other HCV Information

HISTORY OF HCV

GLOSSARY/ABBREVIATIONS

LIVER FUNCTIONS

QUESTIONS ABOUT HCV

EXTRAHEPATIC CONDITIONS

SYMPTOMS

TRANSMISSION

SEXUAL TRANSMISSION

HCV BLOOD TESTS/LABS

LABS ON TREATMENT

BIOPSY RESULTS

ALTERNATIVE TO BIOPSY

STILL NEED A BIOPSY ?

ON BIOPSY WHAT DOES THE STAGE MEAN AND WHAT DOES THE GRADE ME ?

STAGES/LIVER DISEASE

FIBROSIS

CIRRHOSIS

TRANSPLANTS

LIVER CANCER

GENOTYPES

VIRAL LOAD

PEGASYS/ PEGINTRON

INFERGEN

HELP/SIDE EFFECTS

DRUG INTERACTIONS

NUTRITION  & HCV

TREATMENT STORIES

FIRST SHOT

INTERVIEWS

FIND A DOCTOR

FINANCIAL AID/MED ETC

SUPPORT GROUPS/TRANSPLANTS

HCV SUPPORT GROUPS

PICTURES Of OUR FRIENDS

INFORMATIONAL LINKS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This Web Site is committed to the memory of Janis Morrow.

Human liver   

Articles and Interviews

Back to Main Index of all our Interviews

HCV Genotype Testing Offers Cost-Effective Treatment Strategy
By Mike Snyder

Patients confronted with a diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, along with their families, often struggle to understand a confusing array of new medical terms. What exactly does "viral load" mean? What does ALT stand for, and why does it matter? What’s the difference between fibrosis and cirrhosis?

For doctors, explaining the significance of these technical terms to distraught patients can be quite a challenge. And as research advances the scientific community’s understanding of HCV, the list of terms that patients need to understand gets longer and longer.

Increasingly, the term "genotype" is making its way into these conversations. A physician’s counseling of an HCV-infected patient often includes a discussion of the various genotypes of the virus, and how the patient’s genotype might affect decisions about treatment. Essentially, these genotypes reflect variations in the genetic makeup of the virus.

A Valuable Tool

Today, many liver specialists agree that determining a patient’s genotype can be a valuable tool in deciding the duration of therapy — either 24 or 48 weeks — with the current treatment of choice, a combination of the drugs interferon and ribavirin. Beyond this, however, the medical significance of genotypes remains unclear.

In a study published this year in the journal "Seminars in Liver Disease," Patrizia Farci, M.D., and Robert H. Purcell, M.D., put it this way: "Although there is consensus that the HCV genotype may influence the outcome of antiviral therapy, no consensus has been reached on other important issues, such as the effects of genotype on transmission, infectivity, pathogenesis and natural history of the disease."

The growing body of research about HCV genotypes stems from the intense scientific interest in the virus, which has emerged as the most common chronic blood-borne infection in the world. HCV infects an estimated 4 million Americans and perhaps 170 million people worldwide. It is a major cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and liver cancer, and is the leading cause of liver transplants in the United States. At least 85 percent of those infected develop a chronic infection.

Six Genotypes Identified

Scientists have identified six major genotypes of HCV, along with more than 50 subtypes. In the United States, Europe and Japan, genotypes 1, 2 and 3 are predominant. Seventy-five to 80 percent of U.S. patients are infected with genotype 1, and most of the remaining U.S. patients have genotypes 2 or 3. Unfortunately, studies show that genotype 1, which afflicts the greatest number of people in the United States, also is more resistant to therapy than genotypes 2 or 3.

According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK), an agency of the National Institutes of Health, "Patients with genotype 2 or 3 are almost three times more likely to respond to therapy" than patients with genotype 1.

Several studies, moreover, have shown that patients with genotype 1 derive the greatest benefit from a 48-week course of treatment with interferon plus ribavirin. Patients with genotypes 2 or 3 usually do just as well with only 24 weeks of treatment.

A 1998 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine stated, "Among patients with . . . HCV genotypes (other than genotype 1) who were treated with combination therapy, the response rates did not vary significantly as a function of the duration of therapy."
Such findings have prompted many physicians to order genotype testing for HCV-infected patients to help determine the duration of therapy. The NIDDK specifically recommends that patients with genotype 1 receive 48 weeks of treatment while those with genotypes 2 or 3 receive 24 weeks. Because of the high costs and often-severe side effects of the drug regimen, doctors say it is foolish to continue the therapy longer than necessary to derive the maximum benefit.

Cost-Effective Approach

Emil Miskovsky, M.D., a liver specialist at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, says he routinely orders genotype testing for patients for whom therapy is being considered. "In individuals who are not interested at all in therapy or in whom therapy is not clearly indicated, genotyping may not have the same value," Miskovsky says.

The use of genotyping as a tool to guide the duration of therapy can help doctors choose the most cost-effective course of treatment, according to a 1999 study in the journal Hepatology. "The strategy using viral genotyping first and then adjusting the duration of combination therapy was the most cost-effective approach," the study states. The study compared the most accepted treatment strategies for chronic hepatitis C and considered viral eradication as the "most important endpoint." It analyzed the various alternatives based on cost, survival rates and quality of life indicators.

