This Web Site is committed to the memory of Janis Morrow.
2005 Research
Back to Index of Research Articles
|
Fibrosis Evaluation: Comparison of FibroScan with Liver
Biopsy, Fibrotest, Fornscore, Apri, Hyaluronan, Prothrombin Time, and
AST/ALT Ratio Transient elastography (FibroScan®, Echosens, France) is a new non-invasive rapid and reproducible method allowing evaluation of liver fibrosis by measurement of liver stiffness. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate, in patients with chronic liver disease, the accuracy of FibroScan®, Fibrotest®, Forns score, APRI, hyaluronan, AST/ALT ratio, and prothrombin time (PT) compared to liver biopsy, for the diagnosis of fibrosis. 363 consecutive patients (216 males, mean age 51 years) with chronic liver disease (HCV (n=190) or HBV infection (n=13), alcoholic liver disease (n=43), others (n=117) were included. Results Fibrosis score according to Metavir split as follow: F0-F1 n=114, F2 n=101, F3 n=52, F4 n=96. Liver stiffness ranged from 2.7 to 75 kPa. For a positive predictive value > 90%, cut-off values of FibroScan® were 8.6 kPa for F≥2, 13 kPa for F≥3 and 17.6 kPa for F=4. The AUROCs (95% CI) are shown in the table. The best performances were obtained by combining Fibroscan® with Fibrotest® or Forns with AUROCs of 0.80 and 0.81 for F≥2, 0.89 and 0.84 for F≥3, 0.94 and 0.95 for F=F4, respectively. When FibroScan® and Fibrotest® agreed, the concordance with liver biopsy was 76% for F≥2, 93% for F≥3, and 98% for F=4. The authors conclude, “In chronic liver diseases, FibroScan® is an efficient, non-invasive method for the diagnosis of fibrosis. Its performance is of the same order as that of serological markers of fibrosis.” “Combining FibroScan® and Fibrotest® or Fornscore in the assessment of fibrosis could avoid liver biopsy in the majority of patients with chronic liver disease.”
http://hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/050205_hcv_c.html
Screening for Fibrosis with Non-invasive Biomarkers (Fibrotest)
in Hyperlipidemic Patients The aim of the cureent study was to use FibroTest, validated in chronic hepatitis C1, B2, alcoholic3 and non-alcoholic steatosis4, to identify HP with F2F3F4. A consecutive cohort of HP, HCV-HBVneg, <50g alcohol/day, followed in a lipid center was analyzed. Fibrotest was retrospectively performed on frozen fasting sera (–80 C); a control group of blood donors was prospectively included. Fibrotest was performed blinded with security algorithms to identify high-risk of false negative/positive. Results Among 1,542 subjects, 40 (2.59%) were excluded using security algorithms, and 1,502 included: 50.3% female, median age 49yrs, 957 HP and 545 controls. Among HP, 83.4% had cholesterol >=200mg/dl, 93.6% LDL-C >=100mg/dl, 17.5% triglycerides >=200mg/dl, 35.9% BMI >=27, 33% arterial hypertension, 31.8% insulinemia >=10mUI/ml and 13.7% glucose >=6mmol/L. GGT or ALT were elevated (>=50 IU/L) in 215 HP (22.5%).
Conclusions Based on these results, the authors conclude, “Screening strategies for liver fibrosis are feasible with biomarkers in high-risk groups such as HP.” “Without such non-invasive strategies a liver biopsy would have been indicated in up to 22.5% of HP with elevated GGT or ALT and would have probably missed half of HP with fibrosis, who had normal GGT and ALT.” Biopredictive Department, Metabolism Unit, Biochemistry Department, Transfusion Unit, and Hepato-Gastroenterology Department,GHPS, Paris, France. 05/02/05
Reference http://hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/050205_hcv_d.html
Are Current Fibrosis Serum Markers an Adequate Alternative
to Liver Biopsy? French researchers recently described a score of fibrosis combining PIIINP and MMP-1, which are involved in fibrogenesis and fibrolysis, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy compared to that of a panel of other markers including prothrombin time (PT), hyaluronate (HA), Fibrotest (FT), APRI and Forns’ score in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients One hundred and eighty CHC patients seen in our centre for a pre-therapeutic liver biopsy were prospectively included. Liver fibrosis was assessed using the METAVIR index. Sinusoidal fibrosis, steatosis and iron load were quantified. Biochemical measurements were performed on serums collected the day of the biopsy. Results Median length of liver biopsies was 22 mm. Patients were classified as F0:n=15, F1:n=74, F2:n=40, F3:n=26, F4:n=24.
