| |
Treatment for Decompensated Cirrhotics
Individuals with decompensated cirrhosis need treatment urgently, as
their five-year survival is 50% (Fattovich 1997). The safety of
interferon and ribavirin in decompensated cirrhotics is a
significant concern. Individuals with decompensated cirrhosis are at
greater risk of life-threatening complications during therapy, such
as deteriorating liver function, bone marrow suppression, and
infections. Because of these concerns, individuals with
decompensated cirrhosis have been excluded from pivotal clinical
trials. Data on treatment of decompensated cirrhotics are very
limited; there have been no randomized, controlled treatment trials
in this population.
Everson and colleagues studied safety, efficacy, and tolerability
of a gradually accelerated dosing regimen. This strategy resulted in
SVR among 22% (20/91), with 40% (8/20) of those who achieved SVR
remaining HCV-RNA-undetectable after liver transplantation. The
regimen started with low doses of interferon (1.5 MIU thrice
weekly), plus ribavirin (600 mg/day). Doses of each drug were
gradually increased every two weeks, as tolerated. Growth factors
were used to maintain blood cell counts when needed (Everson 2000).
Information on changes in hepatic function, Child-Pugh scoring after
treatment (see
Chapter IV, Diagnostics), and serious adverse events was
not available.
Crippin and colleagues conducted a pilot study of the safety,
tolerability and efficacy of interferon with or without ribavirin in
individuals with decompensated cirrhosis. Fifteen participants
awaiting liver transplantation were randomized to:
- Interferon alfa-2b, 1 MIU/day;
- Interferon alfa-2b, 3 MIU/thrice weekly; or
- Interferon alfa-2b, 1 MIU/day, plus ribavirin 800 mg/day.
At the end of treatment, 33% had undetectable HCV RNA, and 55%
had reduced viral loads. During the study, two individuals had liver
transplants; both had recurrent hepatitis C. Adverse events were
frequent and serious; 20 of the 23 adverse events were serious
(severe thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, hepatic encephalopathy,
and serious infections). One person died from infectious
complications (Crippin 2003). The study was ended because of the
frequency of severe adverse events.
Garcia-Retortillo and colleagues treated 30 individuals (13
cirrhotics and 17 with hepatocellular carcinoma) awaiting liver
transplantation. Treatment was initiated when the anticipated
interval before transplantation was less than five months and
continued until transplantation. At the time of transplantation,
9/30 had undetectable HCV-RNA levels and 6/9 remained undetectable
after transplantation (median follow-up of 26 weeks; range: 5-60
weeks).
The original regimen was standard interferon alfa-2b (3 MIU
daily) plus ribavirin (400 mg every 12 hours). The dose of
interferon was reduced in 60% (18/30); the ribavirin dose was
reduced in 20% (6/30). Growth factors were given when necessary (G-CSF
to 10/30; epoetin-alfa to 8/30). Treatment was discontinued
permanently by four individuals and temporarily by two. There were
three serious adverse events: two cases of sepsis and one case of
hepatitis. Leukopenia was reported in 18/30, thrombocytopenia in
13/30, and anemia in 5/30 (Garcia-Retortillo 2002b).
http://www.aidsinfonyc.org/tag/coinf/hcv2004/chap5b.html |
|
|
| |
Treatment for Compensated Cirrhotics
Cirrhotics may remain stable for several years. During this window,
initiation of HCV treatment may delay progression to hepatic
decompensation or hepatocellular carcinoma. In a retrospective
follow-up of 384 compensated cirrhotics with hepatitis C, the
five-year survival probability was 91%, decreasing to 79% at ten
years, suggesting that this interval presents a valuable opportunity
for HCV treatment (Fattovich 1997).
A retrospective analysis of data from 637 cirrhotics, treated and
untreated, found that treatment with interferon—regardless of the
outcome—seems to affect the oncogenic mechanisms of HCV. Interferon
alfa is active against a number of cancers, including
AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). The International
Interferon-a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Study Group identified
predictors of progression from compensated cirrhosis to
hepatocellular carcinoma (male sex, older age, and signs of portal
hypertension) and time from diagnosis of cirrhosis to development of
hepatocellular carcinoma. The study compared outcomes of two matched
groups, one of 356 untreated cirrhotics and one of 281 cirrhotics
treated with interferon. The median duration of therapy was 7 months
(range: 3-30 months). Participants were followed for at least three
years. The overall risk of progression to HCC was 1.99 for untreated
individuals (95% CI, 1.09-3.6; P=0.027), with 66 untreated
individuals and 29 treated individuals developing HCC during an
interval of 36-250 months. Among cirrhotics with HCV infection, the
relative risk of progression to hepatocellular carcinoma among
untreated individuals was 3.14 times that of those treated with
interferon (95% CI, 1.46-6.80; P=0.004). In a subgroup of cirrhotics
who were HCV-antibody-positive and anti-HBV-negative, the risk of
progression to hepatocellular carcinoma for untreated individuals
was 6.28 times greater (95% CI, 1.65-23.97; P<0.007) (The
International Interferon-a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Study Group
1998).
