 3.0
double-dose compared to 1.5 lower dose. African-Americans achieved
16% SVR rate when using 3.0 double dose compared to only 4% when
using the 1.5 dose. Patients with advanced disease (stage 3-4) also
improved response rates when using 3.0 double dose: 12% SVR rate vs
8% for patients who received the 1.5 lower dose.
Results According to Body Weight
>65 kg: 13% SVR
65-85 kg: 15% SVR
85-105 kg: 16% SVR
>105 kg: 20% SVR
Adverse Events
1.5mcg/kg 3.0mcg/kg
Fatigue 75% 76%
Headache 40% 39%
Irritability/depression 45% 51%
Myalgia/arthralgia 34% 37%
Nausea 32% 34%
In a graph of the White Cell Counts, the two doses did not appear to
show much difference, both groups appeared to show comparable
reductions in WBC while on therapy, and a return to normal after
stopping therapy.
Dose Reduction
First 12 weeks: 25% dose reduced on 1.5 dose compared to 33%
taking 3.0 dose
Overall: 37% dose reduced on 1.5 dose compared to 45% on 3.0 dose.
Discontinuation
Discontinuation due to adverse event was 11% in 1.5 dose group &
13% in 3.0 dose group. Overall discontinuation rates were 35% in 1.5
group & 36% in 3.0 group.
Conclusions by Authors
Among non-responders to interferon/ribavirin, peginterferon
alfa-2b 3.0 mcg/kg weekly is more effective than 1.5 mcg/kg weekly
combined with 800-1200 mg/day. The safety and tolerability of
peginterferon alfa-2b 3.0 mcg/kg weekly and 1.5 mcg/kg weekly are
similar.
Comment by Gross
High-dose peginterferon/ribavirin treatment deserves further
study as initial therapy for patients with inherently low response
rates.
|
|
Short-term Treatment Duration for HCV Genotypes 2 and 3 Patients
It is well known that
HCV genotypes 2 and 3 patients have significantly higher
sustained
response rates (SVR) to treatment compared to
genotypes 1 and 4 patients. Prior studies have also
demonstrated that 12-14 weeks treatment is effective in genotype 2 or 3 HCV
patients who become HCV
undetectable after 4 weeks of therapy
rapid
virologic response (RVR) or “Super
Responders (SR)”.
In this retrospective study, 2
data sets of patients from Italy and Norway were pooled with the objective
of identifying predictors of sustained virological response (SVR), RVR and
relapse after short term treatment (12-14 weeks or 24 weeks)
with peginterferon alfa-2b (PegIntron) (1.0, n=281 or 1.5 μg/kg, n=122) plus
ribavirin (800-1200 mg). Dosing depended on negative or positive HCV RNA at
week 4.
The primary endpoint was
undetectable HCV-RNA 24 weeks after therapy (SVR).
Results
SVR was
obtained in 313/403 patients (78%).
SVR
differed between cases with or without RVR (85% vs 62%), mild or bridging
fibrosis/cirrhosis (82% vs 67%), absent/mild or moderate/severe steatosis
(84% vs 72%), HCV-2 or -3 (81% vs 73%) low or high viremia (80% vs 67%).
RVR, mild
fibrosis, and HCV-2 were independent predictors of SVR.
RVR was
obtained in 274/403 (68%) patients, 163/242 (67%) HCV2, and 111/161 (69%)
HCV-3.
Patients
with RVR had, as compared to those without RVR, more frequently low grade
steatosis (72% vs 64%), mild fibrosis (70% vs 63%, and high PegIFN dose (78%
vs 64%).
RVR was
independent of viral load.
absence of
severe fibrosis independently predicted RVR.
In RVR
patients, SVR was achieved in 85% of both HCV-2 and HCV-3.
Virologic
relapse was observed in 29/274 RVR patients (10.6%), and was more frequently
observed among those with low ALT levels (14% vs 5%), high viremia (14% vs
6%), and severe fibrosis (18% vs 8%).
Peg-IFN
dose,
steatosis and genotype were not associated with risk of
relapse.
Severe
fibrosis and low
ALT
were independent predictors of relapse.
In conclusion, the authors write,
“In HCV-2 or -3, the HCV RNA status after 4 weeks of therapy may guide
treatment duration. Short treatment duration is effective in both HCV-2 and
-3 patients with RVR, but those with severe fibrosis are less likely to
experience both RVR and SVR, and more frequently relapse off therapy.”
11/18/05
Reference
A Andriulli and others. SHORT-TERM TREATMENT DURATION FOR HCV-2
AND HCV-3 INFECTED PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS. Abstract 1234.
Abstracts of the annual meeting of the
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (56th AASLD).
November 11-15, 2005. San Francisco, CA.
|