One of the study’s authors, Zobair M. Younossi, a liver specialist at INOVA Fairfax Hospital in Falls Church, Va., says research showing the value of genotyping in determining duration of therapy has provided considerable benefit to doctors and patients. But he cautions against making unwarranted assumptions about the meaning of the research findings. For example, he says, a patient infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 should not assume that because those genotypes are more responsive to therapy than genotype 1, they are less likely to cause serious liver disease."To say that the genotype has a role in the aggressiveness of the disease, that is less clear and may not actually be true," Dr. Younossi says.

Studies intended to determine the influence of the genotype on the severity of disease caused by an HCV infection have yielded contradictory results, Drs. Farci and Purcell say in their study. "Variations in patient characteristics at the time of enrollment (in studies), especially age, duration of the infection, histological stage of the disease, and (factors such as) alcohol consumption, make it difficult to compare the results reported in the literature," they write.

Determining a patient’s genotype requires laboratory analysis of a blood sample. The test is a molecular assay that may be done in conjunction with tests to determine the presence and level of virus in the patient’s blood. Costs of the tests vary, but typically range from $250 to $375, according to John Lawson of Innogenetics, a Georgia biotechnology firm that manufactures a genotyping assay. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved genotype testing, many insurance carriers cover the cost of the assay, Lawson says. He advises patients to check with their insurance carrier to determine if the tests are covered.

Physicians take a variety of approaches in explaining the significance of genotypes to HCV-infected patients. Dr. Miskovsky says, "I liken it to flavors of the virus, like ice cream, and explain that in the U.S. there are essentially 1, 2 and 3, but in the world there are 1 through 6. I tell them that it is relevant in terms of the length of therapy and that the test does not need to be done more than once." A patient’s genotype does not change during the course of the infection.

Future research could answer some of the many lingering questions about the medical significance of the various

 

 
    • Fibrosis in Patients with Hepatitis C: Detection and Significance
      Thierry Poynard, M.D., Ph.D., Vlad Ratziu, M.D., Yves Benmanov, M.D.,
      Vincent Di Martino, M.D., Pierre Bedossa, M.D. , Ph.D., and Pierre Opolon,
      M.D.
      Abstract
      Estimates of the extent of hepatic fibrosis and the rate of fibrosis
      progression represent important surrogate end points for evaluation of the
      vulnerability of an individual patient and for assessment of the impact of
      treatment on natural history in chronic hepatitis C.

      Using the median fibrosis progression rate, the median expected time to cirrhosis in
      untreated patients is around 30 years. However, one third of patients have
      an expected median time to cirrhosis of less than 20 years and one third
      will only progress to cirrhosis in more than 50 years, if ever.

      Factors independently associated with fibrosis progression are duration of
      infection, age, male gender, consumption of alcohol, human immunodeficiency
      virus co-infection, and low CD4 count. Evaluation of fibrosis progression
      is useful to decide treatment. Among patients with sustained viral
      response, fibrosis regresses. Evaluation of fibrosis progression has
      permitted validation of the concept of suppressive therapy. Among patients
      without viral clearance, interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin
      significantly reduces fibrosis progression rate in comparison with
      progression before treatment and to control groups. There is a major need
      for noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis. None are clearly useful today
      for the diagnosis of early stages of fibrosis. [Sem Liver Disease
      20(1):47-55,2000. ©© 2000 Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.]
      Introduction
      Worldwide, the major clinical consequence of chronic hepatitis C infection
      is the progression to cirrhosis and its potential complications:
      hemorrhage, hepatic insufficiency, and primary liver cancer. Cumulative
      evidence strongly suggests that the increase in mortality due to
      hepatocellular carcinoma in most Western countries is due to hepatitis C
      infection.
      Current understanding of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been
      advanced by the concept of liver fibrosis progression. Fibrosis is the
      deleterious but variable consequence of chronic inflammation. It is
      characterized by the deposition of extracellular matrix components, leading
      to the distortion of the hepatic architecture with impairment of liver
      microcirculation and liver cell function. HCV is usually only lethal when
      it leads to cirrhosis, the last stage of liver fibrosis. Therefore, an
      estimate of fibrosis progression represents an important surrogate end
      point for evaluation of the vulnerability of an individual patient and for
      assessment of the impact of treatment on natural history.
      For hepatologists, liver biopsy is considered to be an essential procedure for making rational decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis C. For
      patients and general practitioners, it can be considered as an aggressive
      procedure. The aim of this chapter is to review the different markers of
      liver fibrosis progression and to discuss the appropriateness of liver
      biopsy in comparison with other procedures in chronic hepatitis C.
      Fibrosis Stages and Necroinflammatory Activity Grades
      Activity (necroinflammation) and fibrosis are two major histologic features
      of chronic hepatitis C included in different proposed classifications.

      One of the few validated scoring systems is called the METAVIR scoring system.
      This system assesses histologic lesions in chronic hepatitis C using two
      separate scores, one for necroinflammatory grade (A for activity) and
      another for the stage of fibrosis (F). These scores are defined as follows;
      stages of fibrosis (F) (Fig. 1): F0, no fibrosis; F1, portal fibrosis
      without septa; F2, portal fibrosis with rare septa, F3, numerous septa
      without cirrhosis; F4, cirrhosis.