The effect of interferon on the clinical outcomes of 189
cirrhotics was retrospectively assessed by Benvegnů and colleagues
during a mean follow-up of 71.5 ± 23.6 months; 7.9% of those who
received treatment (88/189) and 21.8% of untreated individuals
(101/189) had progressive liver disease (by Child's staging; see
Chapter IV, Diagnostics).
Hepatocellular carcinoma developed in 5.6% of treated persons vs.
26% of untreated individuals (P<0.001) (Benvegnů 1998).
Imazeki and colleagues retrospectively analyzed the effect of
interferon on survival rates of people with hepatitis C. Of the 459
individuals in this study, 104 were untreated. Among cirrhotics,
those who achieved SVR had a reduced rate of mortality during the
eight-year follow-up. Hepatocellular carcinoma accounted for 25
deaths overall; only one was a sustained virological responder (Imazeki
2003).
There are particular safety concerns for cirrhotics; many are
more vulnerable to side effects and adverse events, especially the
hematologic toxicities of pegylated interferons. As a result, dose
reductions may be more frequent, and the efficacy of treatment may
be diminished. For example, there were dose reductions among 83%
(44/53) of those participating in an ongoing study of the viral
kinetics of pegylated interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin in
cirrhotics (Gane 2002).
Interim data from an HCV treatment trial in people with advanced
liver disease (bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis) suggests that
full-dose pegylated interferon and weight-based dosing of ribavirin,
especially in non-1 genotypes, may increase the likelihood of
sustained virological responses. Participants were randomized to
receive 48 weeks of treatment with either full-dose (1.5 µg/kg once
weekly) or half-dose (0.75 µg/kg once weekly) pegylated interferon
alfa-2b, plus 800 mg/day of ribavirin. Sustained virological
response data are available from 165 of 210 participants who have
completed follow-up (Abergel 2003). No information on adverse
events, dose reductions, or discontinuations was provided.
Table 25. Sustained Virological Response by
Regimen and Genotype
A subset of individuals with bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis have
participated in large HCV treatment trials. The treatment regimens
and study populations differ, so it is difficult to draw conclusions
from pooled data.
Table 26. Sustained Virological Response Rate
Among Persons With Bridging Fibrosis and Cirrhosis: Subgroup Data
From Four Trials
The goals of therapy may be different for those with advanced
liver disease. Averting liver transplantation, slowing disease
progression, and improvement in liver histology may be relevant
outcomes in the absence of achieving SVR, although histological
response often correlates with virological response. Without
long-term follow-up, it is impossible to know if histological
improvement and/or viral eradication translate into increased
quality of life and survival. Long-term studies of interferon
maintenance therapy for non-responders with advanced liver disease
are underway.
http://www.aidsinfonyc.org/tag/coinf/hcv2004/chap5b.html |
|
|
| |
Treatment for Relapsers and Non-Responders
As HCV treatments become more effective, options for
re-treatment of relapsers and non- responders have increased. The
likelihood of achieving an SVR after re-treatment of HCV hinges in
part upon the difference in efficacy of the first regimen and any
subsequent regimen. Using the identical treatment regimen usually
does not improve treatment outcomes; the re-treatment regimen should
have superior efficacy to the initial regimen.
Prognostic factors—genotype, baseline HCV RNA—and ability to
tolerate HCV treatment influence the likelihood of successful
re-treatment. The type of response to the initial course of
treatment may also contribute to the success of re-treatment.
Relapsers (who become HCV RNA undetectable but do not remain
aviremic after completion of treatment) are more likely to achieve
an SVR after re-treatment than non-responders (Shiffman 2002a).
There are two patterns of non-response to HCV therapy. A partial
response indicates a decrease in HCV RNA of >2.0 log and
persistently detectable HCV RNA during treatment; a flat response is
characterized by a decrease of <2.0 log in HCV RNA while on
treatment, which may be an indication of interferon resistance.
Strategies for effective re-treatment have included higher-dose
interferon monotherapy, different types of interferon, a longer
duration of therapy and re-treatment with a combination of
interferon plus ribavirin or pegylated interferon plus ribavirin.
Data from two meta-analyses of re-treatment for non-responders to
interferon monotherapy report low overall SVR rates (ranging from
13% to 20%). Individuals were re-treated with inteferon plus
ribavirin. Reponse rates depended on duration of re-treatment
therapy and individual prognostic factors (Cheng 2001; Cummings
2001).