Conclusion The authors conclude, “Our results confirm that PIIINP/MMP-1 provides relevant information on liver fibrosis with a good accuracy, comparable to that observed with FT, APRI and Forns’ score.” “However, none of these scores can reliably give an estimated METAVIR index in each patient. Combination of several scores could improve their accuracy. “ Département D'hépato-Gastroentérologie, Département D'anatomie-Pathologie et Histologie, Laboratoire D'enzymologie, and Laboratoire de Biochimie, DBI, Grenoble, France. 05/02/05
Reference http://hivandhepatitis.com/2005icr/easl/docs/050205_hcv_e.html
MONITORING LIVER ELASTICITY: A NEW TOOL TO MEASURE LIVER FIBROSIS DURING THERAPYB. Coco, F. Oliveri, P. Colombatto, P. Ciccorossi, R. Sacco, F. Bonino, M.R. Brunetto
Introduction Hepatic fibrosis is the major indicator of progressive liver disease. However histology, the gold standard for fibrosis, requires an invasive procedure, that is unsuitable for monitoring disease progression and may be affected by sampling errors.
Aim Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of liver elasticity by Fibroscan (a device equipped with a vibrator and an ultrasound system; Echosens, Paris, France) for detection of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in a cohort of patients with viral (HBV and HCV) chronic hepatitis.
Patients We measured liver elasticity in 178 consecutive patients: 105 had liver biopsy showing chronic hepatitis with or without cirrhosis and 56 had compensated (Child A) cirrhosis. Histological grading and staging were scored according to Ishak classification. Liver elasticity measurement were reproducible and operator-indipendent. Seventeen patients were excluded from the analysis (liver biopsy not suitable for staging in 8 and technical limitation to Fibroscan in 9).
Results Stiffness values at the Fibroscan significantly correlated with fibrosis scores (Table n1). Liver elasticity value higher than 14 KPa (cut-off defined by ROC analysis) identified patients with cirrhosis with 72,6% sensitivity and 93,5% specificity (DA 82,6%). Among cirrhotic patients those with IFN/antiviral induced biochemical remission (23 of 60) had significantly lower elasticity mean values (13,2 vs 24,3 KPa, p<0,001). In the group of patients with persistent disease activity Fibroscan showed a better AD (88,2%), with 83,9% sensitivity, 92,9% specificity.
Conclusion Liver elasticity measured by Fibroscan correlates with fibrosis at histology significantly and lower stiffness values in patients with biochemical remission prompt its clinical usefulness to monitor treatment efficacy. http://www.hcvadvocate.org/news/reports/EASL_2005/April%2015a.htm#a15a_1
|
|
People with liver fibrosis can see an improvement in their
disease after taking
interferon-alfa, says a new study from
Greece, but those who achieve a
sustained virological response (SVR) have
the best outcomes.1
Still, even non-responders and those who relapse can see a benefit from the medication, depending on the length of time that they take it, according to doctors in the Academic Department of Medicine at Hippokration Hospital of Athens, Greece. Clarifying the Mystery Fibrosis is scarring of the liver that occurs in hepatitis infection. It can potentially progress to cirrhosis, a type of chronic liver disease in which normal cells are damaged and replaced by scar tissue. Cirrhosis ranks as the eighth leading cause of death in the United States.2 "The possible effect of interferon-alfa on liver fibrosis progression has not been adequately studied in chronic hepatitis B,” wrote George Papatheodoridis, MD, and his colleagues. Comparing Treated with Untreated
Patients One hundred twenty patients had previously been treated with interferon alfa, and the remaining 27 had not. Each patient had undergone at least 2 biopsies previously, as well. Papatheodoridis and his colleagues found fibrosis improved in about 17 percent of the treated patients, overall, compared to just 4 percent of those who didn't receive therapy. Those who achieved sustained virological responses had the most improvement in liver fibrosis compared to relapsers, who had the worst improvement. Even Relapsers and Nonresponders
Benefited Fibrosis also worsened in about a third of those treated—the worst progression mostly in nonresponders. But that compares to some 70 percent of those who didn't undergo interferon therapy at all, the researchers found. "The annual rate of fibrosis progression was worse in the untreated than in treated patients," Papatheodoridis and his colleagues wrote, a significant finding, even considering nonresponders and relapsers. The research team also discovered that several key factors increased the likelihood of fibrosis progression: older age, and worse liver disease or lower fibrosis level at the beginning of this study. Interferon Benefits Found in All
Cases "Sustained off-therapy response should remain the measure of interferon efficacy," Papatheodoridis told Priority Healthcare. "However, we showed that, although sustained off-therapy response is the optimal outcome and results in significant improvement of fibrosis, the worsening of liver fibrosis is slower in patients without such a response (relapsers or non-responders) compared with untreated cases." Though the benefit for non-responders and relapsers may be temporary, other antiviral agents could be subsequently prescribed, Papatheodoridis explained. 'First Therapeutic Option' "We will continue further studies in more detailed aspects of this area," Papatheodoridis said. "I think that our study further strengthens the suggestions that interferon should be the first therapeutic option for patients with HBV E antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B." 1. Papatheodoridis GV, Petraki K, Cholongitas E, Kanta