      Grade for activity (A): A0, no histologic necroinflammatory activity; A1, minimal activity, A2, moderate activity, A3, severe activity. The degree of activity was assessed by integration of the severity of the intensity of both piecemeal (periportal) necrosis and
      lobular necrosis as described in a simple algorithm. The intra- and
      interobserver variations of this METAVIR scoring system are lower than
      those of the widely used Knodell scoring system. For METAVIR fibrosis
      stages there is an almost perfect concordance (kappa = 0.80) among
      pathologists.

      Figures 1. The METAVIR Fibrosis staging system. F0 is normal liver (no
      fibrosis). F1 = portal fibrosis. F2 = few septa. F3 = many septa. F4 =
      cirrhosis. As did others, we observed that fibrosis stage and inflammatory grade were
      correlated. However, for 36% of patients, there was a discordance (178 of
      500). If recommendations for treatment had been based on activity grades,
      56% of patients without significant activity (119 of 214) would not have
      been treated despite significant fibrosis. In these patients who were
      infected for more than 10 years, fibrosis progression was therefore not
      related to significant activity, which also raises questions concerning the
      pathophysiology of fibrosis. The other discordant cases were 59 patients
      with nonsignificant fibrosis despite significant activity. This observation
      raises the question of the utility of treatment of significant inflammatory
      damages if fibrosis does not occur. To summarize, clinicians should not
      take "significant activity" as a surrogate marker of "severe disease."
      Fibrosis stage is the result of the imbalance between synthesis and
      degradation of extracellular matrix components. Hepatic stellate cells are
      the major cell types involved in extracellular matrix production (i.e.,
      collagens, fibronectin, and laminin). Although hepatic stellate cells
      produce extracellular matrix under the influence of various stimuli (growth factors, cytokines, and lipid peroxydation products), they also produce a
      set of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that control degradation. MMPs are
      a family of related zinc-dependent endopeptidases capable of degrading all
      extracellular matrix components, playing a major role in extracellular
      matrix remodeling. Finally, proteolytic activity of MMPs can be inhibited
      by the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases, a group of proteins also
      produced by hepatic stellate cells.
       
    • grade, which represents necrosis is not a good predictor of fibrosis progression. In fact, fibrosis
      alone is the best marker of ongoing fibrogenesis. So far there is no study
      demonstrating clearly that activity grades are predictive of fibrosis
      progression independently of fibrosis stage.
      Fibrosis as a Time-Dependent End Point
      Because fibrosis stage summarizes the vulnerability of a patient and is
      predictive of the progression to cirrhosis, we looked at its association
      with the duration of infection and age at biopsy. The basic concept was to
      estimate the transition times from infection to cirrhosis and between the
      different stages of fibrosis (Fig. 2). An ideal assessment would have been
      to follow a large representative sample of patients prospectively from
      infection to death, with repeated liver biopsies and without treatment.
      Obviously, this type of study is both ethically and pragmatically
      impossible. The rare published studies on several biopsies were
      retrospective and included few and selected patients. We described the
      natural history of liver fibrosis progression and relevant risk factors in
      a cross-sectional study of single liver biopsy in a large number of
      patients for whom a reliable estimate of fibrosis had been performed. The
      estimate was assessed primarily in patients for whom the duration of
      infection was known, but its validity had been checked by indirect
      estimates using age at biopsy and in two smaller longitudinal studies with
      repeated biopsies.

      Figures 2. The model of fibrosis progression from infection to complications.
      This study found a strong, almost linear, correlation of fibrosis stages
      with age at biopsy and duration of infection. This correlation was not
      observed between activity grades (Fig. 3). Therefore, fibrosis stages are
      more representative of disease progression in comparison with activity
      grades. Although hepatitis C is a viral disease, it is mainly a fibrotic
      disease. Mortality and complications are related to cirrhosis. The clinical
      hallmarks of major necrosis and inflammation (i.e., severe acute hepatitis
      and fulminant hepatitis) are very rare compared with hepatitis B. Even in
      immunologically compromised patients, there are very few acute flare ups in
      patients with chronic hepatitis C.

      Figure 3. Relationship between age at biopsy and stage of fibrosis (panel a), and grade of activity (panel b), and between estimated duration of
      infection and stage of fibrosis (panel c) and grade of activity (panel d).
      Dynamic View of Fibrosis Progression
      Because of the informative value of fibrosis stage, it is of interest for
      clinicians to assess the speed of the fibrosis progression. We observed
      that fibrosis progression rate was not normally distributed (median, 0.133
      METAVIR grade per year, lower than the mean 0.252) but rather, asymmetric.
      The distribution suggested the presence of at least three populations: one
      population of "rapid fibrosers," a population of "intermediate fibrosers,"
      and one population of "slow fibrosers." Therefore, the computation of a
      mean (or median) fibrosis progression rate per year and of a mean expected
      time to cirrhosis does not signify that the progression to cirrhosis is
      universal and inevitable. Using the median fibrosis progression rate, the
      median expected time to cirrhosis in untreated patients was 30 years; 33%
      of patients had an expected median time to cirrhosis of less than 20 years
      and 31% will progress to cirrhosis in more than 50 years, if ever (Fig. 4).