Pegylated
Interferon in Relapsers and Non-Responders
End-of-treatment results are available from a study examining
responses to re-treatment with 48 weeks of pegylated interferon
alfa-2a plus ribavirin in 64 individuals who relapsed after 24 weeks
of treatment with the same regimen. The maximum allowable dose for
pegylated interferon was 180 µg once weekly; the maximum dose for
ribavirin was 1,000-1,200 mg/day. Some individuals received lower
doses of one or both drugs based on their experience with each drug
during the previous regimen. End-of-treatment results are available
from 59 participants who completed 48 weeks of treatment (Goncales
2002). Since all participants achieved undetectable HCV RNA after
their initial course of treatment (with the exception of one person,
who was withdrawn from this study) the efficacy of re-treatment with
the same regimen for a longer interval can be determined only at
week 72.
Table 24. HCV-RNA Levels at Week 48 of
Re-treatment
HALT-C:
Treatment in Non-Responders with Advanced Liver Disease
The Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment Trial Against
Cirrhosis (HALT-C) is assessing tolerability and rate of SVR in
individuals with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (Ishak score 3 by
liver biopsy; see
Chapter IV, Diagnostics) who were
non-responders to prior therapy with standard interferon, with or
without ribavirin. During the lead-in phase of HALT-C, all
participants received 24 weeks of pegylated interferon alfa-2a 180
µg once weekly plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg/day, based on weight).
Individuals with detectable HCV RNA after 20 weeks of treatment were
rolled into HALT-C. Those with undetectable HCV RNA at week 20 were
treated for an additional 28 weeks, then followed for 24 more weeks.
So far, SVR data is available from 604/863 who have completed
treatment and follow-up. Overall, 18% (109/604) achieved SVR. Prior
interferon monotherapy, genotype 2 or 3, a lower AST:ALT ratio and
no cirrhosis were associated with achievment of a sustained
virological response. SVR was more likely among those who received
≥60% of the ribavirin dose (21% vs. 11%; P=0.05) (Shiffman 2004).
In a sub-group of 212 HALT-C participants who completed therapy
by late 2002, the likelihood of SVR was significantly greater in
non-African Americans, non-1 genotypes, those with a 2.0 log
decrease in HCV RNA at week 12, and persons less than 50 years old
(P<0.005 for all). More than half of these the participants had dose
reductions of pegylated interferon and/or ribavirin. Week 24
discontinuations for fatigue, depression, or hematologic
abnormalities were reported in 5% (Shiffman 2002b).
http://www.aidsinfonyc.org/tag/coinf/hcv2004/chap5b.html |
|
|
| |
| Persistent
ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low
MELD scores who are at high risk for early death. Hepatology.
2004;40:802. |
|
Hyponatremia and Persistent Ascites Predict Pretransplant Mortality in
Cirrhotic Patients With Low MELD Scores |
| |
| Posting Date: October 22, 2004 |
- Prospective, observational, internally
validated study
|
| Summary of Key Conclusions |
- Low serum sodium (< 135 mEq/L) and
persistent ascites independently predict mortality in cirrhotic
liver disease patients awaiting transplant
- Better prediction of pretransplant
survival possible by factoring hyponatremia and persistent ascites
into Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score
- Particularly for patients with low
MELD scores under current categorization
|
| Background |
- Pretransplant mortality common in
cirrhotic liver transplant candidates despite low initial MELD
scores
- Rapid increase in MELD score more
predictive of death than absolute score
- This study examined predictors for
risk of rapid deterioration
- Markers for advanced-stage cirrhotic
hemodynamic derangement evaluated
|
| Summary of Study Design |
- MELD scores determined from orthotopic
liver transplant application data collected on cirrhotic patients
- 507 patients from US Veterans
Administration Health System between 1997 and July 2003
- Training group: 296 patients
analyzed before February 2002
- Validation group: 211 patients
- Exclusion criteria:
- Fulminant hepatic failure
- Prior transplant
- Insufficient data for MELD and
Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores
- Significant drug or alcohol use
- Study endpoint: outcome (death or
transplant date)
- Data collected
- Demographics
- Liver disease etiology
- Presence of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Clinical complications: ascites,
encephalopathy, hemorrhage
- Laboratory data: blood counts, liver
enzymes, clotting factors, serum sodium, creatinine
|
| Baseline Characteristics |
- Demographics
- Mean age, 52 years (range, 28-74)
- 98% male
- Contributors to liver disease etiology
- Hepatitis C (68%)
- Alcohol use (67%)
- Hepatitis B (4%)
- Cholestatic liver disease (2.4%)
- Complications at referral
- Ascites and/or hydrothorax (38%)
- Severe encephalopathy (15%)
- Stage of cirrhosis (CTP score)