E, Ketikoglou I, Manesis EK. J Viral Hepat 2005
Mar;12(2):199-206. John Martin is a long-time health journalist and an editor for Priority Healthcare. His credits include coverage of health news for the website of Fox Television's The Health Network, and articles for the New York Post and other consumer and trade publications. http://www.hepatitisneighborhood.com/content/in_the_news/archive_2283.aspx
Relationship Between Serum Ferritin, Hepatic Iron
Staining, Diabetes Mellitus and Fibrosis Progression in Patients with
Chronic Hepatitis
C
Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus affects over 170 million individuals worldwide and 20% of patients develop cirrhosis after 20 years. Increased iron stores and hepatic iron content have been suggested as important contributors to fibrosis progression. As well, the increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been associated with increased iron deposits in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of the current study was to assess the potential relationship between serum ferritin and hepatic iron staining and liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and whether these factors are increased in diabetic patients with hepatitis C virus. This was a cross-sectional, multi-centre study involving hospitals in the north-east of London between 1992 and 2003. Chronic hepatitis C patients with a liver biopsy and data concerning age, sex, basal metabolic index, diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance, alcohol intake, serum ferritin level and ethnicity were enrolled. Each biopsy was scored for fibrosis and stained for hepatic iron. Three hundred and thirty nine patients (200 Caucasian; 139 Asian) were enrolled. Fifty three patients had no fibrosis, 131 had mild fibrosis (stage one to two Modified Ishak), 68 moderate fibrosis (stage three to four) and 87 cirrhosis (stage five to six). Findings
Conclusions The authors conclude, “Many patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection may have elevated serum ferritin and/or iron deposition within the liver. However, neither played a significant role in the progression of hepatitis C virus-related liver injury.” “The association between chronic hepatitis C virus infection and type II diabetes mellitus exists, however the biological mechanism of this association still remains to be elucidated.” Hepatobiliary Group, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Science, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK. 03/09/05
Reference
Predicting Progressive Fibrosis Stage by Baseline and
Subsequent Liver Biopsy
Results of retrospective suggest that 20% of individuals with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection become cirrhotic within 20 years. Known risk factors for advanced hepatic fibrosis include age at time of infection, male sex, excess alcohol consumption, and cytokine polymorphisms. This prospective study aimed to evaluate and identify factors predictive of change in hepatic fibrosis stage in chronic HCV infection by interval protocol liver biopsy. One hundred and five patients with paired liver biopsy specimens separated by a mean 41 months were recruited from a cohort of 823 HCV carriers. Results Five per cent of participants developed worsening hepatic fibrosis by more than two stages. In 43% there was no change in fibrosis stage. Excessive alcohol intake currently or previously predicted progression. In contrast, always having a normal alanine transaminase and always being negative in serum for HCV RNA predicted no progression. Three models were developed to predict outcome. Progressive fibrosis was predicted by baseline fibrosis, steatosis and age. The rate of progressive fibrosis was predicted by baseline fibrosis, steatosis and lobular inflammation. Fibrosis stage on the second biopsy was predicted by baseline fibrosis alone. The rate of progression varies widely. Alcohol misuse is an important co-factor. Progressive fibrosis can be predicted at first liver biopsy, where baseline fibrosis is most critical, allowing targeted therapy for those with early disease and a significant risk of progression. 02/18/05
Reference
Impact of Steatosis on the Progression of Fibrosis in
Patients with Mild Hepatitis
In patients with mild hepatitis C, the usefulness of antiviral therapy is a subject of debate, as a low risk for progression of fibrosis is assumed. Several studies have shown that steatosis (fatty liver) is a strong and independent predictor of the severity as well as the progression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. The present study assessed the impact of steatosis on the progression of fibrosis between paired liver biopsies in untreated patients with mild hepatitis on index biopsy. One hundred thirty-five untreated patients (mean age, 38 years; M/F sex ratio, 1.43) with one known risk factor of infection (68 transfusions, 67 injecting drug use) had 2 liver biopsies after a median interval of 61 months (18-158). All had METAVIR score of A1F1 or lower at first liver biopsy. Unequivocal progression of fibrosis was considered if patients had a fibrosis score of 3 or 4 at the second liver biopsy. The probability of progression of fibrosis was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. During follow-up, progression of fibrosis occurred in 21 patients (16%) after a median delay of 65 months. Cumulative probabilities of the progression of fibrosis at 4 and 6 years were 5.2% and 19.8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, steatosis was the only independent factor predictive of progression of fibrosis. Probability of progression of fibrosis was significantly related to the percentage of hepatocytes with steatosis. The authors conclude, “Steatosis is a major determinant of the progression of fibrosis in mild hepatitis C, regardless of the genotype. Our results argue for antiviral treatment in the subgroup of patients with mild hepatitis and steatosis.” 01/05/05