      Figure 4. Progression of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
      Different Estimates of Fibrosis Progression
      Limitations of any estimate of fibrosis include the difficulty in obtaining
      paired liver biopsies, the necessity for large numbers of patients to
      achieve statistical power, and the sample variability in fibrosis
      distribution. Even in published randomized trials, fewer than 50% of
      included patients undergo a second liver biopsy after the end of the
      treatment. Because the time elapsed between biopsies is relatively short
      (usually between 12 and 24 months), the number of events (transition from
      one stage to another) is rare. Therefore, the comparisons between fibrosis
      progression rates requires a large sample size to observe significant
      differences. The slope of progression is difficult to assess because there
      is no large database with several biopsies. Therefore, the real slope is
      currently unknown, and even if there is a linear relationship between
      stages and age at biopsy or duration of infection, other models are
      possible. Furthermore, liver biopsy has its own limitations in assessing
      liver fibrosis. Although it is the gold standard to score fibrosis, its
      value is limited by sample variability. At least a 10-mm-length biopsy is
      mandatory to assess fibrosis accurately.
      The assessment of fibrosis progression over time can be achieved by
      different methods. The observed (direct) fibrosis progression rate is
      defined as the ratio of the difference in fibrosis stages between two
      biopsies, expressed in METAVIR units, and the interval between the two
      biopsies in years. For example, for a patient with fibrosis stage 2 at the
      first biopsy and stage 3 at the second biopsy performed 2 years later, the
      fibrosis progression rate was 0.500 fibrosis units per year. The advantage
      of this assessment is that the exact duration is known. The limitations are
      that the interval between biopsies is rather short (mean, 20 months) compared with the mean time for transition between fibrosis stages (7
      years) and that there is a risk of sampling and interpretation errors for
      both biopsies.
      The estimated (indirect) fibrosis progression rate per year is defined as
      the ratio between the fibrosis stage in METAVIR units and the estimated
      duration of infection in years. In this model it is assumed that the
      patient has no liver fibrosis the day of infection (stage F0) and that the
      fibrosis progression rate is constant. For example, for a patient with
      fibrosis stage 2 and an 8-year duration of infection, the fibrosis
      progression rate was 0.250 fibrosis units per year. The advantages of this
      assessment are the longer duration (mean, 16 years) and the absence of
      variability at infection if the assumption of F0 is correct. The
      limitations are that the duration of infection may be unknown and, even
      when known, it remains an estimate (i.e., it is assumed that the first
      transfusion or the first intravenous drug injection was the true date of
      infection). It is also possible that some patients already have a degree of
      fibrosis (i.e., due to alcohol) on the day of infection.
      Nonquantitative assessment of fibrosis progression can be obtained more
      simply by the percentage of patients who worsen, improve or do not change
      their stage between two biopsies. The advantage of this assessment is
      simplicity. The disadvantage is that it does not take into account the
      observation period and the lack of discriminant power over short durations
      between biopsies. If these percentages (transition probability from stage
      to stage) are used in Markov modelling, they have to be expressed by time
      units. This Markov transition modelling has been used to reconstruct HCV
      epidemics in France (8). This modelling was possible only because age and
      sex influences on fibrosis progression have been taken into account. The
      transition rates from normal liver at infection to the different stages can
      also be estimated by time dependent modelling as actuarial curves.
      Factors Associated withFibrosis Progression
      Several factors clearly have been shown to be associated with fibrosis
      progression rate duration of infection, age, male gender, consumption of
      alcohol, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection, and low CD4
      count. The progression from infection to cirrhosis depends strongly on sex
      and age. Viral factors such as genotype, viral load at the time of the
      biopsy, and quasispecies are not correlated with fibrosis.
      Appropriateness of Liver Biopsy
      In chronic liver disease, several studies have evaluated the intra- and
      interobserver (pathologist) concordance, the discordances among methods,
      and the sampling errors. For chronic viral liver disease, there were
      significant concordances for standardized items, particularly for fibrosis
      staging.
      Four randomized trials have compared different biopsy methods. For the
      diagnosis of cirrhosis, one trial observed better sensitivity with
      laparoscopy versus percutaneous biopsy and another trial better sensitivity using the Tru-Cut versus the Menghini needle. One trial reported larger
      sampling by ultrasound-guided anterior large-bore cutting needle biopsy
      than with the intercostal Menghini technique, and less adverse events. One
      trial observed fewer adverse events when ultrasound-guided biopsy was used
      (2 vs. 9%), whatever the needle used.
      It is only very recent that the histologic standards defining a normal
      liver have been revisited. No scoring systems have so far integrated a
      definition of normal liver in their own definitions.
      Adverse Events and Mortality of Liver Biopsy
      A summary of the published articles (with more than 200 patients) assessing
      severe adverse events and mortality rates is given in Table 1. There was
      significant heterogeneity among the observed mortality rates, with a range
      from 0 to 3.3/1,000. Risk factors identified were age and cirrhosis.
      Indication of Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Hepatitis C Chronic Hepatitis C
      Recent consensus conferences have stated that liver biopsy is mandatory in
      chronic hepatitis C with abnormal alanine aminotransferase permitting
      grading and staging of the disease. It is stated that liver biopsy should
      be performed before initiating treatment and that it is not known if and
      when repeat biopsy is necessary.
      In chronic hepatitis C, liver biopsy is probably not mandatory in patients
      who need treatment whatever the results of the biopsy, for example in
      patients who can contaminate other people or in patients who have
      extrahepatic manifestations impairing the quality of life. Liver biopsy
      assesses the rate of disease progression when the date of contamination is
      known (fibrosis progression rate) and improves the prediction of treatment
      response.