- 49% class C (most severe)
- 40% class B
- 11% class A
- MELD scores
- ˇÜ10 (16%)
- 11-18 (59%)
- 19-24 (15%)
- ˇÝ25 (11%)
|
| Main Findings |
- MELD score < 21 in 48% of
pretransplant patients who died within 180 days of referral
- Independent predictors of mortality
(multivariate analysis)
- MELD score (P < .001)
- Low serum sodium (< 135 mEq/L) (P
= .003)
- Persistent ascites (P = .004)
- MELD score as a predictor of mortality
- MELD score only predictor in
patients with MELD > 21
- MELD score not predictive in
patients with MELD < 21
- Predictors for mortality in training
group (multivariate analysis; binary logistic analysis):
| MELD score |
.014 |
NS |
| Serum sodium < 135
mEq/L |
NS |
.001 |
| Persistent ascites |
NS |
.011 |
NS = not significant
- Sodium and mortality rates at 180 days
- Low serum sodium (33.3% mortality)
- Normal serum sodium (5.8% mortality)
- Persistent ascites and mortality rates
at 180 days
- Persistent ascites (25.7% mortality)
- No persistent ascites (5.8%
mortality)
- Pretransplant mortality better
predicted by factoring hyponatremia and persistent ascites into
MELD score (designated MELD-AS: MELD-ascites-sodium)
- Add 4.46 points for persistent
ascites
- Add 4.53 points for low serum sodium
(< 135 mEq/L)
- Comparison of MELD and MELD-AS scoring
systems as predictors of 180-day mortality in training group:
| MELD |
.687 + .102 |
NA |
| MELD-AS |
.790 + .146 |
< .05 |
SEM = standard error of the mean
|
| Other Outcomes |
- Predictive mortality value of
hyponatremia and persistent ascites in patients with low MELD
scores confirmed in validation group
- Hyponatremia (P = .002)
- Persistent ascites (P < .001)
|
| References |
Heuman DM, Abou-assi SG, Habib A, et al. Persistent
ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and
low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death. Hepatology.
2004;40:802-810.
|
http://clinicaloptions.com/hep/jopt/articles/article.asp?a=Heuman-Hepatol-2004-10&page=capsule |
|
| |
DGDispatch
AASLD:Late-Evening
Snacks Containing Branched-Chain Amino Acids Benefit
Hepatitis-Caused Cirrhosis
By Maria Bishop
BOSTON, MA -- November 8, 2004 -- Long-term consumption of a
late-evening
snack that is rich in branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) may help
improve
cirrhosis caused by hepatitis virus -- including reducing muscle
cramps and
stopping progression of the cirrhosis.
These findings were presented on November 1st by Japanese
researchers here
at the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Liver
Diseases.
Recent studies have shown that protein-energy malnutrition has a
great
impact on both quality of life and survival in a cirrhotic patient.
Yoshitaka Fukuzawa, MD, PhD, professor, Division of
Gastroenterology, School
of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagoya, led a prospective
study on
the effects in outpatients with cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C. The
subjects were 70% male, and the average age was 60 years old.
Subjects with poor nutrition (90%) were identified and grouped using
the
Maastricht Index, and were then prescribed a late-evening snack
product with
6.1 g BCAAs and 13.7 g of protein (Aminoleban® EN (Otsuka
Pharmaceutical
Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The product was given in divided doses, 1
hour
before bedtime for 3 months. The researchers conducted a statistical
comparison of classic dietetic, immunological and biochemical
parameters, as
well as Short Form 36 quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) scales
before
and after treatment.
Patients who took the late-evening snacks had a significant increase
in each
parameter, which resulted in a significant decrease in Maastricht
Index
score (P <.001) 3 months after treatment compared to the
pre-treatment
baseline. In addition, arm circumference and arm-muscle
circumference
increased significantly (P <.001) in these patients, while the
triceps
skin-fold thickness decreased significantly (P <.001). For the
non-poor-nutrition group, changes in the various parameters were not
significant during the treatment period.
Virtually no adverse reactions were noted in the treated group.
Muscle
cramps were reported by 20% of patients before treatment and by 10%
at the
3-month mark. Three parameters improved significantly (P <.05) in
the
quality-of-life assessment based on SF-36 -- role functioning
(physical),
vitality, and mental health.
The researchers found the nutritional assessment based on the
Maastricht
Index to be convenient and useful for screening patients with poor
nutrition, allowing them to conduct appropriate nutritional
assessments at
an early stage of cirrhosis.
Aminoleban® EN is marketed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,
Tokyo, Japan.
[Study title: "Nutrition Assessment and Management in Outpatients
With Liver
Cirrhosis Caused by HCV (LC-C) - Usefulness of a Branched Chain
Amino Acid
(BCAA)-Rich Product As Late-Evening Snacks (LES)." Abstract 798]
http://archive.mail-list.com/hbv_research/msg07458.html
|
|
|