Reference http://www.hivandhepatitis.com/hep_c/news/2005/010505_b.html
|
|||||||
If you're female, you may be protected against the risk of
fibrosis progression in hepatitis C better than men. So say medical
researchers in France who analyzed the gender differences in fibrosis
development in over 200 women.1
Estrogen May be Prophylactic Doctors have hypothesized in previous scientific studies that estrogens may exert an antifibrotic effect in some way. "Recent data strongly suggest that estrogens and/or estrogen receptors have an impact on the course of liver disease," wrote Di Martino and the study investigators. But the effect that estrogens play on liver fibrosis risk hasn't been studied extensively, they added. Survey Questions Distributed When patient characteristics were analyzed, the investigators learned that the average age of the women when they underwent liver biopsy was 48, 60 percent had a history of blood transfusion, and nearly a fifth of the women had been prior IV drug users. Almost two-thirds of the survey respondents were infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C, the most common and the most difficult to treat of all the hepatitis genotypes.2 In evaluating the women's exposures to estrogen, they reported their age at first menstrual period, on average, was 13 and there was an average of nearly 30 years of fertility before they underwent liver biopsy indicating hepatitis infection. In addition, nearly two-thirds had had at least one pregnancy prior to their hepatitis diagnosis. Another 61 percent reported they were menopausal when their hepatitis infection was confirmed. The investigators found that 67 percent of the women were taking oral contraceptives before liver biopsy, one-fifth of whom were on the pill at the time of biopsy. When the researchers looked at HRT use, more than half of the women in the survey said they had been prescribed the therapy previously, and a large majority in that group had been taking HRT at the time their hepatitis infection was confirmed. Estrogen Exposure and Fibrosis
Risk Fibrosis was less advanced, on average, in women who had previously used oral contraceptives, as well. However, oral contraceptive use had no impact on the rate of fibrosis development, they reported. This could be due, they theorized, to insufficient levels of estradiol in the medication, which wouldn't have increased estrogen levels to a point at which they might have provided the protection. "Our study of the events of reproductive life and estrogen therapy provides consistent evidence that estrogens may have a protective effect on the long-term course of chronic hepatitis C in females," write Di Martino and his colleagues. Researchers: Our Results Are
'Intriguing' The findings are "intriguing" they wrote, but quickly adding that the results "should be considered hypothesis-generating and in need of confirmation." Of particular interest is the link between fibrosis development and HRT use in postmenopausal women, they wrote. "The menopausal state was independently associated with accelerated fibrosis progression," a finding that has valuable implications for physicians treating women with HCV who've reached menopause. Doctors are often reluctant to prescribe HRT for these women, they pointed out, because of the drugs' potential toxicity to the liver in those cases. "Our findings suggest that this treatment—or at least the combination of transdermal estrogen and oral progesterone—is safe and potentially beneficial with respect to liver fibrosis." The Estrogen/Liver Cancer Link In their study of nearly 1,000 women, doctors at National Taiwan University found that women who had a history of more pregnancies faced a significantly lower risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma compared to those females who had had fewer pregnancies. They also learned that those who were older at menopause tended to have a lower risk of liver cancer compared to those who entered menopause earlier. "Use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, and there was a trend in the risk with increasing duration of HRT," they wrote. Based on these findings, the Taiwanese physicians suspected that greater exposure to estrogen may be protective against liver cancer. Similarly, some of the same doctors at Pitie-Salpetriere hospital in Paris published a study earlier that same year that examined the factors that increased or slowed the rate of fibrosis development in nearly 5,000 people with varying types of liver diseases. Among other factors, they found that being female tended to slow the development of fibrosis, though they didn't examine the possible causes. By contrast, the investigators also noted that this was not the case in alcoholic liver disease. Women with that disease tended to develop fibrosis faster, they wrote. 1. Di Martino V, Lebray P, Myers RP et al. Progression
of liver fibrosis in women infected with hepatitis C; long-term benefit of
estrogen exposure. Hepatology 2004 Dec;40(6):1426-33. |
|||||||