 

 

Hepatitis C Is Not Life-Threatening for Most Infected People in US

By Linda Bren

Following is an overview of HCV infection published by the US FDA, with an emphasis on diagnosis and vaccination, the decision to treat or not to treat, current treatments, treatment success, and side effects from therapy.

It's often portrayed as a virus causing an incurable disease--a killer with few outward warning signs that lurks inside the body and slowly ravages the liver. For some, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is deadly, but for most of the nearly 4 million Americans infected with the virus, it is not life-threatening.

"Some cases are mild," says Leonard Seeff, MD, a hepatologist at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), "and people can go through their whole lives and never have a problem. For others who develop severe liver disease, it is a terribly serious problem."

HCV is responsible for 8,000 to 10,000 deaths per year in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The virus is spread mainly through contact with the blood of an infected person. Most people don't know they carry the virus because they have either no symptoms or vague ones--extreme tiredness is the most common. Other common symptoms are "flu-like": muscle and joint pain, nausea, poor appetite, and mild stomach pain.

Only about 15 percent of those infected with HCV have a short-term infection that goes away by itself and never returns. The other 85 percent become chronically infected, meaning the virus stays in the liver, replicates, and may slowly attack the organ over a period of decades.

Despite many years of chronic infection, the majority of people infected with HCV do not develop severe liver disease, and some may not need treatment, says William Schwieterman, MD, chief of the immunology and infectious diseases branch in the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Most studies report that cirrhosis (advanced liver scarring) develops in 10 percent to 20 percent of people with chronic HCV infection over a period of 20 to 30 years. Liver cancer develops in 1 percent to 5 percent.

Those who do need treatment have more and better therapies today than were available just a few years ago. Although treatments come with the risk of serious side effects, many individuals with HCV infection are benefiting from them.

Disease in Decline
The number of new cases is going down precipitously," says Jay Hoofnagle, M.D., director of the division of digestive diseases and nutrition at the NIDDK. During the 1980s, an average of 230,000 new infections occurred each year in the United States, according to CDC estimates. But between 1989 and 1996, the annual number of new infections declined by more than 80 percent, to 36,000 reported cases.

This decrease is explained by the introduction of routine blood screening for HCV antibodies in 1991 and improved testing for the virus in 992--lowering significantly the risk of transmitting the virus through blood transfusions.

Individuals who have the virus and are otherwise healthy may be at less risk for severe liver damage than previously thought. Several studies led by Seeff have shown that serious illness and death from liver disease in people infected with HCV is by no means inevitable.

In a study published in the Jan. 18, 2000, issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, Seeff examined the records of more than 8,000 US military recruits. Seventeen who had tested positive for HCV 45 years earlier had similar hospital admission rates over the 45-year period as those who were HCV-negative. After 45 years, only two of the 17 (11.8 percent) showed evidence of liver disease; one of these died from liver disease 42 years after initial testing.

In Seeff's more recent study, published in the Feb. 2001 issue of Hepatology, he reported on nearly 600 people who had received blood transfusions in the 1970s. Approximately 67 percent of the 222 people infected with HCV had died 25 years later, compared with 56 percent of the 377 non-infected people who had died. Although these numbers reflect deaths from all causes, a liver-related cause for death was more common among the HCV-infected persons.

Treatments and Their Success

For some people with mild hepatitis C, the only treatment needed may be eating a nutritious diet, avoiding alcohol, exercising regularly, and visiting a doctor regularly to monitor the disease. But for others with hepatitis C, drug therapy may be appropriate.

The FDA has approved two different treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C: monotherapy (using a single drug, interferon) and combination therapy (using two drugs, interferon and ribavirin). Interferon, which is injected into the bloodstream, works by bolstering the immune response to HCV. Ribavirin, which is taken orally, may work by preventing the virus from reproducing (viral replication). Taken alone, ribavirin does not effectively suppress levels of the virus in the bloodstream. But studies have shown that the interferon and ribavirin combination, approved in 1998, is more effective than interferon alone.

The goal of treatment is sustained response--meaning that the virus is not measurable in the blood after drug therapy is completed. Those who continue to have measurable levels of the virus after treatment are considered non-responders. Relapsers "clear" the virus during therapy or shortly thereafter, but the virus returns after therapy ends.

About half of the people who initially respond to monotherapy (interferon alone) relapse. Only 10 percent to 20 percent of those treated with monotherapy have a sustained response, depending on the type of interferon used.

Early reports on a modified version of interferon monotherapy, PEG-Intron (pegylated interferon), made by Schering-Plough Corp. of Kenilworth, N.J., show a slightly higher sustained response rate--up to 25 percent. The FDA approved PEG-Intron in January as a monotherapy for treating chronic hepatitis C in adult patients not previously treated with interferon and whose livers are still working normally.

Combination therapy (conventional interferon plus ribavirin) shows better results: about 55 percent of patients initially respond, and 35 percent to 45 percent of those treated sustain the response. The FDA is currently reviewing data on the safety and effectiveness of a combination of PEG-Intron and ribavirin.

In addition to PEG-Intron, three other interferon products for HCV have been approved by the FDA: Intron A (made by Schering-Plough), Roferon-A (Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.), and Infergen (Amgen Inc.). These three products are injected three times a week; PEG-Intron is injected once a week.

There is no absolute way to know who will or won't respond to therapy. But health-care providers try to predict responsiveness using research tests to determine viral "load" and genotype, says John Ticehurst, MD, a medical officer in the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Testing for "viral load" determines the concentration of virus in the blood.

An HCV genotype, which is also determined by a blood test, reflects the variation in the genetic makeup of the virus. At least six different genotypes and many more subtypes of HCV exist. In the United States, genotypes 1, 2 and 3 are most common.

People with genotypes 2 and 3 are almost three times more likely to respond to therapy than those with genotype 1, according to NIDDK researchers. Unfortunately, about 70 percent of HCV-infected people in the United States have genotype 1.

Genotyping also is used to determine the duration of treatment for many people. For those with genotype 2 or 3, a 24-week course of combination therapy is appropriate, but for genotype 1, a 48-week treatment is usually prescribed.

Ken Gamache, of Middletown, Md., was diagnosed with hepatitis C in 1995, but believes that he became infected over 30 years ago after an operation. Gamache has genotype 1. He was treated initially with monotherapy, and when that failed, he tried combination therapy, again without success.

When first told he needed a liver transplant, Gamache thought it was a death sentence. Now, after nearly six years on a waiting list for a liver, he has more hope. "I caught it early in the cirrhosis process and am doing whatever I can to prevent further damage," he says. Gamache still gets tired and run down, but has learned to pace himself. "I exercise regularly, but don't overextend myself. I'm careful to get enough sleep, eat right, and take vitamins, and I don't drink or smoke."

Treatment Side Effects

"Side effects are variable," says Adrian Di Bisceglie, M.D., medical director of the American Liver Foundation and professor of internal medicine at St. Louis University. "About 10 percent of patients have virtually no side effects. Approximately 10 percent have very severe, almost disabling side effects and have to stop work or stop the drug. The remaining 80 percent have side effects--but they are tolerable."

Patricia Buchanan of Brooklyn Park, Minn., suffered severe side effects throughout the 19 months she was in treatment--first in a 24-week clinical trial with monotherapy, and then in a 52-week treatment course with combination therapy after the monotherapy didn't work.

Buchanan clearly remembers the completion of her therapy on Nov. 6, 1999. "When you do chemotherapy for over a year, you remember the date of your last injection," she says. "I lived on my couch because of the extreme fatigue. I lost two-thirds of my hair and I had nausea, fever, chills, body aches and terrible depression. I went from having diarrhea to being constipated."

For some people, the side effects decrease after the first few weeks of treatment. But many individuals experience severe side effects through the duration, which may persist for months after the therapy ends.

Because of interferon's potentially serious side effects, the products come with an FDA-approved medication guide written for patients. Under regulations that became effective in 1999, pharmacists must distribute a medication guide with products that the FDA has determined pose a serious risk and for which patient guidelines can help prevent that risk. The guide lists both the common, less serious side effects, and the rarer but potentially life-threatening ones.

The common side effects include "flu-like" symptoms, extreme fatigue, nausea and loss of appetite, thyroid problems, high blood sugar, hair loss, and skin reactions (such as redness and itching at the injection site). Possible serious side effects are psychoses or suicidal behavior, heart problems (low blood pressure, heart attack), other internal
organ damage, blood problems (blood counts falling dangerously low), and new or worsening autoimmune disease (such as rheumatoid arthritis and a form of lupus).

Side effects of ribavirin, the oral part of the combination therapy, include anemia, fatigue, irritability, skin rash, nasal stuffiness, sinusitis, and cough. Ribavirin can also cause birth defects, so pregnancy should be avoided during treatment and for six months afterward.

To Treat or Not to Treat

"If we had a treatment that was safe, good, and not unpleasant, we should treat everybody," says Seeff. Unfortunately, the length of treatment required, the low rate of success, and the current treatments' side effects--the severity of which is unpredictable from patient to patient--don't warrant treating everybody.

Treatment decisions should not be based on symptoms. "Patient symptoms are a very unrelated guide to the severity of hepatitis C," says Di Bisceglie. "Someone can be feeling very well and have severe hepatitis on a liver biopsy. Some patients have very profound symptoms, such as fatigue, but HCV is trivial in severity based on blood tests and a liver biopsy."

The NIH and CDC recommend treating people with HCV infection who are at greatest risk for progression to cirrhosis. These include individuals with four characteristics:

› a positive test for antibodies to HCV (meaning they were, or still are, infected with HCV),

› persistently elevated blood levels of a liver enzyme called alanine aminotransferase (ALT),

› a positive research test for HCV RNA (ribonucleic acid, which detects virus in the blood), and

› a liver biopsy that shows either advanced fibrosis or moderate degrees of inflammation and necrosis (death of living tissue).

For those with less severe liver damage, indications for treatment are less clear.

"Patients, along with their physicians, need to carefully evaluate the stage of their disease and other risk factors before deciding whether or not to undergo treatment with interferon-based therapies," says the FDA's Schwieterman.

After discussing the pros and cons of interferon treatment with her doctor, Helen Clark of Minnetonka, Minn., decided against it. Clark had acquired the virus in 1970 during treatment for a severe form of dysentery she contracted in Cozumel, Mexico. Following 18 life-saving blood transfusions, Clark continued to feel ill for years, but doctors could find nothing wrong. They dismissed her symptoms, telling her she was tired because she was a busy mother, or she was menopausal. Some said that it was "all in her head" and that she should see a psychiatrist. Finally, in 1997, a doctor diagnosed her with hepatitis C.

Clark has genotype 1 (the most resistant to treatment) and a high "viral load." Her liver biopsy did not show any fibrosis after 27 years of infection. So Clark decided she could live with the disease if she could do something about her fatigue and other debilitating symptoms. "Now I pace myself, take naps, and find ways to remove stress from my life."

Clark avoids red meat, which she claims gives her liver pains after eating. "And I haven't had a drop of alcohol since diagnosis," says Clark. Alcohol is toxic to the liver and can advance the progression to cirrhosis. Clark also attributes her decrease in symptoms to some alternative therapies, including acupuncture.

Along with experiencing symptoms of the virus, individuals with HCV infection often experience discrimination, says Clark. "People think you're an alcoholic or drug addict. And they're afraid of you--there's such a misconception about the infectiousness."

HCV is not spread through coughing, kissing, hugging, or casual contact. It is spread only by contact with blood and possibly other body fluids.

People with HCV infection should cover any open wounds, and be careful not to share personal care items such as toothbrushes, razors, and nail files.

It's possible to get the virus through unprotected sex with an infected partner. However, studies--which have focused mainly on long-term monogamous couples--have shown that transmission through sexual contact is rare.

There is a 5 percent risk that an HCV-positive mother can give the virus to her unborn child. There is no evidence that HCV is transmitted from mother to child through breastfeeding.

Diagnosis and Vaccination

Di Bisceglie encourages everyone at risk--not just those with symptoms--to be tested for HCV. (See "You May Be at Risk for Hepatitis C".)

The FDA has approved two types of test for detecting antibodies to HCV in a person's blood, providing evidence of infection. If a person is suspected of having HCV infection, the doctor should first obtain a blood sample for the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test (also called enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or ELISA). If this test result is negative, no further testing is needed.

But if the result is positive, an additional, more expensive test is used to rule out a "false positive." If this second test, the recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA, made by Chiron Corporation), yields a positive result, the person is considered to have been, or to currently be, infected. If the RIBA result is negative, the person is considered not to have been infected.

The FDA approved an over-the-counter home test system, called Hepatitis C Check, in 1999. Made by Home Access Health Corp. of Hoffman Estates, Ill., the product allows a person to take a sample of blood at home and mail it to a designated laboratory for analysis with EIA and, when appropriate, RIBA testing. The results are available anonymously by phone through a unique identification number.

A liver biopsy to examine tissue from the liver is not necessary for diagnosing HCV infection. "However, a biopsy is the only accurate way to check the severity and stage of liver disease," says the NIDDK's Seeff.

Hepatitis C patients--whether they decide to get treated or not--should be monitored regularly by their doctors. Patients not in treatment should have a blood test approximately every six months to check liver functioning. A baseline liver biopsy is recommended to establish the severity of HCV infection, and the biopsy should be repeated in three to five years. Patients on treatment will have additional and more frequent tests.

There is no vaccine for hepatitis C, but there are vaccines for hepatitis A and B. The CDC recommends these vaccines, particularly the hepatitis A vaccine, for HCV-positive individuals. Becoming infected with hepatitis A virus can be life threatening for someone with HCV infection. In May, the FDA approved a combined hepatitis A and B vaccine called Twinrix, marketed by SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals in Philadelphia.

An Individual Disease
"The progression of disease varies from person to person," says the NIDDK's Hoofnagle. "Therapies are getting better, and some people have time to wait."

Afraid they were running out of time, Gamache and Buchanan sought interferon treatment. For Gamache, it didn't work, but Buchanan remains "clear" (shows no detectable virus in the blood). Clark is waiting, hoping she won't need interferon treatment or that something better will come along. She is due for a liver biopsy this year. Ultimately, the decision to get treated or not for HCV infection is up to the individual and his or her health care provider.

"We insist people be educated about their treatment options and the risks involved," says Clark, who runs a support group with Buchanan to help people with hepatitis learn more about their disease. The support group also helps them deal with feelings of isolation, contamination, and fear. "It can be very scary," says Clark. "It puts you face to face with your own mortality and gives you a whole different perspective on life."

Gamache, who also joined a support group and volunteers at a hepatitis clinic, recommends leading a healthy lifestyle and keeping a positive attitude. "Anything you can do to help yourself, empower yourself, helps get rid of the sense of hopelessness," he says. "It doesn't have to be a death sentence."

Hepatitis C Study
Researchers are now recruiting individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) to be part of the largest and longest HCV study ever conducted. Called Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment Against Cirrhosis (HALT C), the eight-year study will be conducted at 10 research centers nationwide and will involve 1,350 participants.

The goal is to learn whether long-term pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in individuals who didn't respond to prior treatment will decrease liver damage over time. Pegylated interferon is a new, longer-acting form of interferon. The study is sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

For additional information, contact the NIH clinical center's patient recruitment and public liaison office toll-free at 1-800-411-1222 (TTY: 1-866-411-1010).

You May Be at Risk for Hepatitis C ; if you have:

1. had a blood transfusion before 1992 (when screening blood for HCV antibodies started);
2. shared needles for IV drug use (even if you injected drugs just once, many years ago);
3. shared straws for inhaling cocaine;
4. had body (including ear) piercing and tattoos with unsterile equipment;
5. had hemodialysis (used a kidney machine);
6. had frequent exposure to blood products (have hemophilia, chronic renal failure, cancer requiring chemotherapy, or an organ transplant);
7. had a needle-sticking accident (mainly a risk for health-care workers);
8. used an infected person's toothbrush, razor or other item that may have blood on it;
9. engaged in high-risk sexual behavior, such as having multiple partners or failing to use condoms.
For more information on hepatitis C virus (HCV) and on treatment for chronic hepatitis C:

www.hivandhepatitis.com  

www.hivandhepatitis.com  - Hepatitis C Section
 

FDA OKs Another Hepatitis C Therapy
Wed Oct 16, 9:28 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) - Hepatitis C patients won another option to treat the dangerous liver disease Wednesday: Hoffman-La Roche Inc. announced the government has approved its once-a-week injection called Pegasys.

 

Pegasys is a longer-acting version of the longtime hepatitis treatment interferon-alpha. But it's not the first. Competitor Schering-Plough Corp. won Food and Drug Administration (news - web sites) approval to sell its once-a-week hepatitis shot, Peg-Intron, almost two years ago.

Roche plans to debut Pegasys with a twist: The first 15,000 patients whose doctors prescribe Pegasys before the end of the year will get a three-month free trial of the shots. Roche says by the end of three months, doctors can tell which patients are likely to benefit from Pegasys and thus should continue taking it, and which should stop.

Roche didn't reveal what it will charge for Pegasys, but other leading hepatitis treatments cost from $500 to $1,500 a month.

 

 

 

T

here are approximately 400 million people infected with the Hepatitis C Virus  worldwide. An estimated 75% to 85% are chronic and have symptoms. Hepatitis C is one of the most important causes of liver disease; and, sadly enough has become the most common reason for liver transplants in the United States. You may be one of the 5 million people in the United States who suffers from HCV. 

An estimated 20% of those develop cirrhosis, liver cancer, or end-stage liver disease.  Our Website has a collection of the latest medical news and clinical information on this disease including reports from recent conferences, news articles, Web searches, and links to other related sources on the Web

This information has been compiled from a variety of sources; mainly the CDC website

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/c/fact.htm   


 

We are pleased to announce Donna Fanelli MSN NP has joined us in

answering your questions about HCV and treatment.

Click below to Ask Donna your HCV questions 

ASK DONNA J.C FANELLI MSN, NP

You will need to Join our forum with a quick registration

 Read previous questions

Donna J. C. Fanelli, MSN, NP-C, Medical Director of Primary Health and Wellness Center, LLC, in Milburn, NJ and Senior Clinical Research Coordinator of Gastroenterology Research Associates, LLC, in Cedar Knolls, NJ.  She is certified as an Acute Care Nurse Practitioner, an Adult Nurse Practitioner

We are very pleased to provide information in this forum. The information provided is for general educational purposes only and is intended to help users learn about health and diagnosed diseases. As always be sure to discuss matters with your doctor prior to making any important decisions regarding therapy choices. Your doctor knows you best.


 
HIV and Hepatitis.com Coverage of

DIGESTIVE DISEASE WEEK (DDW 2008)
May 17 - 22, 2008, San Diego, California

Conference Reports from NATAP

HIV and Hepatitis.com

Coverage of the
43rd EASL Conference (EASL 2008)
April 23 - 27, 2008, Milan Italy

 


Recommended Web Sites:

Status C Unknown

HCV Advocate

HIV and Hepatitis


 

Are you at risk? 1 in 50 Americans are infected with a virus called Hepatitis C

Click here to order a FREE Home Access Hepatitis C Test Kit.


 

Our Mission

We are committed to providing the best, up-to-date information regarding all aspects of Hepatitis C. Our goal is to help you and your loved ones become better equipped to handle this disease through knowledge and understanding.

Disclaimer

Any information found on this site is for educational purposes only. We do not give out any medical advice. Janis and Friends does not endorse any Physicians or Pharmaceutical companies mentioned throughout our Web Site. We strongly recommend you see your HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL  for the quality care you deserve. Please do not use any  information found on our Web Site for diagnosing any aspect of your disease.

Funding

This site does not use any advertisements whatsoever.  We are not funded by any outside contributions.

 Privacy Policy

 


 

We subscribe to the HON code principles

  Health On the Net Foundation Verify here 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Design downloaded from Zeroweb.org: Free website templates, layouts, and tools.